<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE Publisher PUBLIC "-//MetaPress//DTD MetaPress 2.0//EN" "http://public.metapress.com/dtd/MPRESS/MetaPressv2.dtd">
<Publisher>
	<PublisherInfo>
		<PublisherName>Baywood Publishing Company</PublisherName>
	</PublisherInfo>
	<Journal>
		<JournalInfo JournalType="Journals">
			<JournalPrintISSN>1055-7512</JournalPrintISSN>
			<JournalElectronicISSN>1541-3799</JournalElectronicISSN>
			<JournalTitle>Journal of Individual Employment Rights</JournalTitle>
			<JournalCode>BWIE</JournalCode>
			<JournalID>300324</JournalID>
			<JournalURL>http://baywood.metapress.com/link.asp?target=journal&amp;id=300324</JournalURL>
		</JournalInfo>
		<Volume>
			<VolumeInfo>
				<VolumeNumber>11</VolumeNumber>
			</VolumeInfo>
			<Issue>
				<IssueInfo IssueType="Regular">
					<IssueNumberBegin>3</IssueNumberBegin>
					<IssueNumberEnd>3</IssueNumberEnd>
					<IssueSupplement>0</IssueSupplement>
					<IssuePartStart>0</IssuePartStart>
					<IssuePartEnd>0</IssuePartEnd>
					<IssueSequence>000011000320030701</IssueSequence>
					<IssuePublicationDate>
						<CoverDate Year="2003" Month="7" Day="1"/>
						<CoverDisplay>Number 3/2003-2004</CoverDisplay>
					</IssuePublicationDate>
					<IssueID>6L41C1YTDPPE</IssueID>
					<IssueURL>http://baywood.metapress.com/link.asp?target=issue&amp;id=6L41C1YTDPPE</IssueURL>
				</IssueInfo>
				<Article ArticleType="Original">
					<ArticleInfo Free="No" ESM="No">
						<ArticleDOI>10.2190/46U9-T06L-8M32-PEFM</ArticleDOI>
						<ArticlePII>46U9T06L8M32PEFM</ArticlePII>
						<ArticleSequenceNumber>211</ArticleSequenceNumber>
						<ArticleTitle Language="En">STUDYING EMPLOYEE TURNOVER BY SPLITTING UP THE USUAL COMPARISON GROUP</ArticleTitle>
						<ArticleFirstPage>211</ArticleFirstPage>
						<ArticleLastPage>227</ArticleLastPage>
						<ArticleHistory>
							<RegistrationDate>20050916</RegistrationDate>
							<ReceivedDate>20050916</ReceivedDate>
							<Accepted>20050916</Accepted>
							<OnlineDate>20050916</OnlineDate>
						</ArticleHistory>
						<FullTextFileName>46U9T06L8M32PEFM.pdf</FullTextFileName>
						<FullTextURL>http://baywood.metapress.com/link.asp?target=contribution&amp;id=46U9T06L8M32PEFM</FullTextURL>
						<Composite>3</Composite>
					</ArticleInfo>
					<ArticleHeader>
						<AuthorGroup>
							<Author AffiliationID="A1">
								<GivenName>HERMAN</GivenName>
								<Initials/>
								<FamilyName>STEENSMA</FamilyName>
								<Degrees/>
								<Roles/>
							</Author>
							<Author AffiliationID="A1">
								<GivenName>WIM VAN</GivenName>
								<Initials/>
								<FamilyName>BREUKELEN</FamilyName>
								<Degrees/>
								<Roles/>
							</Author>
							<Author AffiliationID="A2">
								<GivenName>MARISKA</GivenName>
								<Initials/>
								<FamilyName>STURM</FamilyName>
								<Degrees/>
								<Roles/>
							</Author>
							<Affiliation AFFID="A1">
								<OrgDivision/>
								<OrgName>Leiden University, The Netherlands</OrgName>
								<OrgAddress/>
							</Affiliation>
							<Affiliation AFFID="A2">
								<OrgDivision/>
								<OrgName>Dutch Space, Leiden, The Netherlands</OrgName>
								<OrgAddress/>
							</Affiliation>
						</AuthorGroup>
						<Abstract Language="En">The purpose of this study is to demonstrate how a mixed method of turnover research, combining advantages of traditional methods while reducing the disadvantages, may improve the fitness-for-use of turnover research for organizations. In a survey study, an exit group of former employees who had left an organization voluntarily was compared with a group of employees who were still working in the organization. Then, the comparison group was split into two subgroups. The true-comparison group was composed of employees who had a low intention of quitting. The potential-turnover group was formed by employees with a high intention of leaving the organization. Results show that, in general, no differences exist between the exit group and the potential-turnover group in mean scores on variables that (according to theory) determine turnover. But the exit group and the true-comparison group differ sharply. Implications for turnover research are discussed.</Abstract>
					</ArticleHeader>
				</Article>
			</Issue>
		</Volume>
	</Journal>
</Publisher>
