10.2190/VR55-DRTV-3AYX-85GQ VR55DRTV3AYX85GQ 3 Socioeconomic Impacts of Rural Land Use Control: a Simulation Study 279 297 20020509 20020509 20020509 20020509 VR55DRTV3AYX85GQ.pdf http://baywood.metapress.com/link.asp?target=contribution&id=VR55DRTV3AYX85GQ 4 Thomas E. Dickinson Seymour I. Schwartz Division of Environmental Studies, University of California, Davis The conversion of land for urban use is of concern not only at the urban fringe but also in the rural hinterlands, where large tracts have been subdivided and sold to urban residents for second homes or for speculation. To examine the consequences of policies for controlling rural land conversion, a systems dynamics model of land use and the economy of a rural California county was developed and simulated. The additional effects of reduced fuel availability on the tourist economy of the county are examined and the potential dangers and benefits of applying simulation methods to the policy making process are discussed.

James J. Parsons, "Slicing Up the Open Space: Subdivisions Without Homes in Northern California," Erdkunde, Vol. 26, No. 1, 1972, pp. 1-8.

California Department of Conservation, Division of Soil Conservation, The Environmental Impact of Urbanization in Foothill and Mountain California, Sacramento, 1971.

Thomas E. Dickinson, "Remote Subdivision Activity in 24 Northern California Counties, 1963-1970," unpublished data.

University of California, Agricultural Extension, Plumas County Selected Economic Data, Quincy, California.

California Department of Human Resources Development, California Manpower Indicators from the 1970 Census, Plumas County, Sacramento, July 1972.

L. A. Fites, Plumas County Taxation Impact Study, Office of the Planning Director, County of Plumas, Quincy, California, May 25, 1972.

L. A. Fites, Vacant Lot Study in Plumas County, Office of the Planning Director, County of Plumas, Quincy, California, September 1, 1972.

Jay W. Forrester, Principles of Systems, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Wright-Allen Press, 1968.

Jay W. Forrester, Urban Dynamics, Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press, 1969.

Leo P. Kadanoff, "From Simulation Model to Public Policy," American Scientist, 60 (Jan.-Feb., 1972), pp. 74-79.

Martin Shubik, Review, "Modeling on a Grand Scale," of World Dynamics by J. W. Forrester, Science, Vol. 174, No. 4013, p. 1014, Dec. 3, 1971.

Jay W. Forrester, "Counterintuitive Behavior of Social Systems," Technology Review 73 (Jan. 1971).

H. R. Hamilton, S. E. Goldstone, et al., System Simulation for Regional Analysis: An Application to River Basin Planning. Cambridge: The MIT Press, 1969.

Theodore Roszak, "Technocracy: Depotism of Benificient Expertise," The Nation, Sept. 1, 1969, pp. 180-190.

Michael A. Goldberg, "The Last of the Dinosaurs or the First of the Primates: Yet Another Simulation Study," Faculty of Commerce and Business Administration, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B. C., Mimeo, 1972.

S. I. Schwartz and T. C. Foin, "A Critical Review of the Social Systems Models of Jay Forrester," Human Ecology, pp. 161-173, Vol. 1, No. 2, 1972.

Ronald Drake, et al., Selected Economic Consequences of Recreational Development: Tuolumne County, Case Study, Agricultural Extension, University of California, No. 68-4, Berkeley: August, 1968.

William Bryan, The Effects of Growth on the Urban Environment, Interdisciplinary Systems Group, Project Report #6 NSF GI-27, University of California, Davis, 1972.

Gregory D. Tillson, et al., Local Tax Impact of Recreational Subdivisions: A Case Study, Oregon State University Extension Service, Special Report 365, Corvallis: July 1972.

Comment, "Aftermammoth: Friends of Mammoth and the Amended California Environmental Quality Act," Ecology Law Quarterly 3 (1973) 349-389.

Hudson, Barclay M., Martin Wachs, and Joseph L. Schofer, "Local Impact Evaluation in the Design of Large-Scale Urban Systems," J. American Institute of Planners, 40 (1974) 255-265.