10.2190/7LQY-HT2X-VMF3-C3C2 7LQYHT2XVMF3C3C2 7 Graph Theory Applied to Evaluation of Water Sciences Research Systems 161 189 20020509 20020509 20020509 20020509 7LQYHT2XVMF3C3C2.pdf http://baywood.metapress.com/link.asp?target=contribution&id=7LQYHT2XVMF3C3C2 2 Denis Couillard Institut National de la Recherche, Scientifique (INRS-Eau), Sainte-Foy, Québec Many procedures have been proposed over the past years for evaluating the degree to which the objectives pursued by research are realized. However, none of these has succeeded in entirely encompassing the problem. Thus, a new approach that is likely to improve on already existing procedures has been sought. After presenting a typology of the diverse methods used in the evaluation process, this article describes a technique which permits one to systematically determine the relationships in a system of research execution and to rapidly identify the principal components. The use of coherence graphs has facilitated the achievement of these objectives. As a case study, the method has been applied to qualitatively describe a system of university research in the water sciences. In the preliminary step, the objectives pursued by university research and the disciplines necessary for realizing projects have been itemized. The second stage involves the construction of a coherence graph by establishing relationships between the elements. A schematic representation of the relationships making up the research system is thus obtained. The graph consists of five levels: objectives, sources of financing, places where research is conducted, programs, and project disciplines. This graphic representation allows one to identify among the multiple requests for funds those that have the greatest potential to provide the desired results in accordance with the objectives retained.

D. Mascolo, Introduction à une démarche évaluative de la recherche: application au système universitaire, Ministère de l'Éducation, Gouvernement du Québec, Québec, Canada, 1980.

C. O. Jones, An Introduction to the Study Policy, Duxbury Press, 2nd Edition, pp. 205-206, 1978.

A. Greycar, Political Issues in Research and Evaluation, Evaluation Quarterly, 3:3, pp. 460-471, 1979.

M. C. Alkin, Evaluation Theory Development, Evaluation Comment, 2:1, pp. 2-7, 1969.

P. Hesseling, Principles of Evaluation, Social Compass, 11:1, pp. 5-22, 1964.

D. Couillard and P. Trudel, Modèle de la gestion du territoire et des ressources et scénario d'évaluation des impacts, Eau du Québec, 11:1, pp. 9-13, 1978.

D. Couillard, Quality of Life: The Importance of Man-Environment Relations and a Tentative Conceptual Model, Journal of Environmental Systems, 12:2, pp. 163-184, 1982-83.

M. L. Warner and E. H. Preston, A Review of Environmental Impact Assessment Methodologies, Report No. 68-01-1871, Office of Research and Development, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D. C., 20460, 1974.

W. L. Smith, Quantifying the Environmental Impact of Transportation Systems, Van Doren-Hazard-Stallings-Schnacke, Topeka, Kansas, mimeographed, undated.

I. McHarg, A Comprehensive Highway Route-Selection Method, Highway Research Record, Number 246, pp. 1-15, 1968.

I. McHarg, Design with Nature, Garden City, Natural History Press, pp. 31-41, 1969.

A. D. Little, Transportation and Environment: Synthesis for Action: Impact of National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 on the Department of Transportation: Vol. 3: Options for Environmental Management, prepared for Office of the Secretary, Department of Transportation, 1971.

W. C. Atkins and D. Burke, Interim Report: Social, Economic, and Environmental Factors in Highway Decision Making, research conducted for the Texas Highway Department in cooperation with the U. S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, College Station, Texas, Texas Transportation Institute, Texas A & M University, 1971.

Institute of Ecology, University of Georgia, Optimum Pathway Matrix Analysis Approach to the Environmental Decision-Making Process: Test Case: Relative Impact of Proposed Highway Alternatives, University of Georgia, Institute of Ecology, Athens, Georgia, mimeographed, 1971.

L. B. Leopold, F. E. Clarke, B. B. Hanshaw, and J. R. Balsley, A Procedure for Evaluating Environmental Impact, U. S. Geological Survey Circular 645, Washington, D. C., 13 pages, 1971.

J. C. Sorensen, A Framework for Identification and Control of Resource Degradation and Conflict in the Multiple Use of the Coastal Zone, Thesis, Department of Landscope Architecture, University of California, 50 pages, 1971.

J. C. Sorensen and J. E. Pepper, Procedure for Regional Clearinghouse Review of Environmental Impact Statements Phase Two, report to the Association of Bay Area Government, 1973.

Central New York Regional Planning and Development Board, Environmental Resources Management, prepared for department of HUD, NTIS PB 217 517, 1972.

N. Dee, Environmental Evaluation System of Water Resources Planning, Report of the U. S. Bureau of Reclamation, Battelle Memorial Institute, Columbus, Ohio, 1972.

T. M. Krauskopf and D. C. Bunde, Evaluation of Environmental Impact Through a Computer Modelling Process, Environmental Impact Analysis: Philosophy and Methods, R. Ditton and T. Goodale (eds.), University of Wisconsin Sea Grant Program, Madison, Wisconsin, pp. 107-125, 1972.

Multiagency Task Force, Guidelines for Implementing Principles and Standards for Multi-Objective Planning of Water Resources, Review Draft, U. S. Bureau of Reclamation, Washington, D. C., December 1972.

L. V. Stover, Environmental Impact Assessment: A Procedure, Sanders and Thomas, Inc., Miami, Florida, 1972.

Tulsa District, U. S. Army Corps of Engineers, Matrix Analysis of Alternatives for Water Resource Development, draft technical paper, 1972.

N. Dee, Planning Methodology for Water Quality Management: Environmental Evaluation System, Columbus, Ohio, 1973.

J. L. Moore, A Methodology for Evaluating Manufacturing Environmental Impact Statements for Delaware's Coastal Zone, Report to the State of Delaware, Battelle Memorial Institute, Columbus, Ohio, 1973.

D. Couillard, Systems Analysis for Description of Environmental Pollution, Water Supply and Management, 5, pp. 183-194, 1981.

J. K. Stanley, A Cardinal Utility Approach for Project Evaluation, Socio. Econ. Plan. Sciences, 8, pp. 329-338, 1974.

J. P. Guilford, Psychometric Methods, McGraw-Hill, New York, 597 pages, 1954.

W. J. Baumol, The Newmann-Morgenstern Utility Index — An Ordinalist View, J. Polit. Econ., 59, pp. 61-66, 1951.

R. N. Shepard, Metric Structures in Ordinal Data, Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 3, pp. 298-315, 1966.

R. H. Irving and S. F. Love, Evaluation and Choice — An Engineering Approach, Engineering Digest, pp. 31-33, November-December 1975.

D. J. Etzold, Benefit-Cost Analysis: An Integral Part of Environmental Decisioning, Journal of Environmental Systems, 3, pp. 253-256, 1973.

L. Prati, R. Pavanello, and F. Pesarin, Assessment of Surface Water Quality by a Single Index of Pollution, Water Research, 5, pp. 741-751, 1971.

J. F. Morin and R. Trudel, Évaluation de l'impact économique de l'activité manufacturière du bassin de la rivière Saint-François, Report No. 0302-21(7), Direction de l'aménagement, Division de l'affectation, Ministère des Richesses naturelles, Gouvernement du Québec, Canada, 1976.

M. Provencher and M. P. LaMontagne, Méthode de détermination d'un indice d'appréciation de la qualité des eaux selon différentes utilisations, Service de qualité des eaux, Ministère des Richesses naturelles, Gouvernement du Québec, Canada, 1977.

N. I. McClelland, Water Quality Index Application in the Kansas River Basin, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Kansas City, Kansas, Report No. EPA-907/9-74-001, 227 pages, 1974.

Environmental Protection Agency, Quality Criteria for Water, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D. C., 256 pages, 1976.

Environmental Protection Agency, Water Quality Criteria, Environmental Studies Board, U. S. Government Printing Office, Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D. C., Report No. 5501-00520, 594 pages, 1972.

Communauté Économique Européenne, Direction du Conseil concernant la qualité requise des eaux superficielles destinées à la production d'eau alimentaire dans les états membres, Journal officiel des Communautés européennes, L-194, pp. 26-31, 1975.

Communauté Économique Européenne, Avis sur une proposition du Conseil concernant la qualité requise des eaux douces aptes à la vie des poissons, Journal officiel des Communautés européennes, C-77, pp. 2-5, 1977.

Ministère de l'Éducation du Québec, La recherche subventionnée et commanditée dans les universités du Québec, 1972-73 et 1973-74, Direction générale de l'enseignement supérieure, Ministère de l'Éducation, Gouvernement du Québec, Québec, Canada, 1976.

D. Healy, L. Dion, and B. Neatby, Rapport de la commission d'enquěte sur les études supérieures dans les sciences humaines, Conseil de recherches en sciences humaines du Canada, Gouvernement du Canada, Canada, 1978.

D. Maquart, Introduction à l'organisation de la décision, Annales agronomiques INRA, Versailles, France, 1971.

D. Couillard, D. Bourret, and G. Thibault, Graphe de cohérence appliqué aux impacts économique et écologiques de l'implantation d'une usine de pâtes et papiers à Saint-Félicien, Lac Saint-Jean, Québec, presented to the 14th Canadian Symposium on Water Pollution Research, University of Ottawa, INRS-Eau, University of Quebec, Quebec, Canada, Internal Report No. 75, 1978.

D. Couillard, Évaluation des impacts environmentaux dus aux rejets d'une usine de pâte kraft sur le Salmo salar ouananiche à l'aide d'une nouvelle méthode: le graphe de cohérence, Environmental Pollution, Series B, 2, pp. 145-161, 1981.

D. Couillard, Évaluation de la pollution et des répercussions des rejets des industries des pâtes et papiers sur la vie aquatique, The Sciences of the Total Environment, 14, pp. 167-184, 1980.