<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE Publisher PUBLIC "-//MetaPress//DTD MetaPress 2.0//EN" "http://public.metapress.com/dtd/MPRESS/MetaPressv2.dtd">
<Publisher>
	<PublisherInfo>
		<PublisherName>Baywood Publishing Company</PublisherName>
	</PublisherInfo>
	<Journal>
		<JournalInfo JournalType="Journals">
			<JournalPrintISSN>0047-2433</JournalPrintISSN>
			<JournalElectronicISSN>1541-3802</JournalElectronicISSN>
			<JournalTitle>Journal of Environmental Systems</JournalTitle>
			<JournalCode>BWES</JournalCode>
			<JournalID>300323</JournalID>
			<JournalURL>http://baywood.metapress.com/link.asp?target=journal&amp;id=300323</JournalURL>
		</JournalInfo>
		<Volume>
			<VolumeInfo>
				<VolumeNumber>12</VolumeNumber>
			</VolumeInfo>
			<Issue>
				<IssueInfo IssueType="Regular">
					<IssueNumberBegin>4</IssueNumberBegin>
					<IssueNumberEnd>4</IssueNumberEnd>
					<IssueSupplement>0</IssueSupplement>
					<IssuePartStart>0</IssuePartStart>
					<IssuePartEnd>0</IssuePartEnd>
					<IssueSequence>000012000419820101</IssueSequence>
					<IssuePublicationDate>
						<CoverDate Year="1982" Month="1" Day="1"/>
						<CoverDisplay>Number 4 / 1982-83</CoverDisplay>
					</IssuePublicationDate>
					<IssueID>P90G59A44NY8</IssueID>
					<IssueURL>http://baywood.metapress.com/link.asp?target=issue&amp;id=P90G59A44NY8</IssueURL>
				</IssueInfo>
				<Article ArticleType="Original">
					<ArticleInfo Free="No" ESM="No">
						<ArticleDOI>10.2190/QD1E-M01H-JDL1-NU37</ArticleDOI>
						<ArticlePII>QD1EM01HJDL1NU37</ArticlePII>
						<ArticleSequenceNumber>1</ArticleSequenceNumber>
						<ArticleTitle Language="En">Cost-Effectiveness Evaluation of Flue Gas Desulfurization Processes</ArticleTitle>
						<ArticleFirstPage>289</ArticleFirstPage>
						<ArticleLastPage>301</ArticleLastPage>
						<ArticleHistory>
							<RegistrationDate>20020509</RegistrationDate>
							<ReceivedDate>20020509</ReceivedDate>
							<Accepted>20020509</Accepted>
							<OnlineDate>20020509</OnlineDate>
						</ArticleHistory>
						<FullTextFileName>QD1EM01HJDL1NU37.pdf</FullTextFileName>
						<FullTextURL>http://baywood.metapress.com/link.asp?target=contribution&amp;id=QD1EM01HJDL1NU37</FullTextURL>
						<Composite>4</Composite>
					</ArticleInfo>
					<ArticleHeader>
						<AuthorGroup>
							<Author AffiliationID="A1">
								<GivenName>Ronnie</GivenName>
								<Initials>Leung-Nee</Initials>
								<FamilyName>Tong</FamilyName>
								<Degrees/>
								<Roles/>
							</Author>
							<Author AffiliationID="A2">
								<GivenName>John</GivenName>
								<Initials>D.</Initials>
								<FamilyName>Keenan</FamilyName>
								<Degrees/>
								<Roles/>
							</Author>
							<Affiliation AFFID="A1">
								<OrgDivision/>
								<OrgName>The Energy Center, University of Pennsylvania</OrgName>
								<OrgAddress/>
							</Affiliation>
							<Affiliation AFFID="A2">
								<OrgDivision/>
								<OrgName>Department of Civil and Urban Engineering, University of Pennsylvania</OrgName>
								<OrgAddress/>
							</Affiliation>
						</AuthorGroup>
						<Abstract Language="En">An economic dispatch model is developed to simulate the daily load dispatch operations of a power system. The model has been used to account for the operation of various flue gas desulfurization (FGD) systems and their impacts on the power system economic dispatch pattern and SO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; emissions. The cost minimizing dispatch patterns and system operating costs of a power system with and without FGD can be simulated, and the SO&lt;sub&gt;2&lt;/sub&gt; removal cost of various FGD systems calculated and compared. Simulations performed on a hypothetical test power system with nine coal-fired generating units showed that the lime and the Wellman-Lord processes are the two least costly FGD systems to operate. The limestone process is also competitive. The same three processes are also found to be the most cost-effective FGD systems. A sensitivity analysis showed that the most critical factor influencing the cost-effectiveness of a FGD system is the sulfur content of the fuel. A high sulfur fuel (coal, in this study) results in a large increase in cost-effectiveness, and a moderate increase in the system operating cost.</Abstract>
						<biblist>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="1">R. L. -N Tong and J. D. Keenan, Economic Dispatch for Flue Gas Desulfurization, &lt;i&gt;Proc. ASCE, Journal of Energy Engineering&lt;/i&gt;, forthcoming.</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="2">C. E. Janig and H. Shaw, A Comparative Assessment of Flue Gas Treatment; Part I - Status and Design, &lt;i&gt;JAPCA, 31&lt;/i&gt;:4, pp. 421-428, 1981.</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="3">USEPA, &lt;i&gt;Symposium on Flue Gas Desulfurization, Hollywood, Florida, November 1977&lt;/i&gt;, Vols. I and II, EPA-600/7-78-058a, EPA-600/7-78-058b, 1978.</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="4">USEPA, &lt;i&gt;Particulate and Sulfur Dioxide Emission Control Costs for Large Coal-Fired Boilers&lt;/i&gt;, Report by PEDCO Environmental, Inc., EPA-450/3-78-007, 168 pp., 1978.</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="5">G. G. McGlamery, T. W. Tarkington and S. V. Tomlison, &quot;Economic and Energy Requirements of Sulfur Dioxide Control Processes,&quot; draft report prepared by Tennessee Valley Authority Muscle Shoals, Alabama, for presentation at the Synposium of Flue Gas Desulfurization, Las Vegas, Nevada, March, 1977, 77 pp., 1979.</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="6">Power Technologies, Inc., &lt;i&gt;Synthetic Electric Utility Systems for Evaluating Advanced Technologies&lt;/i&gt;, final report to Electric Power Research Institute, EPRIEM-285, 139 pp., 1977.</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="7">M. E. El-Hawary and G. S. Christensen, &lt;i&gt;Optimal Economic Operation of Electric Power Systems&lt;/i&gt;, Academic Press, New York, 278 pp., 1979.</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="8">A. S. Vertis, &quot;Environmental Consideration in Power Dispatch,&quot; Ph.D. dissertation, Moore School of Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, 149 pp., 1973.</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="9">U. S. Department of Energy, &lt;i&gt;Monthly Energy Review&lt;/i&gt;, February 1981.</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="10">J. Endrenyi, &lt;i&gt;Reliability Modeling in Electric Power Systems&lt;/i&gt;, Wiley-Interscience, New York, 338 pp., 1979.</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="11">U. S. Department of Energy, &lt;i&gt;Study of Benefits of Improved Power Plant Reliability and Productivity&lt;/i&gt;, Phase I and II Reports, Economic Regulatory Administration, Division of Power Supply and Reliability, HCP/B60792 and 02, 241 and 215 pp., respectively, 1979.</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
						</biblist>
					</ArticleHeader>
				</Article>
			</Issue>
		</Volume>
	</Journal>
</Publisher>
