<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE Publisher PUBLIC "-//MetaPress//DTD MetaPress 2.0//EN" "http://public.metapress.com/dtd/MPRESS/MetaPressv2.dtd">
<Publisher>
	<PublisherInfo>
		<PublisherName>Baywood Publishing Company</PublisherName>
	</PublisherInfo>
	<Journal>
		<JournalInfo JournalType="Journals">
			<JournalPrintISSN>2167-7816</JournalPrintISSN>
			<JournalElectronicISSN>2167-7824</JournalElectronicISSN>
			<JournalTitle>Journal of Collective Negotiations (formerly Journal of Collective Negotiations in the Public Sector)</JournalTitle>
			<JournalCode>BWCN</JournalCode>
			<JournalID>300318</JournalID>
			<JournalURL>http://baywood.metapress.com/link.asp?target=journal&amp;id=300318</JournalURL>
		</JournalInfo>
		<Volume>
			<VolumeInfo>
				<VolumeNumber>17</VolumeNumber>
			</VolumeInfo>
			<Issue>
				<IssueInfo IssueType="Regular">
					<IssueNumberBegin>3</IssueNumberBegin>
					<IssueNumberEnd>3</IssueNumberEnd>
					<IssueSupplement>0</IssueSupplement>
					<IssuePartStart>0</IssuePartStart>
					<IssuePartEnd>0</IssuePartEnd>
					<IssueSequence>000017000319880901</IssueSequence>
					<IssuePublicationDate>
						<CoverDate Year="1988" Month="9" Day="1"/>
						<CoverDisplay>Number 3/1988</CoverDisplay>
					</IssuePublicationDate>
					<IssueID>5GNFYAW6L72E</IssueID>
					<IssueURL>http://baywood.metapress.com/link.asp?target=issue&amp;id=5GNFYAW6L72E</IssueURL>
				</IssueInfo>
				<Article ArticleType="Original">
					<ArticleInfo Free="No" ESM="No">
						<ArticleDOI>10.2190/YH3C-DG56-JKT0-5KTK</ArticleDOI>
						<ArticlePII>YH3CDG56JKT05KTK</ArticlePII>
						<ArticleSequenceNumber>0</ArticleSequenceNumber>
						<ArticleTitle Language="En">DRUG TESTING: THE MORAL, CONSTITUTIONAL, AND ACCURACY ISSUES</ArticleTitle>
						<ArticleFirstPage/>
						<ArticleLastPage/>
						<ArticleHistory>
							<RegistrationDate>20020509</RegistrationDate>
							<ReceivedDate>20020509</ReceivedDate>
							<Accepted>20020509</Accepted>
							<OnlineDate>20020509</OnlineDate>
						</ArticleHistory>
						<FullTextURL>http://baywood.metapress.com/link.asp?target=contribution&amp;id=YH3CDG56JKT05KTK</FullTextURL>
						<Composite>3</Composite>
					</ArticleInfo>
					<ArticleHeader>
						<AuthorGroup>
							<Author>
								<GivenName>SAMI M. ABBASI, KENNETH W. HOLLMAN, AND JOE H. MURREY JR.</GivenName>
								<Initials/>
								<FamilyName/>
								<Degrees/>
								<Roles/>
							</Author>
						</AuthorGroup>
						<Abstract Language="En">Despite problems with testing inaccuracies, an increasing number of private companies and governments are implementing drug testing procedures for prospective and current employees at every level. Governmental units face stiffer legal challenges in defending their drug testing programs than do private employers. Nevertheless, the courts generally permit governmental units to test in those cases where intrusion into worker privacy is minimal and where public safety is involved. A major concern over drug testing in both the public and private sectors is the human cost (e.g., embarrassment, invasion of privacy) involved, which must be weighed against the value of the information received. Employers can combat the drug abuse problem through deterrence by educational programs, the creation of confidence between workers and management, and treatment for affected workers.</Abstract>
					</ArticleHeader>
				</Article>
			</Issue>
		</Volume>
	</Journal>
</Publisher>
