JAMA & ARCHIVES
Arch Fam Med
SEARCH
GO TO ADVANCED SEARCH
HOME  PAST ISSUES  TOPIC COLLECTIONS  CME  PHYSICIAN JOBS  CONTACT US  HELP
Institution: CLOCKSS  | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In
  Vol. 4 No. 8, August 1995 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Archives
  •  Online Features
  Letters to the Editor
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in this journal

Pharmacoeconomic Considerations in Pharmaceutical Company Promotions

Gerald B. Rosenberg
Bayer Corporation West Haven, Conn

Arch Fam Med. 1995;4(8):674-675.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

On behalf of Bayer Corporation (formerly known as Miles Inc), I would like to make two points in response to the letter by Goldstein and Ives1 published in the December 1994 issue of the ARCHIVES.

First, independent data on pharmacy transactions from retail pharmacy computer systems across the country show that the 25% wholesale discount we offer on Adalat CC in comparison with Procardia XL is, in varying degrees depending on local pharmacist practice, passed on to consumers overall. Average monthly retail cost savings for a patient buying Adalat CC versus Procardia XL range, on average, from $8 at the 30-mg dose to $14 at the 60-mg dose to $16 at the 90-mg dose, which yield annual savings ranging from $77 to $2372 (Table).

Average wholesale price is used to calculate the cost comparison between Adalat CC and the other extendedrelease nifedipine . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | PHYSICIAN JOBS | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1995 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.