Failure of the Community-Based Vita-Stat Automated Blood Pressure Device to Accurately Measure Blood Pressure
Barbara L. Whitcomb, MD;
Allan Prochazka, MD;
Mary LoVerde, ANP;
Richard L. Byyny, MD
Arch Fam Med. 1995;4(5):419-424.
Abstract
| |
Objective
To evaluate the Vita-Stat automated blood pressure computer (a patient-operated blood pressure measuring device available in the community) to determine its value as an instrument to monitor blood pressure in the ambulatory patient.
Design
Comparative study using the Vita-Stat vs a gold standard, the mercury sphygmomanometer.
Setting
Three local grocery stores.
Participants
Sixty-three passersby who agreed to answer questions and to sit for several measurements of blood pressure.
Interventions
Simultaneous measurement of blood pressure with each subject wearing a Vita-Stat cuff on the left arm and a mercury sphygmomanometer cuff on the right arm. Two pressures were measured sequentially in the same manner.
Main Outcome Measures
The reproducibility, accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the Vita-Stat computer compared with the gold standard.
Results
In sequential measurements, the Vita-Stat readings of both systolic and diastolic blood pressure correlated less well with each other than did the mercury readings (intramachine differences). The Vita-Stat readings also correlated poorly with the mercury readings of systolic and diastolic blood pressure (intermachine differences). The variability in readings recorded by the Vita-Stat were striking, with differences of up to 60 mm Hg from the mercury readings. More than half (63.2%) of the subjects had Vita-Stat readings that were more than 5 mm Hg different from the mercury readings. Vita-Stat systolic readings were usually lower than mercury readings and also varied by as much as 60 mm Hg below in one patient to 58 mm Hg above the mercury reading in another. The sensitivity of the Vita-Stat in correctly diagnosing hypertension was 0.26; the negative predictive value was 0.45.
Conclusions
Our data suggest that the Vita-Stat is not only inconsistent but inaccurate in measuring blood pressure in the ambulatory patient and is, therefore, not appropriate to use as a monitoring device.
Author Affiliations
From the Division of Internal Medicine (Drs Whitcomb and Byyny and Ms LoVerde), University Hospital (Dr Prochazka), Veterans Affairs Hospital, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Health Sciences Center, Denver.
THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES
|
Barriers to Contraceptive Use in Product Labeling and Practice Guidelines
Grossman et al.
AJPH 2006;96:791-799.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Recommendations for Blood Pressure Measurement in Humans and Experimental Animals: Part 1: Blood Pressure Measurement in Humans: A Statement for Professionals From the Subcommittee of Professional and Public Education of the American Heart Association Council on High Blood Pressure Research
Pickering et al.
Circulation 2005;111:697-716.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Recommendations for Blood Pressure Measurement in Humans and Experimental Animals: Part 1: Blood Pressure Measurement in Humans: A Statement for Professionals From the Subcommittee of Professional and Public Education of the American Heart Association Council on High Blood Pressure Research
Pickering et al.
Hypertension 2005;45:142-161.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Evaluation of a community-based automated blood pressure measuring device
Lewis et al.
CMAJ 2002;166:1145-1148.
ABSTRACT
| FULL TEXT
Home Blood Pressure Monitoring
Yarows et al.
Arch Intern Med 2000;160:1251-1257.
FULL TEXT
|
