 |
|
Ethical and Practical Implications of the Human Genome Initiative for Family Medicine
S. Van McCrary, PhD, JD, MPH;
Bill Allen, JD;
Ray Moseley, PhD;
Lee A. Crandall, PhD;
Harry Ostrer, MD;
R. Whit Curry, MD;
Marvin A. Dewar, MD, JD;
David Nye, PhD
Arch Fam Med. 1993;2(11):1158-1163.
References
Article references have been provided for searching and linking. Additional reference information may be available in the article PDF.
| |
1. Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs, American Medical Association. Use of genetic testing by employers. JAMA. 1991;266:1827-1830.
FREE FULL TEXT
2. Juengst ET. The Human Genome Project and bioethics. Kennedy Inst Ethics J. 1991;1:71-74.
PUBMED
3. Rogers JC, Rohrbaugh M. The SAGE-PAGE trial: do family genograms make a difference? J Am Board Fam Pract. 1991;4:319-326.
PUBMED
4. Whittaker LA. The implications of the Human Genome Project for family practice. J Fam Pract. 1992;35:294-301.
PUBMED
5. Gilbert W. DNA sequencing, today and Tomorrow. Hosp Pract. 1991;26:129-138.
6. Moseley R, McCrary SV, Allen WL, et al. The Ethical, Legal, and Social Implications of the Human Genome Initiative for Health Insurance: Policy Analysis and Recommendations. Gainesville, Fla: The Human Genome Insurance Project; 1993. 7. Ostrer H, Allen WL, Crandall LA, et al. Insurance and genetic testing: where are we now? Am J Hum Genet. 1993;52:565-577.
PUBMED
8. Jonsen AR, Siegler M, Winslade WJ. Clinical Ethics. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Macmillan Publishing Co Inc; 1986:61-65. 9. Kratka J. For Their Eyes Only: The Insurance Industry and Consumer Privacy. Boston: Massachusetts Public Interest Research Group; 1990. 10. McGann V H & H Music, 946 F2d 401 (5th Cir 1991), cert denied, 61 USLW 3352 (1992).
|
