JAMA & ARCHIVES
Arch Fam Med
SEARCH
GO TO ADVANCED SEARCH
HOME  PAST ISSUES  TOPIC COLLECTIONS  CME  PHYSICIAN JOBS  CONTACT US  HELP
Institution: STANFORD Univ Med Center  | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In
  Vol. 2 No. 5, May 1993 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Letters to the Editor
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Corporal Punishment

Patrick F. Mongan, MD
Medical College of Georgia Augusta, Ga

Arch Fam Med. 1993;2(5):469.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Congratulations your new journal. Most of the articles were interesting and of value, but I was disappointed in the Commentary by McCormick.1 He states that "... corporal punishment is a violence problem."1 He also asks questions in the Commentary that appear to impugn the motives and character of everyone who supports corporal punishment. One may believe violence is necessary in some circumstances without "glorifying" it. His own survey shows that the majority of pediatricians and family physicians support spanking in certain situations. Spanking was defined as "striking of the child's buttocks or hand with an open hand, lightly, leaving no mark except transient redness."2 McCormick also mentions a survey of psychologists in which the majority used corporal punishment in their own home. I find it interesting that he wants society to outlaw something that has been around for hundreds of years and is believed to be useful by . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1993 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.