JAMA & ARCHIVES
Arch Fam Med
SEARCH
GO TO ADVANCED SEARCH
HOME  PAST ISSUES  TOPIC COLLECTIONS  CME  PHYSICIAN JOBS  CONTACT US  HELP
Institution: CLOCKSS  | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In
  Vol. 4 No. 7, July 1995 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Letters to the Editor
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Catch-22 and Physician-Assisted Suicide-Reply

William A. Hensel, MD
Family Practice Center Greensboro, NC

Arch Fam Med. 1995;4(7):581-582.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

In reply

I thank Standke for the opportunity to clarify some points in "Dr Aesop." I agree wholeheartedly with his assertions that physicians have an obligation to comply with their patients' wishes and that "patients always have the right to refuse care." Where we apparently disagree is how much ambiguity is present in the patient I described. Standke likens Mrs Delaney's situation to that of his patient, yet the two cases differ in three fundamental ways. First, the patient of Standke wanted to discontinue a medical intervention, the ventilator, which was certainly her right. Mrs Delaney wanted me to prescribe a lethal dose of sleeping pills or administer a lethal injection of narcotics for the expressed purpose of ending her life—a fact to which I only allude in the story. In short, she wanted me to cross a line, currently forbidden in my state, and enter the territory of physician-assisted suicide. The . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1995 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.