JAMA & ARCHIVES
Arch Fam Med
SEARCH
GO TO ADVANCED SEARCH
HOME  PAST ISSUES  TOPIC COLLECTIONS  CME  PHYSICIAN JOBS  CONTACT US  HELP
Institution: STANFORD Univ Med Center  | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In
  Vol. 2 No. 5, May 1993 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Letters to the Editor
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Corporal Punishment

David M. Moore, MD
Kern Medical Center Bakersfield, Calif

Arch Fam Med. 1993;2(5):469-470.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

In his Commentary on corporal punishment, McCormick1 states: "Any adult-child interaction that could be called corporal punishment would be considered illegal battery if it took place between adults," and "without question corporal punishment is a violence problem." However, corporal punishment is not violence. It is the use of pain for the purpose of training children so that they will avoid behaviors that would bring them greater pain (whether physical or not) in the future. If any pain inflicted on a child is violence and therefore unjustifiable, then certainly immunization of children by injection is unjustifiable violence as well. This type of immunization involves the premeditated infliction of pain, with the use of physical restraint, to inject a foreign substance by means of a sharp object in order to permanently alter the child's immune system. All this is done against the child's will and in the face of his or . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1993 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.