10.2190/9HE8-EX6E-YY4V-AE2D 9HE8EX6EYY4VAE2D 2 Economic Efficiency of SOx Standards 333 346 20020509 20020509 20020509 20020509 9HE8EX6EYY4VAE2D.pdf http://baywood.metapress.com/link.asp?target=contribution&id=9HE8EX6EYY4VAE2D 4 Kevin Rodman John D. Keenan Morgan Stanley, New York Department of Civil Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia The economic efficiency of the SOx New Source Performance Standards (NSPS) is examined by comparing the costs to comply by flue gas desulfurization with a combination of low sulfur coal, physical coal cleaning, and smaller FGD systems. The analysis is performed on a site specific basis. In some instances, the NSPS were found to be inefficient. In such cases the NSPS increased costs between 1 and 8 percent. A number of implications for policy design are discussed.

C. Komanoff, Power Plant Cost Excalation: Nuclear and Coal Capital Costs, Regulations and Economics, Komanoff Energy Associates, New York, 1981.

T. A. Burnett, Project Leader, Economic Evaluation Section, Pilot-Plant Design and Construction Branch; Energy Design and Operations; Energy Demonstrations and Technology; EPA/TVA, Computerized Shawnee Lime/Limestone Scrubbing Model Users Manual, Interagency Energy/Environment R+D Program Report, EPA-600/8-81-008 or TVA/OP/EDT-81/15, March 1981.

M. Zimmerman, The U. S. Coal Industry: The Economics of Policy Choice, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1981.

K. Rodman and J. D. Keenan, Modeling SO2 Abatement Costs, Journal of Environmental Systems, 14:3, pp. 211-239, 1985.

ICF, Inc., Effects of Alternative New Source Performance Standards for Coal-Fired Electric Utility Boilers on the Coal Markets and Utility Capacity Expansion Plans, Washington, D. C., September 1978.

ICF, Inc., Draft Report: Analyses of Alternative NSPS Regulations, Washington, D. C., October 1981.

B. Onursal, B. Hylton, B. Cheng, and M. McLandless, Cost Energy and Environmental Sensitivity Analysis of Coal Cleaning Technology for Industrial Boiler Applications, prepared for EPA Energy Assessment and Controls Division, EPA Contract #68-02-31-36, Washington, D. C., June 1980.

J. A. Cavallaro, M. T. Johnston, and A. W. Duerbrouck, Sulfur Reduction Potential of the Coals of the United States, U. S. DOI/BOM, Coal Preparation and Analysis Group-RI, 8118, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 1976.

Current Contract Prices and Spot Marker Steam Coal Prices, in Coal Week, 8:20, (unauthored), McGraw Hill Publications, New York, p. 5, May 17, 1982.

M. K. Buder, D. J. Folz, P. O. Goodman, L. Sybert, and H. Huettenhain, Impact of Coal Cleaning on the Cost of New Coal-Fired Power Generation, prepared by Bechtel Corporation, San Francisco, for EPRI, Palo Alto, California, EPRI-CS-1622, Project 1180-2, March 1981.

G. A. Isaacs, R. A. Ressl, and D. W. Spaite, Cost Benefits Associated with the Use of Physically Cleaned Coal, PEDCo Environmental, Inc., Dallas, Texas, prepared for EPA, Contract #68-02-2603, May 1980.

Chemical Engineering, Chemical Engineering Plant Cost Index, 89:11, p. 7, McGraw-Hill Publications, New York, May 31, 1982.

A. M. Freeman III, The Benefits of Environmental Improvement: Theory and Practice, The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland, published for Resources for the Future, Washington, D. C., May 1981.

B. A. Ackerman, The Uncertain Search for Environmental Quality, The Free Press, New York, 1974.

W. Baumol and W. E. Oates, Economics, Environmental Policy, and the Quality of Life, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1979.

B. A. Ackerman and W. T. Hassler, Clean Coal/Dirty Air, Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut, 1981.