<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE Publisher PUBLIC "-//MetaPress//DTD MetaPress 2.0//EN" "http://public.metapress.com/dtd/MPRESS/MetaPressv2.dtd">
<Publisher>
	<PublisherInfo>
		<PublisherName>Baywood Publishing Company</PublisherName>
	</PublisherInfo>
	<Journal>
		<JournalInfo JournalType="Journals">
			<JournalPrintISSN>1055-7512</JournalPrintISSN>
			<JournalElectronicISSN>1541-3799</JournalElectronicISSN>
			<JournalTitle>Journal of Individual Employment Rights</JournalTitle>
			<JournalCode>BWIE</JournalCode>
			<JournalID>300324</JournalID>
			<JournalURL>http://baywood.metapress.com/link.asp?target=journal&amp;id=300324</JournalURL>
		</JournalInfo>
		<Volume>
			<VolumeInfo>
				<VolumeNumber>10</VolumeNumber>
			</VolumeInfo>
			<Issue>
				<IssueInfo IssueType="Regular">
					<IssueNumberBegin>2</IssueNumberBegin>
					<IssueNumberEnd>2</IssueNumberEnd>
					<IssueSupplement>0</IssueSupplement>
					<IssuePartStart>0</IssuePartStart>
					<IssuePartEnd>0</IssuePartEnd>
					<IssueSequence>000010000220010401</IssueSequence>
					<IssuePublicationDate>
						<CoverDate Year="2001" Month="4" Day="1"/>
						<CoverDisplay>Number 2/2001-2002</CoverDisplay>
					</IssuePublicationDate>
					<IssueID>KRALBL9CPKXT</IssueID>
					<IssueURL>http://baywood.metapress.com/link.asp?target=issue&amp;id=KRALBL9CPKXT</IssueURL>
				</IssueInfo>
				<Article ArticleType="Original">
					<ArticleInfo Free="No" ESM="No">
						<ArticleDOI>10.2190/ALF3-7DY5-ML83-Y2TK</ArticleDOI>
						<ArticlePII>ALF37DY5ML83Y2TK</ArticlePII>
						<ArticleSequenceNumber>103</ArticleSequenceNumber>
						<ArticleTitle Language="En">RELIGIOUS ACCOMMODATION AND THE COURTS: A REVIEW AND ANALYSIS</ArticleTitle>
						<ArticleFirstPage>103</ArticleFirstPage>
						<ArticleLastPage>117</ArticleLastPage>
						<ArticleHistory>
							<RegistrationDate>20031021</RegistrationDate>
							<ReceivedDate>20031021</ReceivedDate>
							<Accepted>20031021</Accepted>
							<OnlineDate>20031021</OnlineDate>
						</ArticleHistory>
						<FullTextFileName>ALF37DY5ML83Y2TK.pdf</FullTextFileName>
						<FullTextURL>http://baywood.metapress.com/link.asp?target=contribution&amp;id=ALF37DY5ML83Y2TK</FullTextURL>
						<Composite>2</Composite>
					</ArticleInfo>
					<ArticleHeader>
						<AuthorGroup>
							<Author>
								<GivenName>LAWRENCE S.</GivenName>
								<Initials/>
								<FamilyName>KLEIMAN</FamilyName>
								<Degrees/>
								<Roles/>
							</Author>
							<Author AffiliationID="A2">
								<GivenName>JOAN</GivenName>
								<Initials/>
								<FamilyName>BENEK-RIVERA</FamilyName>
								<Degrees/>
								<Roles/>
							</Author>
							<Affiliation AFFID="A2">
								<OrgDivision/>
								<OrgName>Bloomsburg University, Pennsylvania</OrgName>
								<OrgAddress/>
							</Affiliation>
						</AuthorGroup>
						<Abstract Language="En">This article reviews case law dealing with claims of religious accommodation discrimination filed under the Civil Rights Act. This article is intended to provide employers with a better understanding of how the courts adjudicate these types of cases. The article is divided into three sections. The first two sections examine the type of evidence needed by a plaintiff to establish a prima facie case of religious discrimination and the requirements for an effective defense. The third section addresses areas of potential concerns for organizations in light of the judicial decisions reviewed and offers recommendations for avoiding/defending claims of religious accommodation discrimination.</Abstract>
						<biblist>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="1">www.eeoc.gov/stats/religion.html</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="2">Shelton v. University of Medicine &amp; Dentistry of New Jersey, 223 F.3d 220 (3rd Cir. 2000).</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="3">H. M. Findley, F. Ingram, and G. Amsler, Religious Accommodation Principles for Employers, Journal of Individual Employment Rights, 9:3, pp. 211-226, 2000-2001.</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="4">Hussein v. Waldorf Astoria, 134 F. Supp 2d. 591 (2001, S.D., NY).</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="5">Bruff v. North Mississippi Health Services, 244 F.3d 495 (5th Cir. 2001).</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="6">Anderson v. U. S.F Logistics, 274 F.3d 470 (7th Cir. 2001).</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="7">Jones v. N.Y.C. Department of Corrections, 99 Civ. 10031 (2000, S.D., NY).</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="8">Hussein v. Hotel Employees and Restaurant Union, 108 F. Supp 2d. 360 (2000, S.D., NY).</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="9">Stone v. West, 133 F. Supp. 2d. 972 (2001, E.D., MI).</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="10">Bushouse v. Local Union, 164 F. Supp. 2d 1066 (2001, N.D., IN).</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="11">Weber v. Roadway Express, 199 F.3d 270 (5th Cir. 2000).</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="12">Hussein v. Pierre Hotel, 99 Civ. 2715 (2001, S.D., NY).</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="13">Durant v. Nynex and Bell Atlantic Corp., 101 F. Supp. 2d 227 (2000, S.D., NY).</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="14">Thomas v. National Association of Letter Carriers, 225 F.3d. 1149 (10th Cir. 2000).</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="15">Beam v. General Motors, C78-1130A (1979, N.D. OH).</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="16">TWA v. Hardison, 432 U.S. 63, 97 S. Ct. 2264 (1977).</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="17">Baltgalvis v. Newport News Shipbuilding, 132 F. Supp. 2d 414 (2001, E.D, VA).</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="18">Daniels v. Arlington, 246 F.3d. 500 (5th Cir. 2001).</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="19">Cosme v. Henderson, 287 F.3d 152 (2nd Cir. 2002).</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="20">Ansonia Board of Education v. Philbrook, 479 U.S. 60, 107 S. Ct 367 (1986).</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="21">Quental v. Connecticut Commission on the Deaf and Hearing Impaired, 122 F. Supp. 2d. 133 (2000, D.C., CT).</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
						</biblist>
					</ArticleHeader>
				</Article>
			</Issue>
		</Volume>
	</Journal>
</Publisher>
