JAMA & ARCHIVES
Arch Fam Med
SEARCH
GO TO ADVANCED SEARCH
HOME  PAST ISSUES  TOPIC COLLECTIONS  CME  PHYSICIAN JOBS  CONTACT US  HELP
Institution: CLOCKSS  | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In
  Vol. 3 No. 7, July 1994 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
 • Online Features
  Brief Reports
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Adolescent Measles Vaccination

Response Rates to Mailings Addressed to Patients vs Parents

Peter Harper, MD, MPH; Diane J. Madlon-Kay, MD

Arch Fam Med. 1994;3(7):619-622.


Abstract



Objective
To determine the measles vaccination rate in adolescents that could be achieved with a mailed notification of the recommendation, and to determine if the response rate differed if the mailing was addressed to the parents or to the adolescents.

Design
Randomized trial.

Setting
A family medicine residency training clinic serving a low-socioeconomic population.

Patients or Other Participants
Four hundred forty-nine adolescents aged 12 through 18 years who were seen in the clinic within the previous 21 months without receiving a documented second dose of measles vaccine were randomized into two groups.

Intervention
A letter recommending measles revaccination was sent to the parents in one group (parent group) and to the adolescents themselves in the second group (adolescent group). The content of both letters was basically the same, but they differed in style and reading level.

Main Outcome Measure
Measles vaccinations administered to adolescents during the 2-month period following mailing of the letters.

Results
Twenty-eight patients were excluded after randomization. Fifty-six letters were undeliverable after two mailing attempts. Eleven (6.3%) of 176 adolescents in the parent group and five (2.6%) of 189 adolescents in the adolescent group received the measles vaccination (P>.05).

Conclusions
Although the adolescents whose parents received the letter were twice as likely to be vaccinated, the response rate was poor in both groups. The letter campaign was not an effective method to reach adolescents for measles revaccination.



Author Affiliations



From the Department of Family Medicine, St Paul (Minn) Ramsey Medical Center.



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Effect of Telephone Reminder/Recall on Adolescent Immunization and Preventive Visits: Results From a Randomized Clinical Trial
Szilagyi et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2006;160:157-163.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Calculating a Clinic's Childhood Immunization Rate: Costs and Returns
Chapman and Hacker
Arch Fam Med 1995;4:625-627.
ABSTRACT  

Preventive Medicine for Adolescents: A Hopeless Cause or a Research Challenge for Family Physicians?
Rosser
Arch Fam Med 1994;3:579-580.
ABSTRACT  




HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1994 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.

DCSIMG