JAMA & ARCHIVES
Arch Fam Med
SEARCH
GO TO ADVANCED SEARCH
HOME  PAST ISSUES  TOPIC COLLECTIONS  CME  PHYSICIAN JOBS  CONTACT US  HELP
Institution: CLOCKSS  | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In
  Vol. 8 No. 3, May 1999 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Special Article
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (12)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Medical Practice
 •Law and Medicine
 •Medical Ethics
 •End-of-life Care/ Palliative Medicine
 •Alert me on articles by topic

The Supreme Court Addresses Physician-Assisted Suicide

Can Its Rulings Improve Palliative Care?

Ann Alpers, JD; Bernard Lo, MD

Arch Fam Med. 1999;8:200-205.

In June 1997, the US Supreme Court unanimously decided that competent, terminally ill patients have no general constitutional right to commit suicide or to obtain assistance in committing suicide. Thus, the broad prohibitions against any kind of suicide assistance that almost every state has enacted do not violate the constitution. While many of the rulings and the bulk of the reaction to them focused on the Supreme Court's resolution of important legal controversies regarding physician-assisted suicide, this article focuses on the resulting potential for change in physicians' opinions on palliative care. The Court's reasoning may help physicians resolve substantial ethical dilemmas regarding the provision of narcotics given in high dosages, the care of incompetent patients, and the suffering caused by symptoms other than pain. For example, the Court concluded that a physician's intent can distinguish permissible acts of aggressive pain relief from impermissible acts of hastening death. This distinction has clinical uses and can help physicians develop ethical guidelines and practice standards to improve palliative care near the end of life.


From the Program in Medical Ethics, the Center for AIDS Prevention Studies, and the Division of General Internal Medicine, University of California, San Francisco.


RELATED ARTICLE

The Archives of Family Medicine Continuing Medical Education Program
Arch Fam Med. 1999;8(3):207-209.
FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Palliative Sedation in Dying Patients: "We Turn to It When Everything Else Hasn't Worked"
Lo and Rubenfeld
JAMA 2005;294:1810-1816.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

The quality of medical care at the end-of-life in the USA: existing barriers and examples of process and outcome measures
Yabroff et al.
Palliat Med 2004;18:202-216.
ABSTRACT  

Caring for the Dying in the Intensive Care Unit: In Search of Clarity
Rocker and Curtis
JAMA 2003;290:820-822.
FULL TEXT  

Existential suffering and palliative sedation: A brief commentary with a proposal for clinical guidelines
Rousseau
AM J HOSP PALLIAT CARE 2001;18:151-153.
 




HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1999 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.