JAMA & ARCHIVES
Arch Fam Med
SEARCH
GO TO ADVANCED SEARCH
HOME  PAST ISSUES  TOPIC COLLECTIONS  CME  PHYSICIAN JOBS  CONTACT US  HELP
Institution: STANFORD Univ Med Center  | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In
  Vol. 2 No. 9, September 1993 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Contribution
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Evaluation of the Benefits of Gastric Tube Feeding in an Elderly Population

James P. Weaver, MD; Patricia Odell, RN; Charlotte Nelson, MS

Arch Fam Med. 1993;2(9):953-956.


Abstract

Objective
To assess the benefits of gastric tube feeding in an elderly community hospital population.

Subjects
One hundred consecutive patients who required feeding gastrostomies from July 1984 through June 1987.

Setting
Durham (NC) Regional Hospital, a 380-bed community hospital.

Methods
Patients were evaluated using a quality of life scale (QL scale) adapted from Spitzer's QL Index. The evaluation was based on hospital records at the time of tube placement and interviews with patients or family members at followup between June 1991 and March 1992. Subjective evaluation of the benefits of gastric tube feeding were obtained in interviews with patients or their families at follow-up.

Results
Overall there was no significant change in the objective evaluation of quality of life at follow-up. Men, patients over 76 years of age, and patients with chronic illnesses such as multiple strokes or dementia showed the poorest response on the QL scale. Subjective evaluation by patients or their family members was positively correlated with objective evaluation on the QL scale. Family members of patients who showed the poorest response on the QL scale were more likely than other family members to respond no to the question, "Would you want this done to you if you were in his/her situation?"

Conclusions
Our QL scale provides a good indication of patients' and family members' subjective evaluation of the benefits of gastrostomy tube feeding after 4 to 8 years. Thus, the scale should be helpful to physicians who must consult with patients and their families and make decisions about the use of this procedure. The significant discrepancy between family members' evaluations of the benefit of the procedure to the patient and their refusal of the procedure for themselves if they were in the patient's situation confirms the need for advance directives and the importance of conscientious implementation of the Patient Self Determination Act of 1990.



Author Affiliations

From Central Carolina Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgical Associates, Durham, NC.



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Medical and Ethical Aspects of Long-term Enteral Tube Feeding
McMahon et al.
Mayo Clin Proc. 2005;80:1461-1476.
ABSTRACT  

Home Enteral Nutrition
Delegge
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2002;26:S4-S7.
 

Measurement of the Quality of Life
Orr
Arch Fam Med 1994;3:115-115.
ABSTRACT  

Measurement of the Quality of Life-Reply
Weaver
Arch Fam Med 1994;3:115-116.
ABSTRACT  

Gastric Tube Feeding in Elderly Patients
Sloane and Rizzolo
Arch Fam Med 1993;2:927-928.
ABSTRACT  




HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1993 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.