JAMA & ARCHIVES
Arch Fam Med
SEARCH
GO TO ADVANCED SEARCH
HOME  PAST ISSUES  TOPIC COLLECTIONS  CME  PHYSICIAN JOBS  CONTACT US  HELP
Institution: CLOCKSS  | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In
  Vol. 3 No. 2, February 1994 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
 • Online Features
  Original Contributions
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (5)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

What Did the Doctor Do?

When Physicians and Patients Disagree

Michael Rohrbaugh, PhD; John C. Rogers, MD, MPH

Arch Fam Med. 1994;3(2):125-128.


Abstract



Objective
A serendipitous finding in a study of routine clinical encounters was that physicians and patients frequently gave discrepant reports of what had happened during a clinic visit. This report examines the conditions under which these discrepant perceptions occurred.

Design
Five experienced physicians and 189 patients completed postencounter questionnaires immediately following visits to an academic family practice clinic. After each encounter, the physician and patient estimated the duration of the visit and reported whether each of seven clinical events had occurred.

Results
The most common disagreements concerned whether the physician had provided counseling or performed a treatment procedure. Multiple regression analyses suggest that patient characteristics contributed to specific forms of physician-patient disagreement but that overall discrepancy was greatest in cases in which the physician minimized the importance of psychosocial issues and/or felt relatively confident about understanding the patient's problem.

Conclusions
Although correlation need not imply causality, the results raise the possibility that physicians can promote shared physician-patient understanding by paying more attention to psychosocial factors and being more circumspect in drawing conclusions about patients' problems.



Author Affiliations



From the School of Family and Consumer Resources, University of Arizona, Tucson (Dr Rohrbaugh), and the Department of Family Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Tex (Dr Rogers).



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Impact of the Ottawa Decision Support Framework on the Agreement and the Difference between Patients' and Physicians' Decisional Conflict
Legare et al.
Med Decis Making 2006;26:373-390.
ABSTRACT  




HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1994 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.

DCSIMG