<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE Publisher PUBLIC "-//MetaPress//DTD MetaPress 2.0//EN" "http://public.metapress.com/dtd/MPRESS/MetaPressv2.dtd">
<Publisher>
	<PublisherInfo>
		<PublisherName>Baywood Publishing Company</PublisherName>
	</PublisherInfo>
	<Journal>
		<JournalInfo JournalType="Journals">
			<JournalPrintISSN>1055-7512</JournalPrintISSN>
			<JournalElectronicISSN>1541-3799</JournalElectronicISSN>
			<JournalTitle>Journal of Individual Employment Rights</JournalTitle>
			<JournalCode>BWIE</JournalCode>
			<JournalID>300324</JournalID>
			<JournalURL>http://baywood.metapress.com/link.asp?target=journal&amp;id=300324</JournalURL>
		</JournalInfo>
		<Volume>
			<VolumeInfo>
				<VolumeNumber>10</VolumeNumber>
			</VolumeInfo>
			<Issue>
				<IssueInfo IssueType="Regular">
					<IssueNumberBegin>2</IssueNumberBegin>
					<IssueNumberEnd>2</IssueNumberEnd>
					<IssueSupplement>0</IssueSupplement>
					<IssuePartStart>0</IssuePartStart>
					<IssuePartEnd>0</IssuePartEnd>
					<IssueSequence>000010000220010401</IssueSequence>
					<IssuePublicationDate>
						<CoverDate Year="2001" Month="4" Day="1"/>
						<CoverDisplay>Number 2/2001-2002</CoverDisplay>
					</IssuePublicationDate>
					<IssueID>KRALBL9CPKXT</IssueID>
					<IssueURL>http://baywood.metapress.com/link.asp?target=issue&amp;id=KRALBL9CPKXT</IssueURL>
				</IssueInfo>
				<Article ArticleType="Original">
					<ArticleInfo Free="No" ESM="No">
						<ArticleDOI>10.2190/KWLF-LF8A-1D4P-C9JE</ArticleDOI>
						<ArticlePII>KWLFLF8A1D4PC9JE</ArticlePII>
						<ArticleSequenceNumber>87</ArticleSequenceNumber>
						<ArticleTitle Language="En">FAITH-BASED INITIATIVES: CONSTITUTIONALITY AND EMPLOYMENT IMPLICATIONS</ArticleTitle>
						<ArticleFirstPage>87</ArticleFirstPage>
						<ArticleLastPage>101</ArticleLastPage>
						<ArticleHistory>
							<RegistrationDate>20031021</RegistrationDate>
							<ReceivedDate>20031021</ReceivedDate>
							<Accepted>20031021</Accepted>
							<OnlineDate>20031021</OnlineDate>
						</ArticleHistory>
						<FullTextFileName>KWLFLF8A1D4PC9JE.pdf</FullTextFileName>
						<FullTextURL>http://baywood.metapress.com/link.asp?target=contribution&amp;id=KWLFLF8A1D4PC9JE</FullTextURL>
						<Composite>2</Composite>
					</ArticleInfo>
					<ArticleHeader>
						<AuthorGroup>
							<Author>
								<GivenName>HENRY</GivenName>
								<Initials/>
								<FamilyName>FINDLEY</FamilyName>
								<Degrees/>
								<Roles/>
							</Author>
							<Author>
								<GivenName>EARL</GivenName>
								<Initials/>
								<FamilyName>INGRAM</FamilyName>
								<Degrees/>
								<Roles/>
							</Author>
							<Author AffiliationID="A3">
								<GivenName>SABRENA</GivenName>
								<Initials/>
								<FamilyName>MOTEN</FamilyName>
								<Degrees/>
								<Roles/>
							</Author>
							<Affiliation AFFID="A3">
								<OrgDivision/>
								<OrgName>Troy State University, Alabama</OrgName>
								<OrgAddress/>
							</Affiliation>
						</AuthorGroup>
						<Abstract Language="En">Passage of faith-based aid to religious charities appears imminent and government barriers to faith-based organizations competing for government funding have been removed by executive order. The impact of these changes should be significant because today many thousands of religious organizations exist, employing several million workers. This article reviews the constitutional and employment implications of actual and contemplated initiatives that would provide such organizations with federal aid for nonreligious activities. In general, aid to religious organizations has been deemed constitutional as long as it is appropriately tailored and the religious organization meets certain guidelines. Faith-based organizations may discriminate based on religion when selecting those involved in ministerial positions. However, with respect to other positions, they cannot discriminate based on sex, race, age, etc. unless it is consistent with their religious beliefs. Thus their &quot;right to discriminate&quot; may not be much greater than that allowed to nonfaith-based organizations.</Abstract>
						<biblist>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="1">Agostini v. Felton, 521 U.S. 203 (Supreme Court, 1997).</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="2">Zelman v. Doris Simmons-Harris et al., 122 S. Ct. 2460 (2002).</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="3">McClure v. The Salvation Army, 460 F.2d 553 (5th Cir. 1972).</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="4">NLRB v. Catholic Bishop of Chicago, et al., 440 U.S. 490 (1979).</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="5">Ombudsman Watch, 2002 Faith-Based Initiative: Summary of Compromise Bill, www.ombwatch.org/npadv/2002/sanlibdraft.html.</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="6">Bayamon v. NLRB, 793 F.2d 383 (1st Cir. 1986).</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="7">Wisconsin v. Yoder, 406 U.S. 205 (1972).</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="8">Sherbert v. Verner, 374 U.S. 398 (1963).</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="9">Rayburn v. General Conference of Seventh-day Adventists, 478 U.S. 1020 (1986).</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="10">G. Jackson, Labor and Employment Law Desk Book (2nd ed.), Prentice Hall, Paramus, New Jersey, 2000.</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="11">C. Woolsey, Off-Duty Conduct None of the Employer's Business? Chicago, Business Insurance, 26:7, p. 10, February 17, 1992.</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="12">Ed. Firms Find it Tougher to Dismiss Employees for Off-Duty Conduct, New York, Wall Street Journal, p. 1, March 29, 1988.</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="13">Lemon v.Kurtzman, 403 U.S. 602 (1971).</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="14">Williamson v. A.G. Edwards &amp; Sons, Inc., 876 F.2d 69 (8th Cir. 1989).</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="15">Reynolds v. United States, 98 U.S. 145 (1878).</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="16">Boyd v. Harding Academy, 88 F.3d 410 (6th Cir. 1996).</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="17">42 U.S.C. Sec. 703.</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="18">Pime v. Loyola University of Chicago, 803 F.2d 351 (7th Cir. 1986).</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="19">Mildred Kern v. Dynalectron Corporation, 577 F.Supp. 1196 (Dist. Ct. Northern Dist. of Tx. 1986).</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="20">Boyd v. Harding Academy, 887 F.Supp. 157 (Dist. Ct. for Western Tenn. 1995).</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="21">EEOC v. Mississippi College, 453 U.S. 912 (1981).</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="22">Little v. Wuerf, 929 F.2d 944 (3rd Cir. 1991).</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="23">EEOC v. Mississippi College, 626 F.2d 477 (5th Cir. 1980).</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="24">EEOC v. Kamehameha Schools/Bishop Estate, 990 F.2d 458 (9th Cir. 1993).</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="25">Killinger v. Samford University, 113 F.3d 196 (11th Cir. 1997).</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="26">Fike v. United Methodist Children's Home of Virginia, Inc., 547 F.Supp. 286 (E.D. Va. 1982).</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="27">Civil Rights Act, 1964 as amended 1991, 42 U.S.C. Sec. 702.</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="28">Presiding Bishop of the Church of Jesus of Latter-Day Saints et al. v. Amos et al., 483 U.S. 327 (1987).</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="29">Feldstein v. The Christian Science Monitor, 555 F. Supp. 974 (Dist. Ct. of Mass. 1983).</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="30">D. Bennett-Alexander and L. Hartman, L., Employment Law for Business (3rd ed.), Irwin, Boston, 2001.</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="31">DeSantis v. Pacific Telephone &amp; Telegraph Co. Inc., 608 F.2d 327 (9th Cir. 1979).</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="32">EEOC v. Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary, 651 F.2d 277 (5th Cir. 1981).</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="33">L. Goodstein, Voucher Ruling Seen as Further Narrowing Church-State Division, New York Times, New York, p. A.24, June 28, 2002.</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="34">K. Hall (ed.), The Oxford Companion to the Supreme Court of the United States, Oxford University Press, New York, 1992.</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="35">M. Walsh, Bush Eyes After-School Role For Faith Groups, Education Week, 20:21, p. 21, February 7, 2001.</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="36">T. Berg, The State and Religion, Wet Group, St. Paul, Minnesota, 1998.</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="37">M. Lenard, Some Target Bias in Faith-Initiative Bill, Washington, Knight Ridder Tribune Business News, p. 1, September 25, 2002.</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="38">D. Stevenson, T. Pollak, and L. Lampkin, State Nonprofit Almanac 1997, as updated by Independent Sector, 1998. www.nccs.urban.org/faqs.htm.</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="39">G. Bush, Executive Order 13198--Agency Responsibilities with Respect to Faith-Based and Community Initiatives, Washington, Weekly Compilation of Presidential Documents, 37:5, p. 233, February 5, 2001.</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="40">C. Lindell, Bush Opens Grants To Faith Groups Foes Charge Church-State Commingling, The Atlanta Journal-Constitution, p. E. 16, December 13, 2002.</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="41">Internal Revenue Service, 1998 Data Book, Publication 55B, Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C., 1998.</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="42">B. Broadway, Faith-Based Groups Benefit from New Federal Grants, The Washington Post, Washington, D.C., p. B09, August 3, 2002.</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="43">Dolter v. Wahlert High School, 483 F.Supp. 266 (Dist. Ct. of Northern Iowa 1980).</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="44">42 U.S.C. Sec. 701.</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="45">U.S. Census Bureau, Statistics of U.S. Businesses: 1999, National Employment Statistics. www.bls.gov.</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="46">Fortino v. Quasar, 950 F.2d 389 (7th Cir. 1991).</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="47">Healey v. Southwood Psychiatry Hospital, 78 F.3e 123 (3rd Cir. 1996).</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="48">H. Findley, E. Ingram, and G. Amsler, Religious Accommodation Principles for Employers, Journal of Individual Employment Rights, 9:3, pp. 211-225, 2001.</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="49">Employment Division, Department of Human Resources of Oregon v. Smith, 494 U.S. 872 (1990).</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="50">Mueller v. Allen, 463 U.S. 388 (1983).</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="51">Audra Sommers v. Budget Marketing, 667 F.2d 748 (8th Cir. 1982).</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="52">Rayburn v. General Conference of Seventh-day Adventists, 772 F.2d 1164 (4th Cir. 1985).</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="53">EEOC v. Pacific Press Publishing Association, 676 F.2d 1272 (9th Cir. 1982).</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="54">M. Triplett, Faith-Based Executive Order Guidance Responds to Job Bias, HR NEWS, 22:1, p. 4, January 2003.</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="55">University of Great Falls v. NLRB, 278 F.3d 1355 (Court of Appeals Dist of Col, 2002).</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="56">R. Robinson, G. Franklin, and R. Wayland, The Regulatory Environment of Human Resource Management, Harcourt, Fort Worth, Texas, 2002.</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="57">D. Milbank, Bush Issues 'Faith-Based Initiative' Orders; Decrees Would Allow Religious Programs to Get Federal Money, Contracts, The Washington Post, p. AO4, December 13, 2002.</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="58">Witters v. Washington Department of Services for the Blind, 474 U.S. 481 (1986).</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="59">Zobrest v. Catalina Foothills School District, 509 U.S. 1 (1993).</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="60">Bowen v. Kendrick, 487 U.S. 589 (Supreme Court, 1988).</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="61">National Center for Charitable Statistics, Frequently asked questions http://nccs. urban.org.</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="62">G. Webster, Regulating Employee's Off Duty Conduct, Association Management, 44:7, p. 99, 1992.</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="63">Waltz v. Tax Commission, 397 U.S. 664 (1970).</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="64">Wolman v. Walter, 433 U.S. 229 (1977).</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="65">Aguilar v. Felton, 473 U.S. 402 (1985).</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="66">Tilton v. Richardson, 403 U.S. 672 (1971).</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
							<bib-other>
								<bibtext seqNum="67">Committee For Public Education and Religious Liberty v. Nyquist, 413 U.S. 756 (1973).</bibtext>
							</bib-other>
						</biblist>
					</ArticleHeader>
				</Article>
			</Issue>
		</Volume>
	</Journal>
</Publisher>
