10.2190/XV00-DD4B-EPEH-EN5R XV00DD4BEPEHEN5R 2 The Comparative Effectiveness of Reward and Commitment Approaches in Motivating Community Recycling 93 113 20020509 20020509 20020509 20020509 XV00DD4BEPEHEN5R.pdf http://baywood.metapress.com/link.asp?target=contribution&id=XV00DD4BEPEHEN5R 2 Richard D. Katzev Anton U. Pardini Reed College, Portland, Oregon The relative effectiveness of commitment and incentive techniques in promoting newspaper recycling was compared. Some homeowners were asked to make a formal, signed commitment to recycle newspapers. Others received tokens exchangeable for back-up reinforcers of goods and services each time they recycled. A combined commitment plus token reinforcer group, and an untreated control group were also included. Following five treatment weeks, all the contingencies were removed during three follow-up weeks. While the Commitment condition was more effective on some recycling measures and the combined Commitment + Token condition was on others, neither group was consistently superior to the other. However, recycling was uniformly greater in both commitment groups than it was in the Token group throughout both phases of the experiment. These findings indicate that commitment techniques have considerable impact in motivating individuals to recycle and that they may be able to overcome some of the limitations often encountered by incentive-based programs in promoting resource conservation.

E. S. Geller, R. Winett, and P. Everett, Preserving the Environment: New Strategies for Behavior Change, Pergamon, New York, 1982.

M. Lepper, Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation in Children: Detrimental Effects of Superfluous Social Controls, in Aspects of the Development of Competence: The Minnesota Symposium on Child Psychology, 14, W. Collins (ed.), pp. 155-160, 1981.

E. S. Geller, Saving Environmental Resources through Waste Reduction and Recycling: How the Behavioral Community Psychologist Can Help, in Helping in the Community: Behavioral Applications, G. L. Martin and J. G. Osborne, (eds.), Plenum Press, New York, 1980.

Oregon Department of Environmental Quality, Solid Waste Division, Recycling Fact Sheet, Recycling Information Office, Salem, Oregon, 1974.

A. H. Purcell, The World's Trashiest People: Will they Clean Up Their Act or Throw Away Their Future?, The Futurist, 2, pp. 51-59, 1981.

H. Jacobs and J. Bailey, Evaluating Participation in a Residential Recycling Program, Journal of Environmental Systems, 5, pp. 39-57, 1982-83.

S. Burn and S. Oskamp, Increasing Recycling with Persuasive Communications and Public Commitment, Unpublished Manuscript, 1984.

W. P. Margulies, Steel and Paper Industries Look at Recycling as an Answer to Pollution, Advertising Age, 41, p. 63, 1975.

E. S. Geller, J. Chaffee, and R. Ingram, Promoting Paper-Recycling on a University Campus, Journal of Environmental Systems, 5, pp. 39-57, 1975.

J. Witmer and E. S. Geller, Facilitating Paper Recycling: Effects of Prompts, Raffles, and Contests, Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 9, pp. 315-322, 1976.

P. Luyben and S. Cummings, Motivating Beverage Container Recycling on a College Campus, Journal of Environmental Systems, 11, pp. 235-245, 1981-82.

E. Aronson, The Psychology of Insufficient Justification: An Analysis of Some Conflicting Data, in Cognitive Consistency, S. Feldman (ed.), Academic Press, New York, 1966.

M. Lepper, D. Green, and R. Nisbett, Undermining Children's Intrinsic Interest with Extrinsic Rewards: A Test of the Overjustification Hypothesis, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28, pp. 129-137, 1973.

R. Cialdini, Influence: Science and Practice, Scott Foresman and Company, Glenview, Illinois, 1985.

E. Aronson and J. Carlsmith, Effect of the Severity of Threat on the Devaluation of Forbidden Behavior, Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66, pp. 584-588, 1963.

T. Wilson and G. Lassiter, Increasing Intrinsic Interest with Superfluous Extrinsic Controls, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, pp. 811-819, 1982.

D. Bem, Self-Perception: An Alternative Interpretation of Cognitive Dissonance Phenomena, Psychological Review, 74, pp. 183-200, 1967.

A. Pardini and R. Katzev, The Effect of Commitment on Newspaper Recycling, Journal of Environmental Systems, 13, pp. 245-254, 1983-84.

J. Arbuthnot, R. Tedeschi, M. Wayner, J. Turner, S. Kressel, and R. Rush, The Induction of Sustained Recycling Behavior Through the Foot-in-the-Door Technique, Journal of Environmental Systems, 6, pp. 353-366, 1976-77.

R. Katzev, The Impact of Commitment in Promoting Consumer Energy Conservation, Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Consumer Behavior and Energy Policy, Paris, France, 1985. 32.

M. Zuckerman, M. Lazzaro, and D. Waldgeir, Undermining Effects of the Foot-in-the-Door Technique with Extrinsic Rewards, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 9, pp. 292-296, 1979.

T. Heberlein and G. Warriner, The Influence of Price and Attitude on Shifting Residential Electricity Consumption from On-To Off-Peak Periods, Journal of Economic Psychology, 4, pp. 107-130, 1983.

G. Shippee and W. Gregory, Public Commitment and Energy Conservation, American Journal of Community Psychology, 10, pp. 81-93, 1982.

C. Kiesler, The Psychology of Commitment: Experiments Linking Behavior to Belief, Academic Press, New York, New York, 1971.

R. Brownstein and R. Katzev, The Comparative Effects of Three Compliance Techniques on Donating to a Charitable Organization, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 15, pp. 564-574, 1985.

T. Moriarity, Crime, Commitment and the Responsive Bystander: Two Field Experiments, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, pp. 370-376, 1975.

R. Katzev and T. Johnson, Comparing the Effects of Monetary Incentives and Foot-in-the-Door Strategies in Promoting Residential Electricity Conservation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 14, pp. 12-27, 1984.

M. Pallak, D. Cook and J. Sullivan, Commitment and Energy Conservation, in Applied Social Psychology Annual, 1, L. Bickman (ed.), pp. 235-253, 1980.

C. Scott, Modifying Socially Conscious Behavior; The Foot-in-the-Door Technique, Journal of Consumer Research, 41, pp. 156-164, 1977.

W. Backman and R. Katzev, The Effects of Non-Contingent Free Bus Tickets and Personal Commitment on Urban Bus Ridership, Transportation Research, 16A, pp. 103-108, 1982.

P. Stern and E. Aronson, (eds.), Energy Use: The Human Dimension, W. H. Freeman, New York, New York, 1984.

L. Becker, The Joint Effect of Feedback and Goal Setting on Performance: A Field Study of Residential Energy Consumption, Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, pp. 428-433, 1978.

R. Winett and M. Nietzel, Behavioral Ecology: Contingency Management of Consumer Energy Use, American Journal of Community Psychology, 3, pp. 123-133, 1975.

R. Winett, J. Kagel, R. Battalio, and R. Winkler, Effects of Monetary Rebates, Feedback and Information on Residential Electricity Conservation, Journal of Applied Psychology, 63, pp. 73-80, 1978.

P. Hake and R. Foxx, Promoting Gasoline Conservation: The Effects of Reinforcement Schedules, a Leader and Self-Recording, Behavior Modification, 2, pp. 339-369, 1978.