|
|
Trial of Labor or Repeated Cesarean SectionThe Woman's Choice
Richard G. Roberts, MD, JD;
Hanan S. Bell, PhD;
Eric M. Wall, MD, MPH;
Julie Graves Moy, MD, MPH;
George H. Hess, MD;
Hugh P. H. Bower, MD
Arch Fam Med. 1997;6(2):120-125.
References Article references have been provided for searching and linking. Additional reference information may be available in the article PDF.
| |
1. Craigin EB. Conservatism in obstetrics. N Y Med J. 1916;104:1-3.
2. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Obstetrics: Maternal and Fetal Medicine. ACOG Committee Opinion Number 17: Guidelines for Vaginal Delivery After a Previous Cesarean Birth. Washington, DC: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; November 1984. 3. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Obstetric Practice. ACOG Committee Opinion Number 143: Vaginal Delivery After a Previous Cesarean Birth. Washington, DC: American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; October 1994. 4. Flamm BL, Lim OW, Jones C, et al. Vaginal birth after cesarean section: results of a multicenter study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1988;158:1079-1084.
PUBMED
5. Flamm BL, Newman LA, Thomas SJ, et al. Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: results of a 5-year multicenter collaborative study. Obstet Gynecol. 1990;76:750-754.
PUBMED
6. Flamm BL, Goings JR, Liu Y, et al. Elective repeat cesarean delivery versus trial of labor: a prospective multicenter study. Obstet Gynecol. 1994;83:927-932.
PUBMED
7. Bouchar M, Tahilramaney MP, Eglinton GS, Phelan JP. Maternal morbidity as related to trial of labor after previous cesarean delivery: a quantitative analysis. J Reprod Med. 1984;29:12-16.
PUBMED
8. Meehan FP, Magani IM. True rupture of the cesarean section scar (a 15-year review, 1972-87). Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1989;30:129-135.
PUBMED
9. Von Amerongen D. Vaginal birth after cesarean section: experience in a communitybased practice. J Reprod Med. 1989;34:531-534.
PUBMED
10. Rosen MG, Dickinson JC. Vaginal birth after cesarean: a meta-analysis of indicators for success. Obstet Gynecol. 1990;76:865-869.
PUBMED
11. Rosen MG, Dickinson JC, Westhoff CL. Vaginal birth after cesarean: a metaanalysis of morbidity and mortality. Obstet Gynecol. 1991;77:465-470.
PUBMED
12. Shy KK, LoGerfo JP, Karp LE. Evaluation of elective repeat cesarean section as a standard of care: an application of decision analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1981;139:123-129.
PUBMED
13. Afriat CI. Vaginal birth after cesarean section: a review of the literature. J Perinat Neonat Nurs. 1990;3:1-13.
PUBMED
14. Eddy DM. A Manual for Assessing Health Practices and Designing Practice Policies: The Explicit Approach. Philadelphia, Pa: American College of Physicians; 1992. 15. American Academy of Family Physicians. Trial of Labor Versus Elective Repeat Cesarean Section for the Woman With a Previous Cesarean Section: A Clinical Policy. Kansas City, Mo: American Academy of Family Physicians; April 1995. 16. Eddy DM, Hasselblad V. FAST*PRO: Software for Meta-analysis by the Confidence Profile Method. Orlando, Fla: Academic Press Inc; 1992. 17. McClain CS. The making of a medical tradition: vaginal birth after cesarean. Soc Sci Med. 1990;31:203-210.
PUBMED
18. Kirk EP, Doyle KA, Leigh J, Garrard MD. Vaginal birth after cesarean or repeat cesarean section: medical risks or social realities? Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990;162:1398-1403.
PUBMED
19. Murphy MC, Harvey SM. Choice of a childbirth method after cesarean. Women Health. 1989;15:67-85.
PUBMED
20. Eraker SA, Politser P. How decisions are reached: physicians and patients. Ann Intern Med. 1982;97:262-268.
FREE FULL TEXT
21. Haq CL. Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. Am Fam Phys. 1988;37:167-171.
PUBMED
22. Goyert GL, Bottoms SF, Treadwell MC, Nehra PC. The physician factor in cesarean birth rates. N Engl J Med. 1989;320:706-709.
ABSTRACT
23. Clemenson N. Promoting vaginal birth after cesarean section. Am Fam Phys. 1993;47:139-144.
PUBMED
24. Porreco RP, Meier PR. Trial of labor in patients with multiple previous cesarean sections. J Reprod Med. 1983;28:770-772.
PUBMED
25. Center for Health Statistics, US Department of Health and Human Resources. Monthly Vital Stat Rep. 1994;43:20.
26. King DE, Lahiri K. Socioeconomic factors and the odds of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery. JAMA. 1994;272:524-529.
FREE FULL TEXT
27. Gould JB, Davey B, Stafford RS. Socioeconomic differences in rates of cesarean section. N Engl J Med. 1989;321:233-239.
ABSTRACT
28. Zdeb MS, Logrillo VM. Cesarean childbirth in New York State: trends and directions. Birth. 1989;16:203-220.
PUBMED
29. Kline J, Arias F. Analysis of factors determining the selection of repeated cesarean section or trial of labor in patients with histories of prior cesarean delivery. J Reprod Med. 1993;38:289-292.
PUBMED
30. McClain CS. Why women choose trial of labor or repeat cesarean section. J Fam Pract. 1985;2:210-216.
31. Christensen-Szalanski JJJ. Discount functions and the measurement of patients' values: women's decisions during childbirth. Med Decis Making. 1984;4:47-58.
FREE FULL TEXT
32. Joseph GF, Stedman CM, Robichaux AG. Vaginal birth after cesarean section: the impact of patient resistance to a trial of labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1991;164:1441-1447.
PUBMED
33. Abitbol MM, Castillo I, Taylor UB, et al. Vaginal birth after cesarean section: the patient's point of view. Am Fam Phys. 1993;47:129-134.
PUBMED
34. Cranley MS, Hedahl KJ, Pegg SH. Women's perceptions of vaginal and cesarean deliveries. Nurs Res. 1983;32:10-15.
PUBMED
35. Erb L, Hill G, Houston D. A survey of parents' attitudes toward their cesarean births in Manitoba hospitals. Birth. 1983;10:85-91.
PUBMED
36. Reichert JA, Baron M, Fawcett J. Changes in attitudes toward cesarean birth. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 1993;22:159-167.
PUBMED
37. Finkler SA. The distinction between cost and charges. Ann Intern Med. 1982;96:102-109.
FREE FULL TEXT
38. Minor AF. HIAA Research Bulletin: The Cost of Maternity Care and Childbirth in the United States, 1989. Washington, DC: Health Insurers Association of America; December 1989. Publication R1589. 39. Metropolitan Insurance Company. Charges for a cesarean section: United States, 1990. Stat Bull Metrop Insur Co. 1992;1973:12-18.
40. Hillman AL. Health maintenance organizations, financial incentives and physicians' judgements. Ann Intern Med. 1990;112:891-893.
PUBMED
41. Hadley J, Hoffman J, Feder J. Relationships Between Health Insurance Coverage and Selected Health and Hospital Use Characteristics of Newborns and Pregnant Women. Washington, DC: Washington Center for Health Policy Studies, Georgetown University; 1989. 42. Gold RB, Kenney AM, Singh S. Paying for maternity care in the United States. Fam Plan Perspect. 1987;19:190-206.
PUBMED
43. Enthoven A, Kronick R. A consumer choice health plan for the 1990s. N Engl J Med. 1989;320:29-37, 94-101.
ABSTRACT
44. Spellacy WN. Vaginal birth after cesarean: a reward/penalty system for national implementation. Obstet Gynecol. 1991;78:316-317.
PUBMED
45. Keeler EB, Brodie M. Economic incentives in the choice between vaginal delivery and cesarean section. Milbank Q. 1993;71:365-404.
PUBMED
46. Finkler MD, Wirtschafter DD. Why pay extra for cesarean-section deliveries? Inquiry. 1993;30:208-215.
PUBMED
47. Danforth DN. Cesarean section. JAMA. 1985;253:811-818.
FREE FULL TEXT
48. Porreco RP, Klaus MH, Shearer E, Petitti D, Hohe P, Boylan PC. The cesarean section rate is 25 percent and rising: why? what can be done about it? Birth. 1989;16:118-122.
PUBMED
49. Barclay L, Andre CA, Glover PA. Women's business: the challenge of childbirth. Midwifery. 1989;5:122-133.
PUBMED
50. Sims PD, Cabral D, Daley W, Alfano L. The incentive plan: an approach for modification of physician behavior. Am J Public Health. 1984;74:150-152.
FREE FULL TEXT
51. Darby M. Reimbursement has small impact on C-section rates. In: Report on Medical Guidelines and Outcomes Research. Alexandria, Va: Capitol Publications; 1992:8-10. 52. Stafford RS. Alternative strategies for controlling rising cesarean section rates. JAMA. 1990;263:683-687.
FREE FULL TEXT
53. Goodman RA, ed. Rates of cesarean delivery: United States, 1993. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 1995;44:303-307.
PUBMED
|