10.2190/ES.31.2.a 2355153186403344 1 Community Views of Fairness in Environmental Conflicts: Evidence from Germany and Australia 117 140 20071207 20071207 20071207 20071207 2355153186403344.pdf http://baywood.metapress.com/link.asp?target=contribution&id=2355153186403344 2 Elisabeth Kals Geoffrey J. Syme Juliane D. Kärcher Markus M. Müller Blair E. Nancarrow Catholic University Eichstätt-Ingolstadt, Germany CSIRO Land and Water, Australia Catholic University Eichstätt-Ingolstadt, Germany CSIRO, Australia There is a widespread assumption that the way communities view fairness in environmental conflicts is dominated by self-interests, especially in conflicts of interest ("to vote one's pocketbook," "not in my backyard"). This assumption is rarely questioned or empirically tested. Based on theories of psychology of social justice, two studies tested this hypothesis by contrasting motives of self-interest and justice in a German and an Australian dispute. Questionnaire data from both countries (NGermany = 309, NAustralia = 260) equally revealed that a) affected and non-affected people do not make different judgments of what is fair in the conflict and b) overall fairness judgments are not only based on self-interest, but to the same extent on justice considerations. The results have important impacts on theoretical model building as well as planning and decision-making in environmental conflicts.

M. Stephan, Democracy in Our Backyards: A Study of Community Involvement in Administrative Decision Making, Environment and Behavior, 37:5, pp. 662-682, 2005.

M. Van Vugt, A. Biel, M. Snyder, and T. R. Tyler, Perspectives on Cooperation in Modern Society, in Cooperation in Modern Society: Promoting the Welfare of Communities, States, and Organizations, M. Van Vugt, M. Snyder, T. Tyler, and A. Biel (eds.), Routledge, London, pp. 3-24, 2000.

J. Vining, Public Attitudes toward Forest Management in an Illinois National Forest, Journal of Environmental Systems, 30:2, pp. 147-157, 2003-2004.

G. J. Syme, B. E. Nancarrow, and B. S. Jorgensen, The Limits of Environmental Responsibility: A Stormwater Case Study, Environment and Behavior, 34:6, pp. 875-885, 2002.

B. K. Marshall, J. S. Picou, and C. A. Bevc, Ecological Disaster as Contextual Information: Environmental Values in a Renewable Resource Community, Environment and Behavior, 37:5, pp. 706-728, 2005.

M. J. Lerner, The Justice Motive: Where Social Psychologists Found It, How They Lost It, and Why They May Not Find It Again, Personality and Social Psychology Review, 7:4, pp. 388-399, 2003.

S. Lindenberg, An Assessment of the New Political Economy, Sociological Theory, 3:1, pp. 99-114, 1985.

S. A. Banducci and J. A. Karp, Perceptions of Fairness and Support for Proportional Representation, Political Behavior, 21:3, pp. 217-238, 1999.

D. T. Miller and R. K. Ratner, The Power of the Myth of Self-Interest, in Current Societal Issues in Justice, L. Montada and M. J. Lerner (eds.), Plenum Press, New York, pp. 25-48, 1996.

R. K. Ratner and D. T. Miller, The Norm of Self-Interest and Its Effects on Social Action, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81:1, pp. 5-16, 2001.

G. J. Syme and D. M. Fenton, Perceptions of Equity and Procedural Preferences for Water Allocation Decisions, Society and National Resources, 6:4, pp. 347-360, 1993.

G. J. Syme and B. E. Nancarrow, The Determinants of Perceptions of Fairness in the Allocation of Water to Multiple Uses, Water Resources Research, 33:9, pp. 2143-2152, 1997.

C. K. W. De Dreu and P. J. Carnevale, Motivational Bases of Information Processing and Strategy in Conflict and Negotiation, in Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 35), M. P. Zanna (ed.), Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 235-291, 2003.

D. G. Pruitt, Social Conflict, in The Handbook of Social Psychology (Vol. 2), D. T. Gilbert and S. T. Fiske (eds.), McGraw-Hill, New York, pp. 470-503, 1998.

P. Abell (ed.), Rational Choice Theory, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1991.

G. S. Becker, The Economic Approach to Human Behavior, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1976.

J. Elster (ed.), Rational Choice, Basil Blackwell, Oxford, 1986.

C. Jencks, Varieties of Altruism, in Beyond Self-Interest, J. J. Mansbridge (ed.), University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 53-67, 1990.

T. R. Tyler and R. M. Dawes, Fairness in Groups: Comparing the Self-Interest and Social Identity Perspectives, in Psychological Perspectives on Justice: Theory and Applications, B. A. Mellers and J. Baron (eds.), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 87-108, 1993.

M. J. Lerner, The Justice Motive in Human Relations, The Justice Motive in Social Behavior Adapting to Times of Scarcity and Change, in M. J. Lerner and S. C. Lerner (eds.), Plenum Press, New York, pp. 11-35, 1981.

L. Montada, Justice: Just a Rational Choice? Social Justice Research, 11:2, pp. 81-101, 1998.

J. J. Mansbridge, Rational Choice Gains by Losing, Political Psychology, 16:1, pp. 137-155, 1995.

J. Thibaut and L. Walker, Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis, 1975.

R. Folger, Distributive and Procedural Justice: Multifaceted Meanings and Inter-relations, Social Justice Research, 9:4, pp. 395-416, 1996.

L. J. Skitka, Do the Means Always Justify the Ends, or Do the Ends Sometimes Justify the Means? A Value Protection Model of Justice Reasoning, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28:5, pp. 588-597, 2002.

K. Y. Törnblom and R. Vermunt, An Integrative Perspective on Social Justice: Distributive and Procedural Fairness Evaluations of Positive and Negative Outcome Allocations, Social Justice Research, 12:1, pp. 39-64, 1999.

M. Van Vugt, Community Identification Moderating the Impact of Financial Incentives in a Natural Social Dilemma: Water Conservation, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27:11, pp. 1440-1449, 2001.

T. R. Tyler and E. A. Lind, A Relational Model of Authority, in Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 25), M. P. Zanna (ed.), Academic Press, San Diego, pp. 115-191, 1992.

G. Jasso, Culture and the Sense of Justice: A Comprehensive Framework for Analysis, Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36:1, pp. 14-47, 2005.

G. J. Syme, E. Kals, B. E. Nancarrow, and L. Montada, Ecological Risks and Community Perceptions of Fairness and Justice: A Cross-Cultural Model, Risk Analysis, 20:6, pp. 905-916, 2000.

C. Mikula and M. Wenzel, Justice and Social Conflict, International Journal of Psychology, 35:2, pp. 126-135, 2000.

M. L. Ambrose, Contemporary Justice Research: A New Look at Familiar Questions, Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 89:1, pp. 803-812, 2002.

D. M. Messick and K. P. Sentis, Fairness and Preference, Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 15:4, pp. 418-434, 1979.

L. Thompson and G. F. Loewenstein, Egocentric Interpretations of Fairness and Interpersonal Conflict, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 51:2, pp. 176-197, 1992.

K. A. Wade-Benzoni, A. E. Tenbrunsel, and M. H. Bazerman, Egocentric Interpretations of Fairness in Asymmetric, Environmental Social Dilemmas: Explaining Harvesting Behavior and the Role of Communication, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 67:2, pp. 111-126, 1996.

M. M. Müller, E. Kals, and J. Maes, Fairness, Self-Interest, and Cooperation in a Real-Life Conflict, Journal of Applied Social Psychology, in press.

Y. Cohen-Charash and P. E. Spector, The Role of Justice in Organizations: A Meta-Analysis, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86:2, pp. 278-321, 2001.

J. A. Colquitt, D. E. Conlon, and M. J. Wesson, Justice at the Millennium: A Meta-Analytic Review of 25 Years of Organizational Justice Research, Journal of Applied Psychology, 86:3, pp. 425-445, 2001.

E. A. Lind and T. R. Tyler, The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice, 1988.

W. R. Freudenburg and S. K. Pastor, NlMBYs and LULUs: Stalking the Syndromes, Journal of Social Issues, 48:4, pp. 39-61, 1992.

J. Stöber, Die Soziale-Erwünschtheits-Skala-17 (SES-17): Entwicklung und erste Befunde zu Reliabilität und Validität [The Social Desirability Scale: Construction and First Results Regarding Reliability and Validity], Diagnostica, 45:4, pp. 173-177, 1999.

E. Kals and Y. Russell, Individual Conceptions of Justice and Their Potential for Explaining Proenvironmental Decision Making, Social Justice Research, 14:4, pp. 367-385, 2001.

E Kals, D. Schumacher, and L. Montada, Emotional Affinity toward Nature as a Motivational Basis to Protect Nature, Environment and Behavior, 31:2, pp. 178-202, 1999.

M. Müller, E. Kals, and F. H. Müller, Lernverhalten und Eigennutz [Learning Behavior and Self-Interest], Grundlagen der Weiterbildung: Zeitschrift für Weiterbildung und Bildungspolitik im In- und Ausland, 2/2003, pp. 61-68, 2003.

C. S. Johnston, J. Kärcher, B. E. Nancarrow, and G. J. Syme, Predicting Justice in Environmental Decision-Making. Testing a Cross-Cultural Model, CSIRO Land and Water, Perth, 2001.

C. S. Johnston, E. Kington, and G. J. Syme, Incorporating Fairness into Natural Resource Management in the Northern Agricultural Region: Stakeholder Workshop—The Key Outcomes, CSIRO Land and Water, Perth, 2003.

B. E. Nancarrow, C. S. Johnston, and G. J. Syme, Community Perceptions of Roles, Responsibilities and Funding for Natural Resources Management in the Moore Catchment, CSIRO Land and Water, Perth, 2002.

G. J. Syme and B. E. Nancarrow, Evaluation of Public Involvement Programs: Measuring Justice and Process Criteria, Water, 29:4, pp. 18-24, 2002.

R. J. Bies and J. S. Moag, Interactional Justice: Communication Criteria of Fairness, in Research on Negotiation in Organizations (Vol. 1), R. J. Lewicki, B. H. Sheppard, and M. H. Bazerman (eds.), JAI Press, Greenwich, pp. 43-55, 1986.

T. R. Tyler and S. L. Blader, Cooperation in Groups. Procedural Justice, Social Identity, and Behavioral Engagement, Psychology Press, Philadelphia, 2000.

S. L. Blader and T. R. Tyler, A Four Component Model of Procedural Justice: Defining the Meaning of a "Fair" Process, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29:6, pp. 747-758, 2003.

J. A. Colquitt, On the Dimensionality of Organizational Justice: A Construct Validation of a Measure, Journal of Applied Psychology, 86:3, pp. 386-400, 2001.

B. E. Nancarrow and G. J. Syme, Challenges in Implementing Justice Research in the Allocation of Natural Resources, Social Justice Research, 14:4, pp. 441-452, 2001.

L. Thompson and D. Hrebec, Lose-Lose Agreements in Interdependent Decision Making, Psychological Bulletin, 120:3, pp. 369-409, 1996.

E. Kals, M. Müller and J. Maes, Aufklärung hilft!—Mediation kommunalpolitischer Konflikte [Information Helps!—Mediation of Local Political Conflicts], Psychologie in Österreich, 22:5, pp. 227-232, 2002.

R. S. Peterson, The Role of Values in Predicting Fairness Judgments and the Support of Affirmative Action, Journal of Social Issues, 50:4, pp. 95-115, 1994.

J. A. Wall, Jr., J. B. Stark, and R. L. Standifer, Mediation: A Current Review and Theory Development, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 45:3, pp. 370-391, 2001.

L. Montada and E. Kals, Political Implications of Psychological Research on Ecological Justice and Proenvironmental Behaviour, International Journal of Psychology, 35:2, pp. 168-176, 2000.

J. A. Joireman, P. A. M. Van Lange, and M. Van Vugt, Who Cares About the Environmental Impact of Cars? Those With an Eye toward the Future, Environment & Behavior, 36:2, pp. 187-206, 2004.