JAMA & ARCHIVES
Arch Fam Med
SEARCH
GO TO ADVANCED SEARCH
HOME  PAST ISSUES  TOPIC COLLECTIONS  CME  PHYSICIAN JOBS  CONTACT US  HELP
Institution: CLOCKSS  | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In
  Vol. 3 No. 3, March 1994 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
 • Online Features
  Original Contributions
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (18)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Does Curriculum Make a Difference?

A Comparison of Family Physicians With and Without Rheumatology Training During Residency

Gary Schwartz, MD; Joel H. Merenstein, MD; Frank D'Amico, PhD; Amrit Agarwal, MD

Arch Fam Med. 1994;3(3):263-267.


Abstract



Objective
To assess the long-term effect of an extensive rheumatology curriculum on graduates of family practice residencies.

Design
Cohort analytic study using a mailed survey and a multiple-choice test based on clinical vignettes that were administered 3 to 7 years after graduation from residency training.

Participants
Practicing family physicians who had graduated from a community hospital family practice residency with an extensive rheumatology curriculum (trained) were compared with graduates from a similar program without specific rheumatology training (untrained).

Main Outcome Measures
Total test scores, results of individual test questions, practice style, and attitudes toward rheumatology training and practice.

Results
We received 39 (85%) responses from 46 potential respondents in the trained group and 25 (89%) responses from 28 potential respondents in the untrained group. Physicians in the two groups had similar backgrounds and practice styles. The trained physicians scored higher on the multiple-choice test (mean±SD, 25±5 vs 22±6; P<.03). The clinical significance of these differences is a matter of individual interpretation. One hundred percent of the trained physicians believed that the quality of their rheumatology training was good to excellent compared with 25% of the untrained physicians. Seventy-six percent of the untrained physicians wished that they knew more about rheumatology. No variables other than rheumatology training accounted for the differences between the two groups.

Conclusion
The difference in rheumatology knowledge, evident during and soon after residency between trained and untrained physicians, persists for 3 to 7 years.



Author Affiliations



From the Family Practice Residency and Fellowship Program, Saint Margaret Memorial Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pa. Dr Schwartz is now with the Shepardstown Family Practice, Mechanicsburg, Pa.



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Diagnostic Accuracy for Lupus and Other Systemic Autoimmune Diseases in the Community Setting
Narain et al.
Arch Intern Med 2004;164:2435-2441.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  

Student-selected components in rheumatology--what, why, where and how?
Rahman et al.
Rheumatology (Oxford) 2004;43:263-266.
FULL TEXT  

The Challenge for Educators: Does What We Do Make a Difference?
Skochelak
Arch Fam Med 1994;3:221-222.
ABSTRACT  




HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1994 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.

DCSIMG