10.2190/80EP-Q2C8-T6AM-D2XN 80EPQ2C8T6AMD2XN 3 Comparative Analyses of Local Wellhead Protection Programs 255 285 20020509 20020509 20020509 20020509 80EPQ2C8T6AMD2XN.pdf http://baywood.metapress.com/link.asp?target=contribution&id=80EPQ2C8T6AMD2XN 3 J. E. Connick Larry W. Canter University of Oklahoma, Norman An analysis of the implementation of local wellhead protection programs (LWHPPs) focused on preventing contamination of public ground water supplies is presented herein. From over 300 such programs in varying stages of development in the United States, the analysis presented is based on twenty-nine LWHPPs found in twenty-five different states. Delineation of wellhead protection areas (WHPAs) involved the use of using one or more of up to six methods as specified by the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency; the most frequently used method was hydrogeologic mapping. Approximately 150 potential types of sources of contamination were inventoried; however, prioritization of these sources was accomplished in only ten of the twenty-nine case study communities. Prioritization was typically based on rating source types or characteristics and local hydrogeological factors. A total of thirty-one different wellhead protection measures were identified, with all twenty-nine communities using a mixture of such approaches. New source evaluations were considered in eighteen case studies, with the most popular method for control being via the adoption of land use-related ordinances. the following observations and lessons can be drawn from this comparative analysis study: 1) the twenty-nine LWHPPs were unique and reflected local needs, hydrogeological conditions, and land uses; 2) several methods are available for delineating WHPAs and identifying potential sources of ground water contamination within the defined areas; 3) methods are needed for facilitating consistent source/contaminant prioritization for different levels of available information; 4) research is needed on the implementation and effectiveness of pollution prevention measures, particularly as related to specific source types; and 5) systematic approaches are also needed for evaluating potential land use changes which may occur within defined WHPAs, or for evaluating proposed wells co-located within existing WHPAs.

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Guidelines for Delineation of Wellhead Protection Areas, Office of Ground Water Protection, Washington, D. C., June 1987.

J. E. Connick, Comparative Analyses of Local Wellhead Protection Programs, MES thesis, University of Oklahoma, Norman, Oklahoma, 1994.

M. Jaffe and F. DiNovo, Local Groundwater Protection, American Planning Association, Washington, D. C., 1987.

Joint Planning Commission, Lehigh-Northampton Counties and R. K. R. Associates, Wellhead Protection Demonstration Project, Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania, December 1992.

Eisenberg, Olivieri, and Associates, Inc., and Santa Clara Valley Water District, Final Report—Pilot Wellhead Protection Program and Geographic Information System Study for the Santa Clara Valley Water District, Campbell, California, May 1991.

Colorado Department of Health, Wellhead Protection Program for the Town of Eads, Kiowa County, Colorado, Denver, Colorado, undated.

Central Connecticut Regional Planning Agency, Final Report—Wellhead Demonstration Program, Aquifer Protection for the Central Connecticut Planning Region, Bristol, Connecticut, undated.

Illinois Environmental Protection Agency, Groundwater Section, Illinois Groundwater Protection Program: Pilot Groundwater Protection Needs Assessment for Pekin Public Water Supply, Report 1795040, Springfield, Illinois, November 1992.

BCI Geonetics, Inc., Wellhead and Aquifer Protection Plan for Norway, Oxford, and Paris Water Districts—Phase I Report, Winslow, Maine, March 1989.

Office of Environmental Protection, Department of Water, City of Dayton, Well Field Protection Program Report, Dayton, Ohio, September 1991.

Envirotech Services, Inc., Wellhead Protection Demonstration Project, the City of Enid, Oklahoma, S-006733-01-2, Enid, Oklahoma, undated.

T. Davis, Portland's Groundwater Protection Program, presented at the National Conference on Aquifer and Wellhead Protection, Coeur d'Alene, Idaho, March 28-April 1, 1993.

Thurston County Health Department, Northern Thurston County Ground Water Management Plan, Olympia, Washington, September 1992.

U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Managing Ground Water Contamination Sources in Wellhead Protection Areas: A Priority Setting Approach, EPA 570/9-91-023, Office of Water, Washington, D. C., October 1991.

Horsely, Witten, and Hegemann, Inc., Water Supply Protection Program for Dutchess County, New York, Dutchess County Water and Wastewater Authority, Barnstable, Massachusetts, October 1992.