JAMA & ARCHIVES
Arch Fam Med
SEARCH
GO TO ADVANCED SEARCH
HOME  PAST ISSUES  TOPIC COLLECTIONS  CME  PHYSICIAN JOBS  CONTACT US  HELP
Institution: CLOCKSS  | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In
  Vol. 3 No. 7, July 1994 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
 • Online Features
  Letters to the Editor
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Empiric Antibiotics in Sinusitis

Anthony J. Geraci, Jr, MD
Central Carolina Emergency Physicians, PA Sanford, NC

Arch Fam Med. 1994;3(7):573.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

The recent study by Calhoun and Hokanson1 was well designed and carried out. A careful reading of the paper provides practicing primary care physicians with helpful information in choosing antibiotics for their patients with acute sinusitis.

I disagree, however, with the wording of the conclusion, which states, "In conclusion, clarithromycin (500 mg twice daily) is an appropriate agent for the empiric treatment of acute maxillary sinusitis." The title and conduct of the study implied a comparison of two drugs; to conclude in the final sentence of the article (as well as in the abstract) about only one of the drugs is misleading.

A more consistent and correct conclusion would be "Clarithromycin and amoxicillin are equally effective agents for the empiric treatment of acute maxillary sinusitis." To which I might add, "Because amoxicillin is far less expensive than clarithromycin, it should be the agent of choice in the empiric treatment . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1994 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.

DCSIMG