 |
|
Clinician Specialty and Treatment Style for Depressed Outpatients With and Without Medical Comorbidities
Lisa S. Meredith, PhD;
Kenneth B. Wells, MD, MPH;
Patti Camp, MS
Arch Fam Med. 1994;3(12):1065-1072.
Abstract
Background
The advent of clinical practice guidelines for the management of depression increases the importance of understanding variation across clinician specialty groups in treatment styles for depression and the role of medical comorbidities.
Methods
Data are reported by clinicians (N=470) and patients (N=2545). Multiple regression was used to compare the treatment styles (counseling and prescribing antidepressants) of family physicians with those of psychiatrists, medical subspecialists, internists, psychologists, and other therapists for depressed patients with different medical comorbidities.
Results
Relative to other primary care specialists, family physicians had the strongest preferences for both counseling and prescribing antidepressants for depressed patients. Family physicians reported preferences for treating with antidepressants that were similar to those of psychiatrists. However, in actual practice, medication use was higher among the patients of psychiatrists than those of family physicians. Mental health care specialists reported the strongest counseling preferences and provided the most counseling in actual practice, compared with general medicine physicians. Internists and subspecialists had similar preferences for prescribing antidepressants, but, compared with internists, subspecialists had lower preferences for counseling. Clinician preferences for counseling were similar for depressed patients with or without medical comorbidities, but preferences for prescribing antidepressants were lowest for patients with depression and myocardial infarction, compared with other patient groups.
Conclusions
Measures of clinician treatment style for depression are good proxies for counseling but not for prescribing practices. Among general medical physicians, family physicians have the strongest reported preferences in treating depression but, especially in terms of medication therapy, do not always follow those preferences. Preferred treatments of patients with and without medical comorbidities were similar. Findings have implications for improving the quality of treatment of depressed patients.
Author Affiliations
From RAND, Santa Monica, Calif (Drs Meredith and Wells and Ms Camp), and the Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of CaliforniaLos Angeles (UCLA) Neuropsychiatric Institute and Hospital, UCLA School of Medicine (Dr Wells).
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
|
Depression Management in Medical Clinics: Does Healthcare Sector Make a Difference?
Frayne et al.
American Journal of Medical Quality 2004;19:28-36.
ABSTRACT
The Quality of Care for Depressive and Anxiety Disorders in the United States
Young et al.
Arch Gen Psychiatry 2001;58:55-61.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Conceptions of depressive disorder and its treatment among 17 Swedish GPs. A qualitative interview study
Andersson et al.
Fam Pract 2001;18:64-70.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Primary Care Role in the Management of Childhood Depression: A Comparison of Pediatricians and Family Physicians
Rushton et al.
Pediatrics 2000;105:957-962.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Beliefs about the Helpfulness of Interventions for Mental Disorders: A Comparison of General Practitioners, Psychiatrists and Clinical Psychologists
Jorm et al.
Aust N Z J Psychiatry 1997;31:844-851.
ABSTRACT
The 'Usual Care' of Major Depression in Primary Care Practice
Schulberg et al.
Arch Fam Med 1997;6:334-339.
ABSTRACT
Treatment Typically Provided for Comorbid Anxiety Disorders
Meredith et al.
Arch Fam Med 1997;6:231-237.
ABSTRACT
Counseling Typically Provided for Depression: Role of Clinician Specialty and Payment System
Meredith et al.
Arch Gen Psychiatry 1996;53:905-912.
ABSTRACT
|
