<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE Publisher PUBLIC "-//MetaPress//DTD MetaPress 2.0//EN" "http://public.metapress.com/dtd/MPRESS/MetaPressv2.dtd">
<Publisher>
	<PublisherInfo>
		<PublisherName>Baywood Publishing Company</PublisherName>
	</PublisherInfo>
	<Journal>
		<JournalInfo JournalType="Journals">
			<JournalPrintISSN>2167-7816</JournalPrintISSN>
			<JournalElectronicISSN>2167-7824</JournalElectronicISSN>
			<JournalTitle>Journal of Collective Negotiations (formerly Journal of Collective Negotiations in the Public Sector)</JournalTitle>
			<JournalCode>BWCN</JournalCode>
			<JournalID>300318</JournalID>
			<JournalURL>http://baywood.metapress.com/link.asp?target=journal&amp;id=300318</JournalURL>
		</JournalInfo>
		<Volume>
			<VolumeInfo>
				<VolumeNumber>29</VolumeNumber>
			</VolumeInfo>
			<Issue>
				<IssueInfo IssueType="Regular">
					<IssueNumberBegin>4</IssueNumberBegin>
					<IssueNumberEnd>4</IssueNumberEnd>
					<IssueSupplement>0</IssueSupplement>
					<IssuePartStart>0</IssuePartStart>
					<IssuePartEnd>0</IssuePartEnd>
					<IssueSequence>000029000420001201</IssueSequence>
					<IssuePublicationDate>
						<CoverDate Year="2000" Month="12" Day="1"/>
						<CoverDisplay>Number 4/2000</CoverDisplay>
					</IssuePublicationDate>
					<IssueID>DFGCRBEHUR2V</IssueID>
					<IssueURL>http://baywood.metapress.com/link.asp?target=issue&amp;id=DFGCRBEHUR2V</IssueURL>
				</IssueInfo>
				<Article ArticleType="Original">
					<ArticleInfo Free="No" ESM="No">
						<ArticleDOI>10.2190/Y2MN-MH00-D6G5-5A6G</ArticleDOI>
						<ArticlePII>Y2MNMH00D6G55A6G</ArticlePII>
						<ArticleSequenceNumber>321</ArticleSequenceNumber>
						<ArticleTitle Language="En">Review of Traditional and Collaborative Models for Negotiation</ArticleTitle>
						<ArticleFirstPage>321</ArticleFirstPage>
						<ArticleLastPage>335</ArticleLastPage>
						<ArticleHistory>
							<RegistrationDate>20020509</RegistrationDate>
							<ReceivedDate>20020509</ReceivedDate>
							<Accepted>20020509</Accepted>
							<OnlineDate>20020509</OnlineDate>
						</ArticleHistory>
						<FullTextFileName>Y2MNMH00D6G55A6G.pdf</FullTextFileName>
						<FullTextURL>http://baywood.metapress.com/link.asp?target=contribution&amp;id=Y2MNMH00D6G55A6G</FullTextURL>
						<Composite>4</Composite>
					</ArticleInfo>
					<ArticleHeader>
						<AuthorGroup>
							<Author>
								<GivenName>James Kelleher</GivenName>
								<Initials/>
								<FamilyName/>
								<Degrees/>
								<Roles/>
							</Author>
						</AuthorGroup>
						<Abstract Language="En">The literature on collective bargaining in education distinguishes between traditional and collaborative models. The traditional model generally refers to an adversarial approach in which both parties conceal their true goals, each seeking to maximize its share. The collaborative model, on the other hand, is generally based on relationships characterized by mutual trust and open communication. The terms collaborative or traditional bargaining are used frequently, yet they refer to a wide array of different approaches to collective bargaining. This article seeks to develop a deeper understanding of both models by presenting an overview of the critical attributes of traditional and collaborative bargaining models identified in the literature.</Abstract>
					</ArticleHeader>
				</Article>
			</Issue>
		</Volume>
	</Journal>
</Publisher>
