JAMA & ARCHIVES
Arch Fam Med
SEARCH
GO TO ADVANCED SEARCH
HOME  PAST ISSUES  TOPIC COLLECTIONS  CME  PHYSICIAN JOBS  CONTACT US  HELP
Institution: STANFORD Univ Med Center  | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In
  Vol. 2 No. 10, October 1993 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Contributions
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

An Overview of the Efficacy and Safety of Fenfluramine and Mazindol in the Treatment of Obesity

Keith A. Stahl, MD; Thomas F. Imperiale, MD

Arch Fam Med. 1993;2(10):1033-1038.


Abstract

Objective
To assess the validity of the perceptions that appetite-suppressant drugs are ineffective, potentially addictive, and fraught with side effects, we reviewed the effectiveness and safety of two such drugs with purported low abuse potential in the treatment of obesity: mazindol and fenfluramine hydrochloride.

Data Sources
Relevant studies in English published before September 1991 were identified using MEDLINE, accompanied by a cross-referenced manual search. Study Selection: All randomized clinical trials conducted with adults for at least 6 weeks' duration with weight change as an outcome.

Data Extraction
Data extracted from each report included key study characteristics, clinical information, cointerventions, and outcomes, including dropouts due to either adverse drug effects or perceived lack of effect.

Data Synthesis
Of 36 acceptable trials, 35 were double-blinded, 32 were placebo-controlled, and 13 were cross-over. Median duration of drug therapy was 12 weeks. In studies reporting such data, mean patient age was 41 years, and mean baseline weight was 84 kg (143% of ideal body weight). Among 1163 patients receiving drug therapy and patients receiving placebo, mean weight loss across all trials was 5.2 and 1.9 kg, respectively (P<.001). Among 32 direct comparisons between drug and placebo, the mean weight loss by sample size was 3.0 kg greater in the treatment group (P<.001), and did not vary in subgroup analyses of trial type, drug, or dose. Similar proportions of treatment and placebo groups dropped out (20% vs 22%; P=.34); however, overall dropout rates were higher in parallel trials (25% vs 9% for crossover trials). Dropouts due to adverse drug effects were more common in the treatment group (7% vs 2%; P<.001), while those due to perceived lack of effect were more common in the placebo group (6% vs 2%; P<.001). Mazindol resulted in fewer dropouts due to adverse drug effects (4% vs 9%; P<.001) and a perceived lack of effect (1% v 3%; P=.04). No drug addiction or adverse drug effects requiring medical intervention were reported.

Conclusion
The apparent short-term efficacy of these appetite-suppressant drugs and the lack of severe adverse drug effects or addiction suggest that they may be useful in the treatment of obesity. Further study of these agents with attention to long-term efficacy, safety, and health consequences is warranted.



Author Affiliations

From the Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University at MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio.



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Current and Potential Drugs for Treatment of Obesity
Bray and Greenway
Endocr. Rev. 1999;20:805-875.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Are Anorectic Agents the 'Magic Bullet' for Obesity?
Yanovski
Arch Fam Med 1993;2:1025-1027.
ABSTRACT  




HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1993 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.