10.2190/9K1K-8WQ6-8LP9-EU7R 9K1K8WQ68LP9EU7R 4 Municipal Solid Waste Incinerator Impacts on Residential Property Values and Sales in Host Communities 229 256 20020509 20020509 20020509 20020509 9K1K8WQ68LP9EU7R.pdf http://baywood.metapress.com/link.asp?target=contribution&id=9K1K8WQ68LP9EU7R 3 Chris Zeiss University of Alberta, Edmonton Property value effects of new municipal waste incinerators often concern residents in prospective host communities. Despite numerous studies of property values using standard approaches, the results show insignificant or inconsistent results. This article describes in detail the mechanism that determines property value differences in response to waste facility impacts and tests the key issues in the process. Key items and assumptions that underlie the linear "hedonic property value" model include: 1) the facility's impacts, 2) residents' and potential buyers' perception and understanding of the impacts, and 3) assumptions that property value data is well behaved and that other factors in the real estate market are constant. The analysis of property values at waste facilities shows that many studies reveal insignificant or marginal effects. Few show significantly negative impacts and some show positive property value impacts. A detailed case study of property values and sales at a new incinerator site shows no significant effects of facility impacts on sales prices or on the number of sales in the host community. Tests of key assumptions show that some are poorly met by the data. Property value guarantees are offered as a method of encouraging residents to accept the facility, but the guarantees do not sway the most concerned respondents. In conclusion, the implications for facility siting are discouraging because the results do not corroborate the standard approach to predicting property value impacts. Therefore, analysts are left without a method to predict impacts or to determine effective methods of addressing residents' concerns. The results mean that future research must carefully trace residents' perceptions of impacts at the time of purchase, test the model's assumptions, and adapt the model accordingly. J. Knetsch, <i>Property Rights and Compensation</i>, Butterworths, Toronto and Vancouver, 1983. C. Zeiss and J. Atwater, Waste Facilities in Residential Communities: Impacts and Acceptance, <i>Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 113</i>:1, pp. 19-34, 1987. A. Freeman, <i>The Benefits of Environmental Improvement</i>, The Johns Hopkins University Press, Philadelphia, 1979. E. Mishan, <i>Cost-Benefit Analysis</i>, (3rd Edition), George Allen and Unwin, London, England, 1982. C. Zeiss and J. Atwater, Waste Disposal Facilities and Community Response: Tracing Pathways from Facility Impacts to Community Attitude, <i>Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 18</i>, pp. 83-96, 1991. P. W. Abelson, The Policy Problems and Economics of Aircraft Noise, <i>Transportation Research, Part B</i>:11, pp. 357-364, 1977. C. Zeiss and J. Atwater, Waste Facility Impacts on Residential Property Values, <i>Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 115</i>:2, pp. 64-80, 1989. C. Zeiss, "Siting Waste Disposal Facilities: Impacts and Acceptance," Ph.D. thesis, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, 1988. <i>25 Negotiated Landfill Siting Agreements</i>, Wisconsin Facility Siting Board, Madison, Wisconsin, 1987. Good Neighbor Program, City of Seattle, Seattle, 1986. O. Hockman, E. Hwang, and G. Rudzitis, <i>The Environmental Costs of Landfills and Incinerators</i>, University of Chicago and the Argonne National Laboratory, Chicago, 1976. J. Price, The Impact of Solid Waste Management Facilities on Surrounding Real Estate Values, <i>Proceedings of the 25th Annual International GRCDA, Seminar, Equipment, Services and Systems Show</i>, St. Paul, Minnesota, 1987. R. Schmalensee, R. Ramanathan, W. Ramm, and D. Smallwood, Measuring External Effects of Solid Waste Management, <i>Report R 801673</i>, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, 1975. D. Groth, Wildwood Sanitary Landfill Feasibility Study, CH2M Hill Northwest, Inc., Portland, 1981. B. P. Baker, "Land Values and Disamenities: The Case of Hazardous Waste Disposal Facilities and Landfills," M.Sc. thesis, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, 1982. C. Zeiss, "The Financial and Social Costs of Waste Disposal," M.Sc. thesis, University of British Columbia, at Vancouver, B. C., 1984. H. Gamble and R. Downing, Effects of Sanitary Landfills on Property Values and Residential Developments on Solid and Liquid Wastes, <i>The Management, Methods and Socioeconomic Considerations</i>, S. Majunder and E. Wilfer (eds.), National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC, 1984. C. Pettit and C. Johnson, The Impact on Property Values of Solid Waste Facilities, <i>Waste Age</i>, pp. 97-104, April 1987. <i>1980 Census of Population and Housing</i>, Salem SMSA-Census Tract #25, U. S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC, 1983. Garbage Site Pushed at Brooks, <i>Salem Statesman-Journal, 1A</i>, March 9, 1983. <i>Salem-Multiple Listings Bureau, Ltd.</i>, Quarterly Books, Salem MLS-Bureau, Ltd., Salem, Oregon, 1982 through 1988. C. Zeiss, Incinerator Impacts on Residential Property Sales: Beyond Price Effects, <i>Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 116</i>:2, pp. 80-97, ASCE, 1990. C. Zeiss and J. Atwater, Property Value Guarantees for Waste Facilities, <i>Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 115</i>:3, pp. 123-134, ASCE, 1989. P. Graves, J. Murdoch, M. Thayer, and D. Waldman, The Rubustness of Hedonic Price Estimation: Urban Air Quality, in <i>Land Economics, 64</i>:3, pp. 220-233, August 1988.