 |
|
Primary Care and the Human Genome ProjectInto the Breach
David J. Doukas, MD
Arch Fam Med. 1993;2(11):1179-1183.
References
Article references have been provided for searching and linking. Additional reference information may be available in the article PDF.
| |
1. Nolan K, Swenson S. New tools, new dilemmas: genetic frontiers. Hastings Cent Rep. 1988;18(5):40-46.
PUBMED
2. Murray TH. The Human Genome Project and genetic testing: ethical implications. In: The Genome, Ethics and the Law: Issues in Genetic Testing. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science; 1991:49-78. 3. Powledge T. Ethical and legal implications of genetic testing: a synthesis. In: The Genome, Ethics and the Law: Issues in Genetic Testing. Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science; 1991:1-21. 4. Botkin JR. Prenatal screening: professional standard and the limits of parental choice. Obstet Gynecol. 1990;75:875-880.
PUBMED
5. Davis JG. Genetic disease, government, and social justice. In: Milunsky A, Annas G, eds. Genetics and the Law III. New York, NY: Plenum Press; 1985:385-393. 6. Elsas L. A clinical approach to legal and ethical problems in human genetics. Emory Law J. 1990;39(3):814-824.
7. Lippman-Hand A, Fraser FC. Genetic counseling: parents' responses to uncertainty. Birth Defects. 1979;15:325-339.
PUBMED
8. Walters L. Genetics and reproductive technologies. In: Veatch R, ed. Medical Ethics. Boston, Mass: Jones & Bartlett; 1989:201-228. 9. Collins F. Medical and ethical consequences of the Human Genome Project. J Clin Ethics. 1991;2:260-267.
PUBMED
10. Brody H. Ethics, technology, and the Human Genome Project. J Clin Ethics. 1991;2:278-281.
PUBMED
11. Doukas D. Genetics research and social roles: on a collision course? J Clin Ethics. 1991;2:258-259.
PUBMED
12. Quaid KA, Brandt J, Faden RR, Folstein SE. Knowledge, attitude, and the decision to be tested for Huntington's disease. Clin Genet. 1989;36:431-438.
PUBMED
13. Wiggins S, Whyte MA, Huggins M, et al. The psychological consequences of predictive testing for Huntington's disease. N Engl J Med. 1992;327:1401-1405.
ABSTRACT
14. Doukas D. Autonomy and beneficence in the family: describing the family covenant. J Clin Ethics. 1991;2:145-148.
PUBMED
15. Hays CV. Genetic disease for Huntington's disease: a family issue. N Engl J Med. 1992;327:1449-1451.
PUBMED
16. Singer E. Public attitudes toward genetic testing. Popul Res Policy Rev. 1991;10:235-255.
PUBMED
17. Bazelon DL. Governing technology: values, choices, and scientific progress. In: Iannone AP, ed. Contemporary Moral Controversies in Technology. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1987: 132-140. 18. Byk C. The Human Genome Project and the social contract: a law policy approach. J Med Philos. 1992:17:371-380.
FREE FULL TEXT
19. Holtzman NA. Public participation in genetic policymaking. In: Milunsky A. Annas G. eds. Genetics and the Law II. New York, NY: Plenum Press; 1980:247-255. 20. President's Commission for the Study of Ethical Problems in Medicine and Biomedical and Behavioral Research. Splicing Life: The Social and Ethical Issues of Genetics Engineering With Human Beings. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 1982. 21. Fishkin J. The Dialogue of Justice: Toward a Self-Reflective Society. New Haven, Conn: Yale University Press; 1992. 22. Fleck LM. Just health care rationing: a democratic decisionmaking approach. Univ Pennsylvania Law Rev. 1992:140:1636.
23. Jennings B. A grassroots movement in bioethics: community health decisions. Hastings Cent Rep. 1988;18(special suppl):1-16.
PUBMED
|
