 |
|
Does the System of Papanicolaou Test Nomenclature Affect the Rate of Referral for Colposcopy?A Survey of Family Physicians
Joy Melnikow, MD, MPH;
Anne Sierk, MD;
Susan Flocke, MA;
Claudia A. Peters, MD
Arch Fam Med. 1993;2(3):253-258.
References
Article references have been provided for searching and linking. Additional reference information may be available in the article PDF.
| |
1. Woolf SH. Screening for cervical cancer. In: Goldbloon RB, Lawrence RS, eds. Preventing Disease: Beyond the Rhetoric. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag NY Inc; 1990:319-323.
2. Healthy People 2000. Washington DC: US Dept of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service; 1990. DHHS publication PHS 91-50212:430. 3. National Cancer Institute Workshop. The 1988 Bethesda system for reporting cervical/vaginal cytological diagnoses. JAMA. 1989;262:931-934.
FREE FULL TEXT
4. Malkasian GD. Cytopathological interpretation and medical consultation. JAMA. 1989;262:942.
FREE FULL TEXT
5. Ohrt DK. The intraepithelial lesion: a spectrum of problems. JAMA. 1989;262:944-945.
FREE FULL TEXT
6. Herbst AL. The Bethesda system for cervical/ vaginal cytologic diagnoses: a note of caution. Obstet Gynecol. 1990;76:449-450.
PUBMED
7. Kurman RJ, Malkasian Jr GD, Sedlis A, Solomon D. From Papanicolaou to Bethesda: the rationale for a new cervical cytologic classification. Obstet Gynecol. 1991;77:779-782.
PUBMED
8. Vooijis GP, Solomon D, Kraemer BB. Does the Bethesda system promote or endanger the quality of cervical cytology? Acta Cytol. 1990;34:455-459.
PUBMED
9. Anderson G. Bethesda system of reporting: a Canadian viewpoint. Diagn Cytopathol. 1991;7:559-561.
PUBMED
10. Koss LG. The new Bethesda system for reporting results of smear of the uterine cervix. Acta Cytol. 1990;34:616-619.
11. Bottles K, Reiter RC, Steiner AL, Zaleski S, Bedrosian CWM, Johnson SR. Problems encountered with the Bethesda system: the University of Iowa experience. Obstet Gynecol. 1991;78:410-414.
PUBMED
12. Broder S. Rapid communication—the Bethesda system for reporting cervical/ vaginal cytologic diagnoses: report of the 1991 Bethesda workshop. JAMA. 1992;267:1892.
FREE FULL TEXT
13. Maheaux B, Legault C, Lambert J. Increasing response rates in physicians' mail surveys: an experimental study. Am J Public Health. 1989;79:638-639.
FREE FULL TEXT
14. Himmelstein LR. Evaluation of inflammatory atypia: a literature review. J Reprod Med. 1989;34:634-637.
PUBMED
15. Richart RM. Causes and management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Cancer. 1987;60:1951-1959.
PUBMED
16. Brown MS, Phillips GL. Management of the mildly abnormal Pap smear: a conservative approach. Gynecol Oncol. 1985;22:149-153.
PUBMED
17. Nasiell K, Roger V, Nasiell M. Behavior of mild cervical dysplasia during long-term follow-up. Obstet Gynecol. 1986;65:665-669.
18. Singer A, Jenkins D. Viruses and cervical cancer. BMJ. 1991:302:251-252.
FREE FULL TEXT
19. Robertson JH, Woodend BE, Crozier EH, Hutchinson J. Risk of cervical cancer associated with mild dyskaryosis. BMJ. 1988;297:18-21.
FREE FULL TEXT
20. Rosner B. Fundamentals of Biostatistics. Boston, Mass: Duxbury Press; 1986: 335-336. 21. SPSS/PC+ V2.0 Base Manual. Chicago, Ill: SPSS Inc; 1988. 22. American Medical Association. Physician Characteristics and Distribution in the United States. Chicago, Ill: American Medical Association; 1990:90. 23. US Preventive Services Task Force. Guide to Clinical Preventive Services: An Assessment of the Effectiveness of 169 Interventions. Baltimore, Md: Williams & Wilkins; 1989:25. 24. American College of Physicians. Screening for cervical cancer. In: Eddy M, ed. Common Screening Tests. Philadelphia, Pa: American College of Physicians; 1991. 25. Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination. The periodic health examination. Can Med Assoc J. 1979;121:1193-1254.
PUBMED
26. American Cancer Society. Summary of Current Guidelines for the Cancer-Related Checkup: Recommendations. Atlanta, Ga: American Cancer Society; 1988. 27. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Committee on Professional Standards. Report of task force on routine cancer screening. In: Standards for Obstetric-Gynecologic Services. 7th ed. Washington, DC: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; 1989:97-104. 28. Jones TV, Gerrity MS, Earp J. Written case simulations: do they predict physicians' behavior? J Clin Epidemiol. 1990;43:805-815.
PUBMED
29. Moskowitz AJ, Kuipers B, Kassier JP. Dealing with uncertainty, risks, and tradeoffs in clinical decisions: a cognitive science approach. Ann Intern Med. 1988;108:435-449.
FREE FULL TEXT
30. Hartley RM, Charlton JR, Jarman B, Harris CM. Case history questionnaires in the study of doctors' use of resources. Med Care. 1985;23:1163-1170.
PUBMED
31. Tversky A, Kahneman D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science. 1981;211:453-458.
FREE FULL TEXT
32. Bryant GD, Norman GR. Expressions of probability: words and numbers. N Engl J Med. 1980;302:411.
PUBMED
33. Maquire NC. Current use of the Papanicolaou class system in gynecologic cytology. Diagn Cytopathol. 1988;4:169-176.
PUBMED
34. Brook RH. Practice guidelines and practicing medicine. JAMA. 1989;262:3027-3030.
FREE FULL TEXT
35. Chassin MR. Practice guidelines: best hope for quality improvement in the 1990s. J Occup Med. 1990;32:1199-1206.
PUBMED
36. Woolf SH. Practice guidelines: a new reality in medicine. Arch Intern Med. 1990;150:1811-1818.
FREE FULL TEXT
37. Clinical guideline development. In: AHCPR program note. Washington, DC: Agency for Health Care Policy and Research, US Dept of Health and Human Services; 1990:1-5. 38. Health Services Research Group. Standards, guidelines and clinical policies. Can Med Assoc J. 1992;146:833-837.
PUBMED
39. Miller AB, Anderson G, Brisson J, et al. Report of a national workshop on screening for cancer of the cervix. Can Med Assoc J. 1991;145:1301-1325.
PUBMED
40. Lomas K, Anderson GM, Domnick-Pierre K, Vayda E, Enkin MW, Hannah WJ. Do practice guidelines guide practice? N Engl J Med. 1989;321:1306-1311.
ABSTRACT
41. Kosecoff J, Kanouse DE, Rogers WH, McCloskey L, Winslow CM, Brook RH. Effect of the National Institutes of Health consensus development of physician practice. JAMA. 1987;258:2708-2713.
FREE FULL TEXT
42. Hill MN, Levine DM, Whelton PK. Awareness, use and impact of the 1984 Joint National Committee consensus report on high blood pressure. Am J Public Health. 1988;78:1190-1194.
FREE FULL TEXT
43. Lomas J. Words without action? the production dissemination and impact of consensus recommendations. Ann Rev Public Health. 1991;12:41-65.
PUBMED
|
