10.2190/C1FA-9U9P-NTQC-CNM7 C1FA9U9PNTQCCNM7 3 The Use of Criteria in a Corridor Selection Analysis 123 128 20020509 20020509 20020509 20020509 C1FA9U9PNTQCCNM7.pdf http://baywood.metapress.com/link.asp?target=contribution&id=C1FA9U9PNTQCCNM7 2 R. W. Hufstader VTN Environmental Sciences, Portland, Oregon The use of criteria to determine an environmentally acceptable corridor for a power transmission line is discussed. The method involves 1) development of criteria, 2) compatibility rating of alternative routes on the basis of the criteria selected, and 3) ranking the alternative corridors in a quantitative manner. Criteria were developed within the resource categories of Ecology, Land Use, Aesthetics, Land Economics and Engineering. The method provides a concise, useable ranking of alternate corridors. P. Newman, Environmental Impact: Part 1, <i>Journal of Environmental Systems, 4</i>, pp. 97-108, 1974. P. Newman, Environmental Impact: Part 2, <i>Journal of Environmental Systems, 4</i>, pp. 109-116, 1974. E. J. Cantilli and J. C. Falcocchio, Suggested Guidelines for the Analysis and Interpretation of Environmental Effects of Transportation Facilities, <i>Journal of Environmental Systems, 6</i>, pp. 83-104, 1977. B. Loran, Quantitative Assessment of Environmental Impact, <i>Journal of Environmental Systems, 5</i>, pp. 247-256, 1975. F. H. Rohles, The Ecosystem Complex: A New Approach in Specifying the Man-Environment Relationship, <i>Journal of Environmental Systems, 1</i>, pp. 321-328, 1971. D. Panagiotakopoulos, A Multi-Objective Framework for Environmental Management Using Goal Programming, <i>Journal of Environmental Systems, 5</i>, pp. 133-147, 1975. R. W. Hufstader, Generalized Criteria and Environmental Impact Analysis, <i>Journal of Environmental Systems, 7</i>, pp. 115-119, 1977-78.