<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE Publisher PUBLIC "-//MetaPress//DTD MetaPress 2.0//EN" "http://public.metapress.com/dtd/MPRESS/MetaPressv2.dtd">
<Publisher>
	<PublisherInfo>
		<PublisherName>Baywood Publishing Company</PublisherName>
	</PublisherInfo>
	<Journal>
		<JournalInfo JournalType="Journals">
			<JournalPrintISSN>0047-2433</JournalPrintISSN>
			<JournalElectronicISSN>1541-3802</JournalElectronicISSN>
			<JournalTitle>Journal of Environmental Systems</JournalTitle>
			<JournalCode>BWES</JournalCode>
			<JournalID>300323</JournalID>
			<JournalURL>http://baywood.metapress.com/link.asp?target=journal&amp;id=300323</JournalURL>
		</JournalInfo>
		<Volume>
			<VolumeInfo>
				<VolumeNumber>30</VolumeNumber>
			</VolumeInfo>
			<Issue>
				<IssueInfo IssueType="Regular">
					<IssueNumberBegin>4</IssueNumberBegin>
					<IssueNumberEnd>4</IssueNumberEnd>
					<IssueSupplement>0</IssueSupplement>
					<IssuePartStart>0</IssuePartStart>
					<IssuePartEnd>0</IssuePartEnd>
					<IssueSequence>000030000420040601</IssueSequence>
					<IssuePublicationDate>
						<CoverDate Year="2004" Month="6" Day="1"/>
						<CoverDisplay>Number 4 / 2003-2004</CoverDisplay>
					</IssuePublicationDate>
					<IssueID>427NCRYH7KJ9</IssueID>
					<IssueURL>http://baywood.metapress.com/link.asp?target=issue&amp;id=427NCRYH7KJ9</IssueURL>
				</IssueInfo>
				<Article ArticleType="Original">
					<ArticleInfo Free="No" ESM="No">
						<ArticleDOI>10.2190/8130-17X0-88G8-2041</ArticleDOI>
						<ArticlePII>813017X088G82041</ArticlePII>
						<ArticleSequenceNumber>1</ArticleSequenceNumber>
						<ArticleTitle Language="En">Regulating Nutrient Discharge from Poultry Litter into Surface Waters: Total Maximum Daily Load Rules and Economic Incentives</ArticleTitle>
						<ArticleFirstPage>273</ArticleFirstPage>
						<ArticleLastPage>287</ArticleLastPage>
						<ArticleHistory>
							<RegistrationDate>20070221</RegistrationDate>
							<ReceivedDate>20070221</ReceivedDate>
							<Accepted>20070221</Accepted>
							<OnlineDate>20070221</OnlineDate>
						</ArticleHistory>
						<FullTextFileName>813017X088G82041.pdf</FullTextFileName>
						<FullTextURL>http://baywood.metapress.com/link.asp?target=contribution&amp;id=813017X088G82041</FullTextURL>
						<Composite>4</Composite>
					</ArticleInfo>
					<ArticleHeader>
						<AuthorGroup>
							<Author AffiliationID="A1">
								<GivenName>Keith</GivenName>
								<Initials/>
								<FamilyName>Willett</FamilyName>
								<Degrees/>
								<Roles/>
							</Author>
							<Author AffiliationID="A2">
								<GivenName>David</GivenName>
								<Initials>M.</Initials>
								<FamilyName>Mitchell</FamilyName>
								<Degrees/>
								<Roles/>
							</Author>
							<Affiliation AFFID="A1">
								<OrgDivision/>
								<OrgName>Oklahoma State University, Stillwater</OrgName>
								<OrgAddress/>
							</Affiliation>
							<Affiliation AFFID="A2">
								<OrgDivision/>
								<OrgName>Missouri State University, Springfield</OrgName>
								<OrgAddress/>
							</Affiliation>
						</AuthorGroup>
						<Abstract Language="En">The first 25 years of the Water Quality Act was characterized by major emphasis on regulating point sources with technology-based standards, but today many water quality problems still remain. The recent renewal of emphasis on water quality has been articulated in the form of proposed total maximum daily load (TMDL) rules. A TMDL identifies the amount of a pollutant that is allowed in a water body, allocates allowable pollutant loadings among sources, and provides a foundation for achieving water quality levels. The most important characteristic of TMDL rules is the impact on nonpoint source pollution. Poultry production has become an important component of the economic base in many watersheds, and the growing concern with the need to dispose of poultry litter that is loaded with nutrients has intensified the discussions surrounding the development of TMDL rules. Once a TMDL rule for nutrients such as phosphorus has been promulgated, it can be implemented by using an &quot;optimal tax,&quot; which is levied on poultry litter that is applied to crops and pastures. But to do so is viewed as problematic. This can be done using a &quot;standards and charges&quot; approach, which involves two steps. First, standards or targets for phosphorus in the watershed are set on the basis of the TMDL rule. Second, a set of taxes (charges) is designed and put into place to achieve the stated target for phosphorus. This article explores the application of a standards and charges policy framework for a TMDL rule regulating phosphorus from poultry litter in surface water under stochastic conditions using simulation and mathematical programming techniques. That is, a protocol is established that uses simulation and mathematical programming techniques to compute the tax for a standards and charges framework for implementing a TMDL rule for phosphorus from poultry litter in a stochastic environment. This protocol allows the tax rate to be determined on the basis of information on crop demands for nutrients as well as the amount of nutrients contained in the poultry litter. The tax rate determined from this protocol also reflects the stochastic nature of the fate and transport of the nutrients as well as an appropriately defined margin of safety. As shown, the Kuhn-Tucker conditions are used as the basis to develop the appropriate taxes.</Abstract>
						<biblist>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="1">R. Govindasamy, M. J. Cochran, and E. Buchberger, Economic Implications of Phosphorus Loadings for Pasture Land Applications of Poultry Litter, &lt;i&gt;Water Resources Bulletin&lt;/i&gt;, 30, pp. 901-910, 1994.</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="2">K. P. Paudel, M. Adhikari, A. Limaye, and N. R. Martin, Jr., Phosphorus-Based Management of Broiler Litter as Agricultural Fertilizer, &lt;i&gt;Journal of Environmental Systems&lt;/i&gt;, 29, pp. 311-339, 2003.</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="3">A. N. Sharpley, S. C. Chapra, R. Wedepohl, J. T. Sims, T. C. Daniel, and K. R. Reddy, Managing Agricultural Phosphorus for Protection of Surface Waters: Issues and Options, &lt;i&gt;Journal of Environmental Quality&lt;/i&gt;, 23, pp. 437-451, 1994.</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="4">J. Boyd, The New Face of the Clean Water Act: A Critical Review of the EPA's Proposed TMDL Rules, Resources for the Future, Inc., Washington, D.C., Discussion Paper No. 00-12, 2000.</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="5">V. Novotny, Integrating Diffuse/Nonpoint Pollution Control and Water Body Restoration into Watershed Management, &lt;i&gt;Journal of the American Water Resources Association&lt;/i&gt;, 35, pp. 717-727, 1999.</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="6">W. J. Baumol.E. and W. E. Oates. &lt;i&gt;The Theory of Environmental Policy, Cambridge&lt;/i&gt; University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom, 1988.</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="7">C. R. Knoeber and W. N. Thurman, Don't Count Your Chickens… Risk and Risk Sharing in the Broiler Industry, &lt;i&gt;American Journal of Agricultural Economics&lt;/i&gt;, 77, pp. 486-496, 1995.</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="8">M. Gonzalez-Alcorta, J. H. Dorfman, and G. M. Pesti, Maximizing Profit in Broiler Production as Prices Change: A Simple Approximation with Practice Value, &lt;i&gt;Agribusiness&lt;/i&gt;, 10, pp. 389-399, 1994.</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="9">K. A. Schwabe, Modeling State-Level Water Quality Management: The Case of the Neuse River Basin, &lt;i&gt;Resource and Energy Economics&lt;/i&gt;, 22, pp. 37-62, 2000.</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="10">F. Xu, T. Prato, and C. Fulcher, Broiler Litter Application to Land in an Agricultural Watershed: A GIS Approach, &lt;i&gt;Water Science Technology&lt;/i&gt;, 28, pp. 111-118, 1993.</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="11">K. Willett, T. Zhang, D. Willett, and W. F. McTernan, Regulating Pesticide Discharge into Surface and Groundwater Under Uncertainty, &lt;i&gt;Journal of Environmental Systems&lt;/i&gt;, 25, pp. 375-395, 1997.</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="12">E. Lichtenberg and D. Zilberman, Efficient Regulation of Environmental Health Risks, &lt;i&gt;Quarterly Journal of Economics&lt;/i&gt;, 49, pp. 167-178, 1988.</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="13">R. Horan and J. S. Shortle, Environmental Instruments for Agriculture, J. S. Shortle and D. Adler (eds.), &lt;i&gt;Environmental Policies for Agricultural Pollution Control&lt;/i&gt;, New York, pp. 19-65, 2001.</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
						</biblist>
					</ArticleHeader>
				</Article>
			</Issue>
		</Volume>
	</Journal>
</Publisher>
