<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE Publisher PUBLIC "-//MetaPress//DTD MetaPress 2.0//EN" "http://public.metapress.com/dtd/MPRESS/MetaPressv2.dtd">
<Publisher>
	<PublisherInfo>
		<PublisherName>Baywood Publishing Company</PublisherName>
	</PublisherInfo>
	<Journal>
		<JournalInfo JournalType="Journals">
			<JournalPrintISSN>2167-7816</JournalPrintISSN>
			<JournalElectronicISSN>2167-7824</JournalElectronicISSN>
			<JournalTitle>Journal of Collective Negotiations (formerly Journal of Collective Negotiations in the Public Sector)</JournalTitle>
			<JournalCode>BWCN</JournalCode>
			<JournalID>300318</JournalID>
			<JournalURL>http://baywood.metapress.com/link.asp?target=journal&amp;id=300318</JournalURL>
		</JournalInfo>
		<Volume>
			<VolumeInfo>
				<VolumeNumber>18</VolumeNumber>
			</VolumeInfo>
			<Issue>
				<IssueInfo IssueType="Regular">
					<IssueNumberBegin>2</IssueNumberBegin>
					<IssueNumberEnd>2</IssueNumberEnd>
					<IssueSupplement>0</IssueSupplement>
					<IssuePartStart>0</IssuePartStart>
					<IssuePartEnd>0</IssuePartEnd>
					<IssueSequence>000018000219890601</IssueSequence>
					<IssuePublicationDate>
						<CoverDate Year="1989" Month="6" Day="1"/>
						<CoverDisplay>Number 2/1989</CoverDisplay>
					</IssuePublicationDate>
					<IssueID>5VUH955MBFRA</IssueID>
					<IssueURL>http://baywood.metapress.com/link.asp?target=issue&amp;id=5VUH955MBFRA</IssueURL>
				</IssueInfo>
				<Article ArticleType="Original">
					<ArticleInfo Free="No" ESM="No">
						<ArticleDOI>10.2190/0QHY-8NXR-8KR3-RWRM</ArticleDOI>
						<ArticlePII>0QHY8NXR8KR3RWRM</ArticlePII>
						<ArticleSequenceNumber>0</ArticleSequenceNumber>
						<ArticleTitle Language="En">RECONCILING &quot;GETTING TO YES&quot; AND THE BEHAVIORAL MODEL OF COLLECTIVE BARGAINING: A TWO-PIE APPROACH</ArticleTitle>
						<ArticleFirstPage/>
						<ArticleLastPage/>
						<ArticleHistory>
							<RegistrationDate>20020509</RegistrationDate>
							<ReceivedDate>20020509</ReceivedDate>
							<Accepted>20020509</Accepted>
							<OnlineDate>20020509</OnlineDate>
						</ArticleHistory>
						<FullTextURL>http://baywood.metapress.com/link.asp?target=contribution&amp;id=0QHY8NXR8KR3RWRM</FullTextURL>
						<Composite>2</Composite>
					</ArticleInfo>
					<ArticleHeader>
						<AuthorGroup>
							<Author>
								<GivenName>LEONARD B. MANDELBAUM</GivenName>
								<Initials/>
								<FamilyName/>
								<Degrees/>
								<Roles/>
							</Author>
						</AuthorGroup>
						<Abstract Language="En">Can the nonadversial problem-solving strategies of &lt;em&gt;Getting to Yes&lt;/em&gt; (Fisher/Ury) be applied effectively in collective bargaining where, frequently, trust levels are low and power may not be equally balanced? This article is a participant/observer case study of a lengthy contract negotiation in a public hospital. While it confirms previous research about the difficulties of implementing win/win approaches, the author finds that prebargaining training of at least one party and careful selection of issues makes a difference. At least where relationships are not hostile, partial application of integrative (win/win) bargaining techniques did work.</Abstract>
					</ArticleHeader>
				</Article>
			</Issue>
		</Volume>
	</Journal>
</Publisher>
