JAMA & ARCHIVES
Arch Fam Med
SEARCH
GO TO ADVANCED SEARCH
HOME  PAST ISSUES  TOPIC COLLECTIONS  CME  PHYSICIAN JOBS  CONTACT US  HELP
Institution: CLOCKSS  | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In
  Vol. 7 No. 5, September 1998 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
 • Online Features
  Series on Practice Management
 This Article
 •Full text
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (13)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Immunization
 •Quality of Care, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Assessing Quality of Care via HEDIS 3.0

Is There a Better Way?

Arch G. Mainous III, PhD; Jeffery Talbert, PhD

Arch Fam Med. 1998;7:410-413.

Patients, employers, and third-party payers are all calling for improved measures of health care quality. This has led to the development of "report cards," assessments that are many times applied not just to health plans but also to providers. One attempt at creating a standardized set of quality and effectiveness measures is the Health Plan Employer Data and Information Set (HEDIS). The HEDIS measures are based primarily on analyses of administrative data sets. Problems with HEDIS measures, including the probability that plans will use different data collection methods and a lack of risk adjustment, may result in incorrect conclusions about the quality of care delivered by various providers. An alternative method of standardized surveys is proposed that will overcome many of the limitations of the current HEDIS measures, provide outcome rather than process data, and provide data for developing interventions to improve quality.


From the Department of Family Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston (Dr Mainous) and the Martin School for Public Policy, University of Kentucky, Lexington (Dr Talbert).



THIS ARTICLE HAS BEEN CITED BY OTHER ARTICLES

Are Claims Data Accurate Enough to Identify Patients for Performance Measures or Quality Improvement? The Case of Diabetes, Heart Disease, and Depression
Solberg et al.
American Journal of Medical Quality 2006;21:238-245.
ABSTRACT  

Interactive Voice Response Reminder Effects on Preventive Service Utilization
Crawford et al.
American Journal of Medical Quality 2005;20:329-336.
ABSTRACT  

Is Risk-Adjustor Selection More Important Than Statistical Approach for Provider Profiling? Asthma as an Example
Huang et al.
Med Decis Making 2005;25:20-34.
ABSTRACT  

Can We Be Certain of PRO Accuracy and Accountability? Inaccurate "Report Cards" Generated by Medicare Claims Data as a Marker for Laboratory Testing in Diabetic Patients
Gruber and Rudnitsky
American Journal of Medical Quality 2002;17:171-174.
ABSTRACT  

Using Artificial Neural Networks and the Gutenberg-Richter Power Law to "Rightsize" a Behavioral Health Care System
Davis and Lowell
American Journal of Medical Quality 1999;14:216-228.
ABSTRACT  

Measuring the Health of Seniors
Cooper
Arch Fam Med 1998;7:415-416.
FULL TEXT  




HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1998 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.

DCSIMG