10.2190/8KP6-H4CV-5BB7-LP8U 8KP6H4CV5BB7LP8U 1 Comparison of Systems and Single-Medium Approaches in Environmental Risk-Based Decision Making: A Case Study of a Sludge Management Problem 215 247 20020509 20020509 20020509 20020509 8KP6H4CV5BB7LP8U.pdf http://baywood.metapress.com/link.asp?target=contribution&id=8KP6H4CV5BB7LP8U 3 Hwong-Wen Ma Douglas J. Crawford-Brown University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill The traditional single-medium approach to environmental management mitigates problems in one environmental medium at a time without considering interactions between different media. the management strategies selected from the single-medium approach may, therefore, simply shift problems between media. Alternatively, a systems approach advocates focusing on the environmental system as a source of risk, and selecting risk management strategies based on minimization of the composite risk from all pathways. However, entrenched interests and organizational structures associated with the current regulatory system, and the computational complexity of a systems approach, present obstacles for the adoption of a systems approach. These difficulties raise the question as to whether, or under what conditions, a systems approach is needed for improving decisions significantly. This study combines multimedia risk analysis and an optimization framework to develop a methodology for comparing the merits of the two approaches. We then apply the methodology to a sludge management decision problem and demonstrate that there are many cases in which the systems approach leads to the selection of optimal management strategies that differ from those using a single-medium approach.

NRC (National Research Council), Multimedia Approaches to Pollution Control: A Symposium Proceedings, Washington, D. C., 1987.

V. R. Rao, Risk Management: Time for Innovative Approaches, Environmental Management, 19:3, pp. 313-320, 1995.

H. G. Daellenbach, Systems and Decision Making, John Wiley & Sons Ltd., England, 1994.

H. J. Miser and E. S. Quade, Handbook for Systems Analysis: Overview of Uses, Procedures, Applications, and Practice, Elsevier Science Publishing Co., Inc., New York, 1985.

J. P. van Gigch, System Design, Modeling and Metamodeling, Plenum Press, New York, 1991.

L. Guruswamy, Integrated Pollution Control: The Way Forward, Arizona Journal of International and Comparative Law, 7:2, pp. 173-224, 1990.

B. G. Rabe, Integrating Environmental Regulation: Permitting Innovation at the State Level, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 14:3, p. 467, 1995.

O. Funke, Struggling with Integrated Environmental Policy: The EPA Experience, Policy Studies Review, 12:3/4, pp. 137-161, 1993.

M. D. Barrette, Design and Implementation of Multimedia and Sector Strategies at EPA, Journal of Environmental Regulation, 5:1, pp. 1-15, 1995.

V. T. Covello and M. W. Merkhofer, Risk Assessment Methods: Approaches for Assessing Health and Environmental Risks, Plenum Press, New York, 1993.

C. Lue-Hing et al. (eds.), Municipal Sewage Sludge Management, Technomic Publishing Co., Inc., Lancaster, 1992.

U. S. EPA, Regulatory Impact Analysis of the Proposed Regulations for Sewage Sludge Use and Disposal, Washington, D. C., 1989.

J. B. Stevens and D. L. Swackhamer, Environmental Pollution: A Multimedia Approach to Modeling Human Exposure, Environmental Science & Technology, 23:10, pp. 1180-1196, 1989.

Y. Cohen et al., Dynamic Partitioning of Organic Chemicals in Regional Environments: A Multimedia Screening-Level Modeling Approach, Environmental Science & Technology, 24:10, 1990.

D. Mackay et al., General Models for Evaluating the Regional Fate of Chemicals, Chemophere, 24:6, pp. 695-717, 1992.

T. E. McKone, Human Exposure to Chemicals from Multiple Media and through Multiple Pathways: Research Overview and Comments, Risk Analysis, 11:1, pp. 5-10, 1991.

G. Whelan et al., Overview of the Multimedia Environmental Pollutant Assessment System (MEPAS), Hazardous Waste & Hazardous Materials, 9:2, pp. 191-208, 1992.

U. S. EPA, Guidance for Performing Screening Level Risk Analyses at Combustion Facilities Burning Hazardous Wastes, Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, Washington, D. C., 1994.

G. Whelan et al., The Multimedia Environmental Pollutant Assessment System (MEPAS): Groundwater Pathway Formulations, prepared for U. S.DOE at Battelle, 1996.

D. L. Strenge and P. J. Chamberlain, The Multimedia Environmental Pollutant Assessment System (MEPAS): Exposure Pathway and Human Health Impact Assessment Models, prepared for U. S.DOE at Battelle, 1995.

U. S. EPA, U. S. EPA's Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS), Office of Research and Development, Cincinnati, 1992.

J. M. Callaway, Estimation of Food Consumption: Hanford Environmental Dose Reconstruction Project, Battelle, Richland, Washington, 1990.

J. Finley et al., Recommended Distributions for Exposure Factors Frequently Used in Health Risk Assessment, Risk Analysis, 14:4, pp. 533-553, 1994.

F. O. Hoffman and J. S. Hammonds, Propagation of Uncertainty in Risk Assessment: The Need to Distinguish between Uncertainty Due to Lack of Knowledge and Uncertainty Due to Variability, Risk Analysis, 14:5, pp. 707-712, 1994.