Constipation in the Daily Lives of Frail Elderly People
Connie R. Wolfsen, RN, MS;
Judith C. Barker, PhD;
Linda S. Mitteness, PhD
Arch Fam Med. 1993;2(8):853-858.
Abstract
| |
Objective
To examine the meaning and context of constipation in frail elders.
Design
Interview study with monthly follow-up for a 6-month period.
Setting
Respondents' homes.
Participants
Two hundred eleven randomly selected community-living, frail elders receiving in-home health care.
Results
Constipation was spontaneously mentioned by 94 patients (45%); it was considered a major health problem by 11% of these frail elders. Of this 11%, over half rated it as one of their top three health concerns. Of elders who talked about management strategies, most (43 [61%] of 70 patients) used medication alone. Only eight people did not use pharmacologic agents. Few (16 [17%] of 94 patients) mentioned a health-care professional in the context of constipation, and only five of these people expressed satisfaction with advice or treatment.
Conclusions
Constipation was a health problem for many of these elderly patients receiving home health care. Although the stated goal in the treatment of constipation is to avoid laxatives, both lay and medical management focused primarily on the use of medications. The results of this study underscore the importance of addressing quality of life as well as physiological issues for optimal treatment of constipation and similar disorders.
Author Affiliations
From the Division of Medical Anthropology, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco.
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
Effectiveness of laxatives in adults
Petticrew et al.
Qual Saf Health Care 2001;10:268-273.
FULL TEXT
Use of a Self-Report Constipation Questionnaire With Older Adults in Long-Term Care
Frank et al.
Gerontologist 2001;41:778-786.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Bowel Habit in Relation to Age and Gender: Findings From the National Health Interview Survey and Clinical Implications
Harari et al.
Arch Intern Med 1996;156:315-320.
ABSTRACT
|
