<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE Publisher PUBLIC "-//MetaPress//DTD MetaPress 2.0//EN" "http://public.metapress.com/dtd/MPRESS/MetaPressv2.dtd">
<Publisher>
	<PublisherInfo>
		<PublisherName>Baywood Publishing Company</PublisherName>
	</PublisherInfo>
	<Journal>
		<JournalInfo JournalType="Journals">
			<JournalPrintISSN>2167-7816</JournalPrintISSN>
			<JournalElectronicISSN>2167-7824</JournalElectronicISSN>
			<JournalTitle>Journal of Collective Negotiations (formerly Journal of Collective Negotiations in the Public Sector)</JournalTitle>
			<JournalCode>BWCN</JournalCode>
			<JournalID>300318</JournalID>
			<JournalURL>http://baywood.metapress.com/link.asp?target=journal&amp;id=300318</JournalURL>
		</JournalInfo>
		<Volume>
			<VolumeInfo>
				<VolumeNumber>15</VolumeNumber>
			</VolumeInfo>
			<Issue>
				<IssueInfo IssueType="Regular">
					<IssueNumberBegin>2</IssueNumberBegin>
					<IssueNumberEnd>2</IssueNumberEnd>
					<IssueSupplement>0</IssueSupplement>
					<IssuePartStart>0</IssuePartStart>
					<IssuePartEnd>0</IssuePartEnd>
					<IssueSequence>000015000219860601</IssueSequence>
					<IssuePublicationDate>
						<CoverDate Year="1986" Month="6" Day="1"/>
						<CoverDisplay>Number 2/1986</CoverDisplay>
					</IssuePublicationDate>
					<IssueID>HBXPWVX0MWA4</IssueID>
					<IssueURL>http://baywood.metapress.com/link.asp?target=issue&amp;id=HBXPWVX0MWA4</IssueURL>
				</IssueInfo>
				<Article ArticleType="Original">
					<ArticleInfo Free="No" ESM="No">
						<ArticleDOI>10.2190/9QX2-0MP3-PQYE-19JU</ArticleDOI>
						<ArticlePII>9QX20MP3PQYE19JU</ArticlePII>
						<ArticleSequenceNumber>0</ArticleSequenceNumber>
						<ArticleTitle Language="En">CONVERGENCE AS A THEORY OF THE PUBLIC SECTOR LABOR PHENOMENON: A CRITIQUE</ArticleTitle>
						<ArticleFirstPage/>
						<ArticleLastPage/>
						<ArticleHistory>
							<RegistrationDate>20020509</RegistrationDate>
							<ReceivedDate>20020509</ReceivedDate>
							<Accepted>20020509</Accepted>
							<OnlineDate>20020509</OnlineDate>
						</ArticleHistory>
						<FullTextURL>http://baywood.metapress.com/link.asp?target=contribution&amp;id=9QX20MP3PQYE19JU</FullTextURL>
						<Composite>2</Composite>
					</ArticleInfo>
					<ArticleHeader>
						<AuthorGroup>
							<Author>
								<GivenName>LON FELKER</GivenName>
								<Initials/>
								<FamilyName/>
								<Degrees/>
								<Roles/>
							</Author>
						</AuthorGroup>
						<Abstract Language="En">The theory of convergence proposes that public and private sector labor relations are on a similar track in their development. It is a holistic theory that similarities between the two sectors point to a parallel course in terms of policy, structure, and function. This article critiques the theory, noting problems with its theoretical formulation, conceptualization, and operationalization. The empirical evidence offered in support of the theory by its proponents is also examined and critiqued. The basic conclusions drawn from this critique are that convergence theory, as a theory, is too broadly delineated, and that the evidence offered in support of the theory is frequently open to multiple interpretation, and at times direct refutation. In short, convergence theory does not provide a holistic or convincing model of public sector labor relations.</Abstract>
					</ArticleHeader>
				</Article>
			</Issue>
		</Volume>
	</Journal>
</Publisher>
