<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE Publisher PUBLIC "-//MetaPress//DTD MetaPress 2.0//EN" "http://public.metapress.com/dtd/MPRESS/MetaPressv2.dtd">
<Publisher>
	<PublisherInfo>
		<PublisherName>Baywood Publishing Company</PublisherName>
	</PublisherInfo>
	<Journal>
		<JournalInfo JournalType="Journals">
			<JournalPrintISSN>2167-7816</JournalPrintISSN>
			<JournalElectronicISSN>2167-7824</JournalElectronicISSN>
			<JournalTitle>Journal of Collective Negotiations (formerly Journal of Collective Negotiations in the Public Sector)</JournalTitle>
			<JournalCode>BWCN</JournalCode>
			<JournalID>300318</JournalID>
			<JournalURL>http://baywood.metapress.com/link.asp?target=journal&amp;id=300318</JournalURL>
		</JournalInfo>
		<Volume>
			<VolumeInfo>
				<VolumeNumber>11</VolumeNumber>
			</VolumeInfo>
			<Issue>
				<IssueInfo IssueType="Regular">
					<IssueNumberBegin>4</IssueNumberBegin>
					<IssueNumberEnd>4</IssueNumberEnd>
					<IssueSupplement>0</IssueSupplement>
					<IssuePartStart>0</IssuePartStart>
					<IssuePartEnd>0</IssuePartEnd>
					<IssueSequence>000011000419821201</IssueSequence>
					<IssuePublicationDate>
						<CoverDate Year="1982" Month="12" Day="1"/>
						<CoverDisplay>Number 4/1982</CoverDisplay>
					</IssuePublicationDate>
					<IssueID>RXMKU57F7VD4</IssueID>
					<IssueURL>http://baywood.metapress.com/link.asp?target=issue&amp;id=RXMKU57F7VD4</IssueURL>
				</IssueInfo>
				<Article ArticleType="Original">
					<ArticleInfo Free="No" ESM="No">
						<ArticleDOI>10.2190/72DA-K7AU-H9T9-5M9L</ArticleDOI>
						<ArticlePII>72DAK7AUH9T95M9L</ArticlePII>
						<ArticleSequenceNumber>0</ArticleSequenceNumber>
						<ArticleTitle Language="En">A CASE STUDY OF LABOR LAW IN THE PUBLIC SECTOR</ArticleTitle>
						<ArticleFirstPage/>
						<ArticleLastPage/>
						<ArticleHistory>
							<RegistrationDate>20020509</RegistrationDate>
							<ReceivedDate>20020509</ReceivedDate>
							<Accepted>20020509</Accepted>
							<OnlineDate>20020509</OnlineDate>
						</ArticleHistory>
						<FullTextURL>http://baywood.metapress.com/link.asp?target=contribution&amp;id=72DAK7AUH9T95M9L</FullTextURL>
						<Composite>4</Composite>
					</ArticleInfo>
					<ArticleHeader>
						<AuthorGroup>
							<Author>
								<GivenName>ROBERT N. HORN AND JOSEPH M. TOMKIEWICZ</GivenName>
								<Initials/>
								<FamilyName/>
								<Degrees/>
								<Roles/>
							</Author>
						</AuthorGroup>
						<Abstract Language="En">The passage of Pennsylvania Public Employee Relations Act (Act 195) was enthusiastically welcomed by public sector employees. It was perceived by labor as emancipating legislation giving them, for the first time, the right to co-determine with the state wages and working conditions. The legalization of strikes gave labor the potential of meaningful bargaining power with which to achieve goals. However, Act 195 has been emasculated through adverse court decisions. As a result, public employees in Pennsylvania may have to develop alternative strategies in order to achieve some greater control over their work lives. Apparently, they cannot rely solely on the state to act as an impartial mediator between labor management.</Abstract>
					</ArticleHeader>
				</Article>
			</Issue>
		</Volume>
	</Journal>
</Publisher>
