Economic Motivation for Post-Tenure Review in Academic Institutions

David A. Dilts
Hedayeh Samavati
Mashaalah Rahnama-Moghadam


DOI: 10.2190/CN.31.4.d

Abstract

This article examines the post-tenure review process and the economic motivations for post-tenure review. Economic theory suggests that there is a negative relation between compensation levels and tenure contracts. The available evidence shows that there is a negative salary differential between jobs with tenure and jobs without tenure consistent with the predictions of economic theory. This also suggests that, in litigation, the courts will not place a high value on academic tenure. Post-tenure review seems to have two motivations: One is purely economic, and the other is formative, that is, faculty development. The evidence suggests the latter has been effective in improving faculty performance.

Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License.