10.2190/69NT-3WMR-MPBX-XPN9 69NT3WMRMPBXXPN9 3 Economics of Downward Revision of Environmental Standards and Actions 127 135 20020509 20020509 20020509 20020509 69NT3WMRMPBXXPN9.pdf http://baywood.metapress.com/link.asp?target=contribution&id=69NT3WMRMPBXXPN9 2 Donald E. Agthe Economics University of Nevada, Reno This article examines the theoretical ramifications of a downward revision of environmental standards or actions. It points out that firms complying with earlier standards make capital commitments based on the higher standard. Since the earlier standard is the only signal the firm has in its planning process, the issue is raised, but not resolved, of whether the earlier standard represents an implicit contract between society and the firm. If so, this might imply compensation is needed for the firms unrecoverable capital expenditures. It is also pointed out that society may also bear some of the lost capital cost. Lastly, the article considers the advantage gained by firms that did comply with the earlier regulation.

J. H. Dales, Pollution, Property, and Prices, University of Toronto Press, Toronto, Canada, 1968.

Kissimmee River Survey Review, Coordinating Council on the Restoration of the Kissimmee River Valley and Taylor Creek-Nubbin Slough Basin, Tallahassee, Florida, August 1983.

D. E. Agthe and P. F. Roden, A Note on Factors Influencing Pollution Abatement Outlays and Financing, Business and Economic Perspectives, Spring 1979.

P. B. Pashigan, How Large and Small Plants Fare Under Environmental Regulation, Regulation, p. 19, September/October 1983.

N. Kaldor, Welfare Propositions in Economics, The Economic Journal, 49, p. 549, 1939.

J. R. Hicks, The Foundations of Welfare Economics, The Economic Journal, 48, p. 706, 1939.

W. J. Baumol, Welfare Economics and the Theory of the State, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1965.

R. S. Whitley and D. E. Agthe, John Rawls and Benefit — Cost Analysis, The Forum for Social Economics, p. 67, Fall/Winter 1983.