10.2190/ES.32.2.b 4H3451143L57W454 2 Cadmium Leachability and Microbial Population Dynamics in a Stabilized and Bioaugmented Model Contaminated Soil 93 108 20110111 20110111 20110111 20110111 4H3451143L57W454.pdf http://baywood.metapress.com/link.asp?target=contribution&id=4H3451143L57W454 2 U. E. Duru A. Al-Tabbaa University of Cambridge This article presents a laboratory study on the consequences of the application of combined soil stabilization and bioaugmentation in the remediation of a model contaminated soil. Stabilization and bioaugmentation are two techniques commonly applied independently for the remediation of heavy metal and organic contamination respectively. However, for a cocktail of contaminants combined treatments are currently being considered. The model soil was contaminated with a cocktail of organics and heavy metals based on the soil and contaminant conditions in a real contaminated site. The soil stabilization treatment was applied using either zeolite or green waste compost as additives and a commercially available hydrocarbon degrading microbial consortium was used for the bioaugmentation treatment. The effects of stabilization with or without bioaugmentation on the leachability of cadmium and copper was observed using an EU batch leaching test procedure and a flow-through column leaching test, both using deionized water at a pH of 5.6. In addition, the population of hydrocarbon degrading microorganisms was monitored using a modified plate count procedure in cases where bioaugmentation was applied. It was found that while the stabilization treatment reduced the metal leachability by up to 60%, the bioaugmentation treatment increased it by up to 100% Microbial survival was also higher in the stabilized soil samples. Al-Tabbaa, A., & Evans, C. W. (1998). Pilot in situ auger mixing treatment of a contaminated site. Part 4: Treatability study. <i>Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, Geotechnical Engineering, 131</i>, pp. 52-59. British Standards Institution. (2002). <i>Characterization of waste-Leaching-Compliance test for leaching of granular waste materials and sludges.</i> London: BS EN 12457: Parts 1 to 4. Brown, S., Chaney, R., & Angle, J. S. (1997). Subsurface liming and metal movements in soils amended with lime-stabilised biosolids. <i>Journal of Environmental Quality, 26</i>, 724-732. Burgstaller, W., & Schinner, F. (1993). Leaching of metals with fungi. <i>Journal of Biotechnology, 27</i>, 91-116. Chander, K., & Joergensen, R. G. (2002). Decomposition of ¹⁴C labelled glucose in a Pb-contaminated soil remediated with synthetic zeolite and other amendments, <i>Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 34</i>, 643-649. Chen, Z. S., Lee G. J., & Liu J. C. (2000). The effects of chemical remediation treatments on the extractability and speciation of cadmium and lead in contaminated soils. <i>Chemosphere, 41</i>, 235-242. Cleveland Biotech Ltd, (2004). 3 Vanguard Court, Preston Farm Business Park, Stockton on Tees, England. Personal communication. Diels, L., De Smet, M., Hooyberghs, L., & Corbisier, P. (1999). Heavy metals bioremediation of soil. <i>Molecular Biotechnology, 12</i>, 149-158. Duru, U. E. (2004). <i>Combined Immobilisation and Bioremediation of Contaminated Soil.</i> MPhil. thesis. University of Cambridge, Cambridge. Duru, U. E., & Al-Tabbaa, A. (2005). Effect of microbial activity on the mobility of copper in stabilised contaminated soil. <i>Proceedings of the International Conference on Stabilisation/Solidification Treatment and Remediation</i>, Cambridge, UK, April, pp. 323-333. Dyer, A. (1998). <i>An introduction to zeolite molecular sieves.</i> Chichester, UK: J. Wiley & Sons. European Union (EU). (1999). <i>Council Directive 1999/31/EC of 26 April 1999 on the Landfill of Waste.</i> Brussels: The Council of the European Union. Ghazali, F. M., Rahman, R. N., Salleh, A. B., & Basri, M. (2004). Biodegradation of hydrocarbon in soil by microbial consortium. <i>International Biodeterioration and Biodegradation, 54</i>, 61-67. Huang, M., Xu, Z., Gu, Q., Wang, Y., Cao, Y., Du, X., et al. (2005). Competitive sorption behaviour of copper (II) and herbicide propisochlor on humic acids. <i>Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, 287</i>, 422-427. Iwamoto, T., & Nasu, M. (2001). Current bioremediation practice and perspective. <i>Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering, 92</i>, 1-8. Jackson, D. R., Garrett, B. C., & Bishop, T. A. (1984). Comparison of batch and column methods for assessing leachability of hazardous waste. <i>Environmental Science Technology, 18</i>, 26-38. Kiikkila, O., Pennanen, T., Perkiomaki, T., Derome, J., & Fritze, H. (2002). Organic materials as a copper immobilising agent: A microcosm study on remediation. <i>Basic and Applied Ecology, 3</i>, 245-253. Lofts, S., Tipping, E. W., Sanchez, A. L., & Dodd, B. A. (2002). Modelling the role of humic acid in radiocaesium distribution in a British upland peat soil. <i>Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 61</i>, 133-147. Margesin, R., Labbe, D., Schinner, F., & Greer, C. W. (2003). Characterization of hydrocarbon-degrading microbial population in contaminated and pristine alpine soils. <i>Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 69</i>, 3085-3092. Nissen, L. R., Lepp, N. W., & Edwards, R. (2000). Synthetic zeolites as amendments for sewage sludge-based compost. <i>Chemosphere, 41</i>, 265-269.