10.2190/ES.32.4.b F31714387VM726K7 2 Scientists' Perceptions of Objectivity and Advocacy: Making the Linkage of Science to Environmental Policy 291 310 20111121 20111121 20111121 20111121 F31714387VM726K7.pdf http://baywood.metapress.com/link.asp?target=contribution&id=F31714387VM726K7 4 Leslie R. Alm Boise State University, Idaho There is no question that science plays a profound role in American public policymaking and that scientists are critical actors in the environmental policymaking process, serving as entrepreneurs, introducing, popularizing, and elevating environmental ideas onto national and international agendas. This article uses interviews with scientists to investigate the complexities of linking science to environmental policy, with special attention given to how scientists view the concepts of advocacy, objectivity, and the separation of science and policy. Because of the importance of scientists to the environmental policymaking process, it is worth exploring what they have to say about linking science to policy. Interviews of scientists in 1997 and again in 2009 illustrate the fact that scientists remain committed to the ideal of objectivity, struggle with the trend toward advocacy by scientists, and are distrustful of the way science is used in the environmental policy-making process.

H. Ingram et al., Scientists and Agenda Setting: Advocacy and Global Warming, paper prepared for the Western Political Science Association Annual Meeting, Newport Beach, California, March 23, p. 2, 1990; K. Litfin, Ozone Discourses: Science and Politics in Global Environmental Cooperation, Columbia University Press, New York, pp. 9-10, 1994.

S. Jasanoff and M. Martello, Conclusion: Knowledge and Governance, in Earthly Politics: Local and Global in Environmental Governance, S. Jasanoff and M. Martello (eds.), MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, p. 337, 2004; J. Layzer, The Environmental Case: Translating Values Into Policy (2nd Edition), CQ Press, Washington, DC, p. 289, 2006; D. Nelkin, Science Controversies: The Dynamics of Public Disputes in the United States, in Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, S. Jasanoff et al. (eds.), Sage, Thousand Oaks, California, p. 452, 1995.

E. Skolnikoff, The Role of Science in Policy: The Climate Change Debate in the United States, Environment, 41, p. 19, 1999.

L. Caldwell, Binational Responsibilities for a Shared Environment, in Canada and the United States: Enduring Friendship, Persistent Stress, C. Doran and J. Sigler (eds.), Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, pp. 222-223, 1985.

W. Rosenbaum, Environmental Politics and Policy (7th Edition), CQ Press, Washington, DC, p. 31, 2008.

M. Shermer, The Borderlands of Science: Where Sense Meets Nonsense, Oxford University Press, New York, p. 177, 2001.

J. Gregory and S. Miller, Science in Public: Communication, Culture, and Credibility, Plenum Trade, New York, p. 250, 1998.

R. Masters, Beyond Relativism: Science and Human Values, University of New England Press, Hanover, New Hampshire, p. viii, 1993.

D. Sarewitz, Frontiers of Illusion: Science, Technology, and the Politics of Progress, Temple University Press, Philadelphia, p. 11, 1996; D. Sarewitz and R. Pielke, Jr., Prediction in Science and Policy, in Prediction: Science, Decision-Making, and the Future of Nature, D. Sarewitz, R. Pielke, Jr., and R. Byerly, Jr. (eds.), Island Press, Washington, DC, p. 11, 2000.

B. Bimber, The Politics of Expertise in Congress: The Rise and Fall of the Office of Technology Assessment, State University of New York Press, Albany, p. 2, 1996.

A. Lupia, Evaluating Political Science Research: Information for Buyers and Sellers, PS: Political Science and Politics, 33, p. 7, 2000.

A. Underdal, Science and Politics: The Anatomy of An Uneasy Partnership, in Science and Politics in International Environmental Regimes, S. Andresen et al. (eds.), Manchester University Press, Manchester, p. 5, 2000.

A. Ross, Introduction, in Science Wars, A. Ross (ed.), Duke University Press, Durham, North Carolina, p. 13, 1996.

K. Greif and J. Merz, Current Controversies in the Biological Sciences: Case Studies of Policy Challenges from New Technologies, MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, p. 1, 2007.

D. Sarewitz and R. Pielke, Jr., Reconciling Supply of and Demand for Science with Science Policy, Workshop on Carbon Science: Reconciling Supply and Demand, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado, September 16-17, p. 10, 2004; J. Van Beek and F. Isaacs, Convergence and Scientific Management, in Innovation, Science, and Environment: Canadian Policies and Performance, Glen Toner (ed.), McGill-Queen's University Press, Montreal, p. 211, 2008.

N. Ashford, Value Judgments and Risk Assessment, in Chemical Risk Assessment and Occupational Health, C. Smith, D. Christiana, and K. Kelsey (eds.), Auburn House, Westport, Connecticut, p. 199, 1994; J. Schmandt, Regulation and Science, Science, Technology, and Human Values, 9, p. 26, 1984.

J. Gregory and S. Miller, Science in Public: Communication, Culture, and Credibility, Plenum Trade, New York, p. 248, 1998; E. Wilson, Consilience: The Unity of Knowledge, Alfred A. Knopf, New York, p. 190, 1998.

J. Brainard, U.S. Agencies Look to Interdisciplinary Science, Chronicle of Higher Education, 48, p. A19, 2001; K. Hoover and T. Donovan, The Elements of Social Science Thinking (9th Edition), Thomson-Wadsworth, Boston, Massachusetts, p. 2, 2008.

B. Silver, The Ascent of Science, Solomon Press, New York, p. xiii, 1998.

D. Price, The Scientific Estate, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, p. 120, 1965.

B. Williams and A. Matheny, Democracy, Dialogue, and Environmental Disputes: The Contested Languages of Social Regulation, Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut, p. 11, 1995.

M. Bowen, Censoring Science: Inside the Political Attack on Dr. James Hansen and the Truth of Global Warming, Dutton, New York, pp. 231-232, 2008.

M. Morgan and J. Peha, Analysis, Governance, and the Need for Better Institutional Arrangements, in Science and Technology Advice for Congress, M. Morgan and J. Peha (eds.), Resources for the Future, Washington, DC, p. 3, 2003.

S. Jasanoff, The Fifth Branch: Science Advisers as Policymakers, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, p. 250, 1994.

W. Panofsky, Physics and Government, Physics Today, March, p. 35, 1999.

F. Lynn, The Interplay of Science and Values in Assessing and Regulating Environmental Risks, Science, Technology & Human Values, 11, p. 48, 1986.

M. Rushefsky, Elites and Environmental Policy, in Environmental Politics and Policy, J. Lester (ed.), Duke University Press, Durham, North Carolina, p. 283, 1995.

S. Yearly, The Environmental Challenge to Scientific Studies, in Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, S. Jasanoff, G. Markle, J. Peterson, and T. Pinch (eds.), Sage, Thousand Oaks, California, p. 462, 1995.

J. Carroll et al., The Greening of Faith: God, the Environment, and the Good Life, University Press of New England, Hanover, New Hampshire, p. 3, 1997.

A. Underdal, Science and Politics: The Anatomy of an Uneasy Partnership, in Science and Politics in International Environmental Regimes, S. Andresen et al. (eds.), Manchester University Press, Manchester, p. 3, 2000.

N. Miller, Environmental Politics: Stakeholders, Interests, and Policymaking (2nd Edition), Routledge, New York, p. 132, 2009.

K. Litfin, Ozone Discourses: Science and Politics in Global Environmental Cooperation, Columbia University Press, New York, p. 9, 1994.

M. Scully, Of Patronage and Exploitation, Chronicle of Higher Education, 49, p. B13, 2003.

J. Kingdon, Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies (2nd Edition), HarperCollins College Publishers, New York, 1995.

D. Sarewitz, Frontiers of Illusion: Science, Technology, and the Politics of Progress, Temple University Press, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, p. 3, 1996.

S. Rayner, Prediction and Other Approaches to Global Climate Change Policy, in Prediction: Science, Decision-Making, and the Future of Nature, D. Sarewitz, R. Pielke, Jr., and R. Byerly, Jr. (eds.), Island Press, Washington, DC, p. 292, 2000.

B. Martin and E. Richards, Scientific Knowledge, Controversy, and Public Decision Making, in Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, S. Jasanoff et al. (eds.), Sage, Thousand Oaks, California, p. 507, 1995.

M. Soroos, The Endangered Atmosphere: Preserving a Global Commons, University of South Carolina Press, Columbia, p. 17, 1997.

D. Guston, Between Politics and Science: Assuring the Integrity and Productivity of Research, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, p. 15, 2000.

S. Jasanoff, Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States, Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, p. 288, 2005.

H. Yen, Obama Names 4 Top Members of Science Team, Idaho Statesman, p. 16 Main, December 21, 2008.

S. Stalberg, Obama Puts His Own Spin on Mix of Science with Politics, New York Times, p. A18, March 10, 2009.

A. Meltsner, Policy Analysts in the Bureaucracy, University of California Press, Berkeley, p. 52, 1976.

P. Coontz, Ethics in Systematic Research, in Handbook of Research Methods in Public Administration, Gerald Miller and Marcia Whicker (eds.), Marcel Dekker, New York, p. 18, 1999.

B. Bimber, The Politics of Expertise in Congress: The Rise and Fall of the Office of Technology Assessment, State University of New York Press, Albany, p. 12, 1996.

B. Bimber, The Politics of Expertise in Congress: The Rise and Fall of the Office of Technology Assessment, State University of New York Press, Albany, p. 14, 1996.

D. Guston, Between Politics and Science: Assuring the Integrity and Productivity of Research, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, p. xv, 2000; B. Wilson, Politicizing Academic Freedom, Vulgarizing Scholarly Discourse, Chronicle of Higher Education, 44, p. A52, 1997.

R. Meyer, Intractable Debate: Why Congressional Hearings on Climate Fail to Advance Policy, Perspectives in Public Affairs, 3, p. 86, 2006.

A. Miller, The Role of Analytical Science in Natural Resource Decision Making, Environmental Management, 17, p. 570, 1993.

D. Collingridge and C. Reeve, Science Speaks to Power: The Role of Experts in Policy Making, St. Martin's Press, New York, p. 17, 1986; J. Layzer, The Environmental Case: Translating Values Into Policy (2nd Edition), CQ Press, Washington, p. 2, 2006.

S. Schneider, Is the ‘Citizen-Scientist’ an Oxymoron? in Science, Technology, and Democracy, D. Kleinman (ed.), State University of New York, Albany, p. 113, 2000.

R. Pielke, Jr., The Honest Broker: Making Sense of Science in Policy and Politics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, p. 121, 2007.

J. Lubchenco, Entering the Century of the Environment: A New Social Contract for Science, Science, Technology, & Human Values, 11, pp. 491-496, 1998; J. Myers and J. Reichert, Perspectives on Nature's Services, in Nature's Services: Societal Dependence on Nature's Ecosystems, G. Daily (ed.), Island Press, Washington, p. xix, 1997;

S. Meyer, The Role of Scientists in the ‘New Politics,’ Chronicle of Higher Education, 41, p. B1, 1995.

D. Collingridge and C. Reeve, Science Speaks to Power: The Role of Experts in Policy Making, St. Martin's Press, New York, p. 17, 1986; B. Steel, R. Clinton, and N. Lovrich, Environmental Politics and Policy: A Comparative Approach, McGraw-Hill, Boston, Massachusetts, pp. 54-55, 2003.

P. Ehrlich and A. Ehrlich, Betrayal of Science and Reason: How Anti-Environmental Rhetoric Threatens Our Future, Island Press, Washington, DC, p. 204, 1996.

C. Safina, To Save the Earth, Scientists Should Join Policy Debates, Chronicle of Higher Education, 45, p. A80, 1998.

J. Brainard, U.S. Agencies Look to Interdisciplinary Science, Chronicle of Higher Education, 48, p. A21, 2001; F. Zakaria, Science and the State, in In Scientific Cooperation, State Conflict: The Roles of Scientists in Mitigating International Discord, A. deCerreno and A. Keynan (eds.), The New York Academy of Sciences, New York, p. 261, 1998.

J. Primack and F. Von Hippel, Advice and Dissent: Scientists in the Political Arena, Basic Books, New York, p. 5, 1974.

K. N. Lee, Compass and Gyroscope: Integrating Science and Politics for the Environment, Island Press, Washington, DC, p. 167, 1993.

L. Alm, Scientists, Advocacy and Acid Rain, Journal of Environmental Systems, 26, pp. 249-263, 1997-98.