JAMA & ARCHIVES
Arch Fam Med
SEARCH
GO TO ADVANCED SEARCH
HOME  PAST ISSUES  TOPIC COLLECTIONS  CME  PHYSICIAN JOBS  CONTACT US  HELP
Institution: STANFORD Univ Med Center  | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In
  Vol. 9 No. 9, September 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Original Contribution
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (4)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Endocrine Diseases
 •Diabetes Mellitus
 •Quality of Care, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Attitudes of Israeli Family Physicians Toward Clinical Guidelines

Shlomo Vinker, MD; Sasson Nakar, MD; Elliot Rosenberg, MD; Tal Bero-Aloni; Eliezer Kitai, MD

Arch Fam Med. 2000;9:835-840.

Background  Many clinical guidelines (CGs) have been written during the past few years. Although family physicians (FPs) stand to benefit from many of these CGs, incorporating new CGs into daily practice seems to present a challenge.

Objective  To evaluate Israeli FPs' attitudes toward CGs.

Methods  We administered an anonymous questionnaire to general practitioners, residents, and board-certified FPs who participated in continuing medical education programs throughout Israel during May and June 1998. Our survey focused on physician attitudes and behaviors regarding CGs in general, and to CGs for treating the patient with diabetes mellitus (DM) in particular. The CGs for patients with DM have recently been promoted in the context of primary care quality improvement programs. Respondents also provided demographic and professional data.

Results  Of the 404 questionnaires distributed, 293 questionnaires were returned for a response rate of 83%. The average (±SD) age of respondents was 40.2 ± 7.0 years, with a mean (±SD) of 13.3 ± 8.0 years in practice. Overall, opinion regarding CGs was positive. About half of the respondents thought CGs improved patient compliance. Comparisons between the various physician groups highlighted several notable differences. Two thirds of the general practitioners believed CGs improved patient compliance, while this was true of only one third of the FPs (P<.001). Most FPs (62%) and senior residents (69%) felt CGs did not constrain their clinical freedom, while less than half of the general practitioners and junior residents felt this way (P = .045). Eighty-three percent of all respondents agreed that the CGs for the treatment of DM were able to be implemented, and 75% believed the CGs assisted them in the management of patients with DM. Whereas 39% expressed concern about being able to adapt generic CGs to individual patient needs, only 27% (P = .002) felt this way about the DM CGs. The vast majority (92%) were interested in understanding the scientific evidence supporting CGs as a prerequisite to adopting them. Most respondents preferred limiting CG length to a maximum of 5 pages.

Conclusions  We found support among Israeli FPs for the use of CGs. Clinical guidelines seem to be used in the field, in particular those developed for treating DM. In light of our findings, attention should be focused on optimally tailoring new CGs to meet scientific standards and crafting them to suit the preferences of local FPs.


From the Department of Family Medicine, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel (Drs Vinker, Nakar, Bero-Aloni, and Kitai); and the Department of Health Promotion and Disease Prevention, Ben-Gurion University, Negev, Israel (Dr Rosenberg).


RELATED ARTICLE

The Archives of Family Medicine Continuing Medical Education Program
Arch Fam Med. 2000;9(9):887-891.
FULL TEXT  


THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Getting clinical trial results into practice: design, implementation, and process evaluation of the ALLHAT Dissemination Project
Bartholomew et al.
Clin Trials 2009;6:329-343.
ABSTRACT  

Antibiotic Use for Upper Respiratory Tract Infections: How Well Do Pediatric Residents Do?
Nambiar et al.
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2002;156:621-624.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  




HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2000 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.