10.2190/5BMW-LWW6-DN9U-XV56 5BMWLWW6DN9UXV56 4 The Urban Growth Issue: Perceptions and Positions 139 147 20020509 20020509 20020509 20020509 5BMWLWW6DN9UXV56.pdf http://baywood.metapress.com/link.asp?target=contribution&id=5BMWLWW6DN9UXV56 2 Paul J. Strand Department of Political Science, San Diego State University This study investigates urban residents positions on the issue of restrictive growth. The relationship between positions on this issue and support for the mere general issue of environmental quality is found to be weak. In addition, many of the variables that others have found to be related to support for environmental quality are not found to be related to support for restrictive growth. The only reasons for support that emerge from this study are economic. J. Rose, Recent Decisions on Population Growth Control, J. Hughes (ed.), <i>New Dimensions in Urban Planning</i>, Center for Urban Policy Research, New Brunswick, 1974. H. Franklin, <i>Controlling Urban Growth: But for Whom?</i>, The Potomac Institute, Washington, 1973. O. Williams and C. Adrian, <i>Four Cities</i>, The University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia, 1963. L. Sagalyn and G. Sternlieb, <i>Zoning and Housing Costs: The Impact of Land Use Controls on Housing Price</i>, Center for Urban Policy Research, New Brunswick, 1974. N. Williams, Jr., and T. Norman, Exclusionary Land Use Controls: The Case of Northeast New Jersey, <i>Syracuse Law Review, 41</i>, pp. 475-507, 1971. J. Ellis, Environment and Growth: Increasing Interdependence, <i>National Civic Review, 65</i>, pp. 236-261, 1976. B. Mitchell, Behavioral Aspects of Water Management: A Paradigm and A Case Study, <i>Environment and Behavior, 3</i>, pp. 135-154, 1971. H. Erskine, The Polls: Pollution and Its Cost, <i>Public Opinion Quarterly, 36</i>, pp. 120-135, 1972. D. Munton and L. Brady, American Public Opinion and Environmental Pollution, <i>Behavioral Science Laboratory Research Report</i>, The Ohio State University, 1970. D. Dillman and J. Christenson, The Public Value for Pollution Control, W. Burch, Jr., et al., (eds.), <i>Social Behavior, Natural Resources and the Environment</i>, Harper and Row, New York, pp. 237-256, 1972. L. Tognacci, R. Weigel, M. Wideen and D. Vernon, Environmental Quality: How Universal is Public Concern?, <i>Environment and Behavior, 4</i>, pp. 73-86, 1972. E. Costantini and K. Hanf, Environmental Concern at Lake Tahoe; A Study of Elite Perceptions, Backgrounds, and Attitudes, <i>Environment and Behavior, 4</i>, pp. 209-242, 1972. R. Dunlap and R. Gale, Party Membership and Environmental Politics: A Legislative Roll-Call Analysis, <i>Social Science Quarterly, 55</i>, pp. 570-590, 1974. H. Sanoff and M. Sawhney, Residential Viability: A Study of User Attitudes Toward Their Residential Environment, <i>EDRA 3</i>, University of California Press, Los Angeles, 1972. F. Carp, F. Zawadski and H. Shokrkon Dimensions of Urban Environmental Quality, <i>Environment and Behavior, 8</i>, pp. 239-263, 1976. J. McEnvoy, III, The American Concern with Environment, W. Burch, et al. (eds.), <i>Social Behavior, Natural Resources, and the Environment</i>, Harper and Row, New York, pp. 214-236, 1972. R. Dunlap, The Impact of Political Orientations on Environmental Attitudes and Action, <i>Environment and Behavior, 7</i>, pp. 428-454, 1975. N. Nie, C. Hull, K. Steinbrenner and D. Brent, <i>Statistical Package for the Social Sciences</i>, McGraw Hill, New York, 1975. J. Aldrich and C. Cnudde, Probing the Bounds of Conventional Wisdom: A Comparison of Regression, Profit, and Discriminant Analysis, <i>American Journal of Political Science, 19</i>, pp. 571-608, 1975.