<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE Publisher PUBLIC "-//MetaPress//DTD MetaPress 2.0//EN" "http://public.metapress.com/dtd/MPRESS/MetaPressv2.dtd">
<Publisher>
	<PublisherInfo>
		<PublisherName>Baywood Publishing Company</PublisherName>
	</PublisherInfo>
	<Journal>
		<JournalInfo JournalType="Journals">
			<JournalPrintISSN>1055-7512</JournalPrintISSN>
			<JournalElectronicISSN>1541-3799</JournalElectronicISSN>
			<JournalTitle>Journal of Individual Employment Rights</JournalTitle>
			<JournalCode>BWIE</JournalCode>
			<JournalID>300324</JournalID>
			<JournalURL>http://baywood.metapress.com/link.asp?target=journal&amp;id=300324</JournalURL>
		</JournalInfo>
		<Volume>
			<VolumeInfo>
				<VolumeNumber>4</VolumeNumber>
			</VolumeInfo>
			<Issue>
				<IssueInfo IssueType="Regular">
					<IssueNumberBegin>1</IssueNumberBegin>
					<IssueNumberEnd>1</IssueNumberEnd>
					<IssueSupplement>0</IssueSupplement>
					<IssuePartStart>0</IssuePartStart>
					<IssuePartEnd>0</IssuePartEnd>
					<IssueSequence>000004000119950101</IssueSequence>
					<IssuePublicationDate>
						<CoverDate Year="1995" Month="1" Day="1"/>
						<CoverDisplay>Number 1 / 1995-96</CoverDisplay>
					</IssuePublicationDate>
					<IssueID>8GKRW69AKHAN</IssueID>
					<IssueURL>http://baywood.metapress.com/link.asp?target=issue&amp;id=8GKRW69AKHAN</IssueURL>
				</IssueInfo>
				<Article ArticleType="Original">
					<ArticleInfo Free="No" ESM="No">
						<ArticleDOI>10.2190/EHXB-MN6X-79T6-BFDC</ArticleDOI>
						<ArticlePII>EHXBMN6X79T6BFDC</ArticlePII>
						<ArticleSequenceNumber>2</ArticleSequenceNumber>
						<ArticleTitle Language="En">Is it Time Yet for a Statute to End Employment at Will?: Lessons from the History of Workers' Compensation</ArticleTitle>
						<ArticleFirstPage>15</ArticleFirstPage>
						<ArticleLastPage>29</ArticleLastPage>
						<ArticleHistory>
							<RegistrationDate>20020509</RegistrationDate>
							<ReceivedDate>20020509</ReceivedDate>
							<Accepted>20020509</Accepted>
							<OnlineDate>20020509</OnlineDate>
						</ArticleHistory>
						<FullTextFileName>EHXBMN6X79T6BFDC.pdf</FullTextFileName>
						<FullTextURL>http://baywood.metapress.com/link.asp?target=contribution&amp;id=EHXBMN6X79T6BFDC</FullTextURL>
						<Composite>1</Composite>
					</ArticleInfo>
					<ArticleHeader>
						<AuthorGroup>
							<Author AffiliationID="A1">
								<GivenName>Wayne</GivenName>
								<Initials/>
								<FamilyName>Eastman</FamilyName>
								<Degrees>J.D.</Degrees>
								<Roles/>
							</Author>
							<Affiliation AFFID="A1">
								<OrgDivision/>
								<OrgName>Rutgers University, Newark, New Jersey</OrgName>
								<OrgAddress/>
							</Affiliation>
						</AuthorGroup>
						<Abstract Language="En">Numerous proposals to end employment at will and restrict wrongful discharge suits have been offered. Advocates contend that employers have an incentive to support such legislation, just as employers had an incentive to support workers' compensation laws. However, such legislation has made little headway. This article takes a close look at the analogy with workers' compensation and argues that legislation to end employment at will is unlikely to succeed unless it, like workers' compensation, involves a broad shift in employment law with principled appeal to employers as well as employees. It suggests that provisions affirming duties for employees as well as employers have the potential to break the current legislative impasse.</Abstract>
					</ArticleHeader>
				</Article>
			</Issue>
		</Volume>
	</Journal>
</Publisher>
