JAMA & ARCHIVES
Arch Fam Med
SEARCH
GO TO ADVANCED SEARCH
HOME  PAST ISSUES  TOPIC COLLECTIONS  CME  PHYSICIAN JOBS  CONTACT US  HELP
Institution: STANFORD Univ Med Center  | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In
  Vol. 9 No. 9, September 2000 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Editorial
 This Article
 •PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in this journal
 Topic Collections
 •Psychiatry
 •Depression
 •Stress
 •Violence and Human Rights
 •Violence and Human Rights, Other
 •Alert me on articles by topic

Social, Cultural, and Clinical Dimensions of Traumatic Experiences of Primary Care Patients

Arch Fam Med. 2000;9:812-813.

THE ARTICLE by Holman et al1 provides further evidence of the disturbing reality that a majority of individuals in the United States experience a traumatic event at some point in their lifetime. Moreover, while previous studies have documented a clear dose-response relationship between such events and the risk of posttraumatic stress disorder,2 this study demonstrates that victims of traumatic experiences are also more likely to have a psychiatric disorder other than posttraumatic stress disorder.

While no one is immune to the likelihood of experiencing a traumatic event, some segments of our society are at greater risk for such experiences, as well as for the development of trauma-related psychiatric disorders. These segments have traditionally been categorized as being of low socioeconomic status,3-4 nonwhite minorities,5-6 and refugees fleeing ethnic strife, civil or international conflicts, and political or religious persecution.7-8 These segments are also less likely to have a regular source of primary care because of a lack of adequate health insurance or access to health services.9

The reasons for this increased vulnerability, however, remain poorly understood. One of the classic debates surrounding the causes of psychiatric disorders among low-income patients has been the direction of causality in this relationship (ie, social selection vs causation).10 For some, the disability associated with psychiatric disorders often results in unemployment and loss of income, or exclusion from the community. Hence, these individuals have low social and economic standing or become immigrants by virtue of their disorder. For others, being of low socioeconomic status and/or an immigrant adds to the risk of experiencing a psychiatric disorder subsequent to a traumatic experience. These individuals often live in threatening situations and lack the material and social resources to shield themselves from traumatic experiences or to successfully cope with their aftermath. The traumatic experience is further complicated by other stressors related to poverty, hazardous occupational and residential environments, and acculturation.

Holman and colleagues do little to resolve this debate because their cross-sectional design does not enable us to identify the direction of causality in this sample of primary care patients. Nevertheless, their study clearly reveals the effect of this association on the delivery of primary care to these segments of the population. Although the prevalence of lifetime (57%) and past-year (10%) traumatic experiences is consistent with that observed in more representative samples of the general population,2, 6 the rates of lifetime and past-year psychiatric disorder are much higher than those reported in other studies of primary care patients.11-12 In other words, the increased risk of developing a psychiatric disorder subsequent to a traumatic event may be more relevant here than the event itself.

Furthermore, the results of this study show that not all immigrant and other low-income patients are alike with respect to the experience of trauma or trauma-related psychiatric disorders. With the exception of slightly higher rates of domestic violence, Mexican immigrants in this study appear to have experienced fewer traumatic events than immigrants from Central America. With the exception of higher rates of war-related violence and other traumatic experiences, Latino immigrants reported fewer experiences with interpersonal violence than US-born Latinos. With minor variations, US-born Latinos and non-Latinos experience similar levels of interpersonal violence. The experience of trauma also changes throughout time. Immigrants from Central America are significantly more likely to have experienced a traumatic experience in their lifetime than US-born whites. However, while not significantly different, they are less than half as likely to have experienced a recent traumatic event. In each instance, location, reflected either in terms of place of origin or current residence, seems to exert a stronger influence than ethnicity on the risk of experiencing a traumatic event, while socioeconomic status, reflected primarily in terms of employment status, seems to exert a stronger influence than ethnicity on the risk of experiencing a psychiatric disorder that is independent of a traumatic event. The differences in the experience of traumatic events and the vulnerability to trauma-related psychiatric disorders lend support to the argument that these disorders model and articulate broader social phenomena, serving as metaphors for one another.13-14

Both the scope of the problem and the differences exhibited between patients presumed to be at risk by virtue of their immigrant or socioeconomic status dictate a need for family physicians and other primary care providers to screen low-income patients for trauma-related psychiatric disorders. Such patients are more likely to understand and express their disorders in somatic terms and, in combination with the stigma often attached to the concept of "mental" illness and limited access to health care, thereby more likely to seek relief for their illness by visiting a primary care provider rather than a mental health specialist.15 A primary care physician's lack of understanding of the patient's explanatory model, especially that of immigrant patients, language, or culturally and socially influenced patterns of symptom expression, make the task of accurately diagnosing the problem and implementing an effective solution somewhat problematic.16 The treatment of even seemingly manageable health problems like high blood pressure, diabetes, asthma, or otitis media, becomes quite complicated when the likelihood of compliance with treatment regimens is threatened by the neuropsychiatric deficits associated with posttraumatic stress disorder.17-18

However, increased screening of low-income, medically underserved primary care patients for trauma-related psychiatric disorders is only part of the solution. A certain level of cultural competency is required for the diagnosis and treatment of trauma-related psychiatric disorders and other illnesses in these patients, especially those who are immigrants to the United States. This competency includes the application of culturally appropriate screening and diagnostic instruments and protocols, the understanding of patient explanatory models, and the use of negotiation skills to address both explanatory models and management options.19-20 Most importantly, culturally competent delivery of health care to these patients requires an understanding of the larger social context in which traumatic experiences and vulnerability to psychiatric disorders subsequent to these experiences occur. Without such an understanding, these disorders will remain undetected and untreated.

Lawrence A. Palinkas, PhD
Immigrant/Refugee Health Studies Program
Department of Family and Preventive Medicine
University of California, San Diego
La Jolla, CA 92093-0807


REFERENCES

1. Holman EA, Silver RC, Waitzkin H. Traumatic life events in primary care patients: a study in an ethnically diverse sample. Arch Fam Med. 2000;9:802-810. FREE FULL TEXT
2. Breslau N, Davis GC, Andreski P. Traumatic events and posttraumatic stress disorder in an urban population of young adults. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1991;48:216-222. FREE FULL TEXT
3. Davidson JRT, Hughes D, Blazer D, George LK. Post traumatic stress disorder in the community: an epidemiologic study. Psychol Med. 1991;21:1-9. ISI | PUBMED
4. Kulka R, Schlenger WE, Fairbank JA, et al. Trauma and the Vietnam War Generation. Report of Findings From the National Vietnam Veterans Readjustment Study. New York, NY: Brunner/Mazel; 1990.
5. Breslau N, Davis GC, Andreski P. Risk factors for PTSD-related traumatic events: a prospective analysis. Am J Psychiatry. 1995;152:529-535. FREE FULL TEXT
6. Norris F. Epidemiology of trauma: frequency and impact of different potentially traumatic events on different demographic groups. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1992;60:409-418. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
7. Kinzie JD, Boehnlein JK, Leung PK, Moore LJ, Riley C, Smith D. The prevalence of posttraumatic stress disorder and its clinical significance in southeast Asian refugees. Am J Psychiatry. 1990;147:913-917. FREE FULL TEXT
8. Mollica RF, McInnes K, Sarajliac N, et al. Disability associated with psychiatric comorbidity and health status in Bosnian refugees living in Croatia. JAMA. 1999;282:433-439. FREE FULL TEXT
9. Forrest CB, Starfield B. Entry into primary care and continuity: the effects of access. Am J Public Health. 1998;88:1330-1336. FREE FULL TEXT
10. Dohrenwend BP, Levav I, Shrout PE, et al. Socioeconomic status and psychiatric disorders: the causation-selection issue. Science. 1992;255:946-952. FREE FULL TEXT
11. Katon W, Schulberg H. Epidemiology of depression in primary care. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 1992;14:237-247. FULL TEXT | ISI | PUBMED
12. Higgens ES. A review of unrecognized mental illness in primary care: prevalence, natural history, and efforts to change the course. Arch Fam Med. 1995;4:99-105. FREE FULL TEXT
13. Kleinman A. Writing at the Margin: Discourse Between Anthropology and Medicine. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1995.
14. Palinkas LA. Health under stress: Asian and Central American refugees and those left behind: introduction. Soc Sci Med. 1995;40:1591-1596.
15. Kleinman A, Eisenberg L, Good B. Culture, illness, and care: clinical lessons from anthropologic and cross-cultural research. Ann Intern Med. 1978;88:251-258.
16. Kroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB, et al. Physical symptoms in primary care: predictors of psychiatric disorders and functional impairment. Arch Fam Med. 1994;3:774-779. FREE FULL TEXT
17. Samson AY, Bensen S, Beck A, Price D, Nimmer C. Posttraumatic stress disorder in primary care. J Fam Pract. 1999;48:222-227. ISI | PUBMED
18. Friedman MJ. Posttraumatic stress disorder. J Clin Psychiatry. 1997;58(suppl 9):33-36.
19. Carillo JE, Green AR, Betancourt JR. Cross-cultural primary care: a patient-based approach. Ann Intern Med. 1999;130:829-834. FREE FULL TEXT
20. Like RC, Steiner RP, Rubel AJ. Recommended core curriculum guidelines on culturally sensitive and competent health care. Fam Med. 1996;27:291-297.

RELATED ARTICLE

Traumatic Life Events in Primary Care Patients: A Study in an Ethnically Diverse Sample
E. Alison Holman, Roxane Cohen Silver, and Howard Waitzkin
Arch Fam Med. 2000;9(9):802-810.
ABSTRACT | FULL TEXT  





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 2000 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.