10.2190/CN.31.4.d K0M8344J44029P82 4 Economic Motivation for Post-Tenure Review in Academic Institutions 333 341 20080304 20080304 20080304 20080304 K0M8344J44029P82.pdf http://baywood.metapress.com/link.asp?target=contribution&id=K0M8344J44029P82 4 David A. Dilts Hedayeh Samavati Mashaalah Rahnama-Moghadam Indiana University-Purdue, University-Fort Wayne, Indiana Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas This article examines the post-tenure review process and the economic motivations for post-tenure review. Economic theory suggests that there is a negative relation between compensation levels and tenure contracts. The available evidence shows that there is a negative salary differential between jobs with tenure and jobs without tenure consistent with the predictions of economic theory. This also suggests that, in litigation, the courts will not place a high value on academic tenure. Post-tenure review seems to have two motivations: One is purely economic, and the other is formative, that is, faculty development. The evidence suggests the latter has been effective in improving faculty performance.

S. Dayal, Collective Bargaining among Academic Professionals: An Analysis of Issues and Outcomes, Journal of Collective Negotiations in the Public Sector, 18:3, pp. 207-216, 1989.

J. R. McFerron, R. C. Camp, D. M. Lynch, and J. L. Woods, Tenure Standards Within Statewide Systems of Higher Education: The Collective Bargaining Milieu, Journal of Collective Negotiations in the Public Sector 25:4, pp. 365-375, 1996.

B. A. Garner (ed.), Black's Law Dictionary, pocket edition, St. Paul, Minnesota: West Publishing Group, 1996.

A. Smith, An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations, originally published 1776, reprinted New York: Modern Library, Cannan Edition, 1937, pp. 715-735.

R. Posner, Economic Analysis of Law, Boston: Little Brown and Company, 1986.

American Federation of Teachers, The Vanishing Professor <a target="_blank" href='http://www.aft.org'>www.aft.org</a>

Job Openings for Economists, New York: AEA, 2004, 2005 for November and December 2004, and February and March 2005.

2004-05 Salary Survey Executive Summary, St. Louis: AACSB, December 2004.

J. J. Seigfried and W. A. Stock, The Labor Market for New Ph.D. Economist, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 13:3, pp. 115-134, 1999.

J. J. Seigfried and W. A. Stock, The Labor Market for New Ph.D. Economists in 2002 <a target="_blank" href='http://www.aeaweb.org/joe'>www.aeaweb.org/joe</a>

"Post-Tenure Review: An AAUP Response," report endorsed by AAUP membership at 1999 Annual Meetings. Retrieved from: <a target="_blank" href='http://www.aaup.org/NR/rdonlyres/BBF5E3D5-5A39-4265-B1B9-FD59FE4AC70C/0/PostTenureReviewAnAAUPResponse.pdf'>http://www.aaup.org/NR/rdonlyres/BBF5E3D5-5A39-4265-B1B9-FD59FE4AC70C/0/PostTenureReviewAnAAUPResponse.pdf</a>

"AAU Report on Post Tenure Review," April 10, 2001, Association of American Universities. Retrieved from: <a target="_blank" href='http://www.aau.edu/reports/NonTenure4.01.pdf'>http://www.aau.edu/reports/NonTenure4.01.pdf</a>

University of North Carolina, "Post Tenure Review Report," March 3, 1999. Retrieved from: <a target="_blank" href='http://www.northcarolina.edu/content.php/aa/tenure/reports/report.html'>http://www.northcarolina.edu/content.php/aa/tenure/reports/report.html</a>

C. A. Trower, "Tenure Snapshot," American Association of Higher Education, Washington, D.C.: New Pathways Project, Working Paper No. 2, 1996.

B. J. Harris, "The Relationship between and among Policy Variables, Type of Institution, and Perceptions of Academic Administrators with Regard to Post-Tenure Review," unpublished doctoral dissertation, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia, 1996.

C. Licata and J. Morreale, "Post-tenure Review: Policies, Practices, Precautions," American Association of Higher Education, Washington, D.C.: New Pathway Project, Working Paper No. 12, 1996.

M. J. Goodman, The Review of Tenured Faculty: A Collegial Model, Journal of Higher Education, 61:4, pp. 408-424, July/August 1990.