<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE Publisher PUBLIC "-//MetaPress//DTD MetaPress 2.0//EN" "http://public.metapress.com/dtd/MPRESS/MetaPressv2.dtd">
<Publisher>
	<PublisherInfo>
		<PublisherName>Baywood Publishing Company</PublisherName>
	</PublisherInfo>
	<Journal>
		<JournalInfo JournalType="Journals">
			<JournalPrintISSN>2167-7816</JournalPrintISSN>
			<JournalElectronicISSN>2167-7824</JournalElectronicISSN>
			<JournalTitle>Journal of Collective Negotiations (formerly Journal of Collective Negotiations in the Public Sector)</JournalTitle>
			<JournalCode>BWCN</JournalCode>
			<JournalID>300318</JournalID>
			<JournalURL>http://baywood.metapress.com/link.asp?target=journal&amp;id=300318</JournalURL>
		</JournalInfo>
		<Volume>
			<VolumeInfo>
				<VolumeNumber>31</VolumeNumber>
			</VolumeInfo>
			<Issue>
				<IssueInfo IssueType="Regular">
					<IssueNumberBegin>4</IssueNumberBegin>
					<IssueNumberEnd>4</IssueNumberEnd>
					<IssueSupplement>0</IssueSupplement>
					<IssuePartStart>0</IssuePartStart>
					<IssuePartEnd>0</IssuePartEnd>
					<IssueSequence>000031000420070101</IssueSequence>
					<IssuePublicationDate>
						<CoverDate Year="2007" Month="1" Day="1"/>
						<CoverDisplay>Number 4 / 2007</CoverDisplay>
					</IssuePublicationDate>
					<IssueID>962F1HMB3MYA</IssueID>
					<IssueURL>http://baywood.metapress.com/link.asp?target=issue&amp;id=962F1HMB3MYA</IssueURL>
				</IssueInfo>
				<Article ArticleType="Original">
					<ArticleInfo Free="No" ESM="No">
						<ArticleDOI>10.2190/CN.31.4.e</ArticleDOI>
						<ArticlePII>U455380641253825</ArticlePII>
						<ArticleSequenceNumber>5</ArticleSequenceNumber>
						<ArticleTitle Language="En">Grievance Arbitration Issues in Law Enforcement: The Wisconsin Experience</ArticleTitle>
						<ArticleFirstPage>343</ArticleFirstPage>
						<ArticleLastPage>360</ArticleLastPage>
						<ArticleHistory>
							<RegistrationDate>20080304</RegistrationDate>
							<ReceivedDate>20080304</ReceivedDate>
							<Accepted>20080304</Accepted>
							<OnlineDate>20080304</OnlineDate>
						</ArticleHistory>
						<FullTextFileName>U455380641253825.pdf</FullTextFileName>
						<FullTextURL>http://baywood.metapress.com/link.asp?target=contribution&amp;id=U455380641253825</FullTextURL>
						<Composite>4</Composite>
					</ArticleInfo>
					<ArticleHeader>
						<AuthorGroup>
							<Author AffiliationID="A1">
								<GivenName>Brian</GivenName>
								<Initials>R.</Initials>
								<FamilyName>Johnson</FamilyName>
								<Degrees/>
								<Roles/>
							</Author>
							<Author AffiliationID="A1">
								<GivenName>Doug</GivenName>
								<Initials/>
								<FamilyName>McKenzie</FamilyName>
								<Degrees/>
								<Roles/>
							</Author>
							<Author AffiliationID="A1">
								<GivenName>William</GivenName>
								<Initials/>
								<FamilyName>Crawley</FamilyName>
								<Degrees/>
								<Roles/>
							</Author>
							<Affiliation AFFID="A1">
								<OrgDivision/>
								<OrgName>Grand Valley State University, Michigan</OrgName>
								<OrgAddress/>
							</Affiliation>
						</AuthorGroup>
						<Abstract Language="En">This exploratory study examines grievance arbitration cases involving municipal and county sheriff's law enforcement agencies and unions in Wisconsin that had requested arbitration through the Wisconsin Employment Relations Commission (WERC). Using official data (&lt;i&gt;n&lt;/i&gt; = 141 cases) from WERC for 1994 to 2004, this study provides a profile of the types of cases brought to arbitration in Wisconsin according to dispute or issue, agency, union affiliation, and award outcome. Statistical analysis of the data found that county sheriff's agencies had a statistically significant higher number of cases brought to arbitration in to comparison municipal agencies. When controlling for specific issues, unions were more successful in issues that dealt with economic issues and employee terminations than employers. The findings also show that there were no statistically significant differences between unions affiliated with state-level or national unions in outcome success in comparison to independent-based unions.</Abstract>
					</ArticleHeader>
				</Article>
			</Issue>
		</Volume>
	</Journal>
</Publisher>
