JAMA & ARCHIVES
Arch Fam Med
SEARCH
GO TO ADVANCED SEARCH
HOME  PAST ISSUES  TOPIC COLLECTIONS  CME  PHYSICIAN JOBS  CONTACT US  HELP
Institution: STANFORD Univ Med Center  | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In
  Vol. 6 No. 6, November 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  ORIGINAL CONTRIBUTION
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Do Physicians Do as They Say?

The Case of Mammography

Barry G. Saver, MD, MPH; Thomas R. Taylor, MD, PhD; Jonathan R. Treadwell, PhD; William G. Cole, PhD

Arch Fam Med. 1997;6(6):543-548.


Abstract

Objective
To assess the utility of survey-based physician policy in predicting actual mammography ordering behavior, as measured by medical record abstraction.

Design
Cross-sectional survey of practicing community physicians. Responses were correlated with data abstracted from the medical records of patients in the practices of the participating physicians.

Participants
Family and general practitioners in Washington State. Medical records of female patients aged 40 to 80 years provided data on actual mammography performance.

Main Outcome Measures
The proportions of female patients aged 40 to 49 and 50 to 80 years who had received a screening mammogram within the previous 2 years.

Results
Of the more than 100 potential predictors available, only 4 were significantly associated with screening rates for women younger than 50 years and only 3 were associated with screening rates for older women. Regression models explained only 21% to 25% of the variance in screening rates. Physician estimates of screening rates were poorly correlated with actual screening rates.

Conclusions
Practicing physicians do not know how well they screen their patients using mammography. Extensive survey data, including direct estimates of behavior, demographics, policy measures, and case scenario responses, were of limited use in predicting actual screening rates. Our results underscore the importance of using data rather than proxy measures to study physician performance.



Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Family Medicine (Drs Saver and Taylor), Psychology (Dr Treadwell), and Medical Education (Dr Cole), University of Washington, Seattle. Dr Cole is now with Information Design Seattle.



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Reality check: perceived versus actual performance of community mammographers.
Fenton et al.
Am. J. Roentgenol. 2006;187:42-46.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The difference between study recommendations, stated policy, and actual practice in a clinical trial
Goffin et al.
Ann Oncol 2004;15:1267-1273.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Factors Associated With Implementation of Preventive Care Measures in Patients With Diabetes Mellitus
Streja and Rabkin
Arch Intern Med 1999;159:294-302.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Do as I Do, Not as I Say
Paskett
Arch Fam Med 1997;6:549-550.
ABSTRACT  




HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1997 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.