10.2190/7256-VEWK-YHY1-EMXQ 7256VEWKYHY1EMXQ 5 Tenure and Promotion Policies in Colleges and Universities: Confidentiality and Defamation in Peer Reviews 53 70 20020509 20020509 20020509 20020509 7256VEWKYHY1EMXQ.pdf http://baywood.metapress.com/link.asp?target=contribution&id=7256VEWKYHY1EMXQ 1 Clifford M. Koen Jr. William P. Galle Jr. University of New Orleans, Louisiana One of the most noteworthy Supreme Court decisions in recent years for administrators in institutions of higher education is <i>University of Pennsylvania v. EEOC</i>. The Court held that colleges and universities may be forced to disclose confidential peer review records when accused of illegally denying tenure to a faculty member. This article reviews the results of a national survey of chief academic officers concerning the impact of the Supreme Court's decision on the tenure review process. A brief review of defamation law is provided. Implications for academic administrators and peer evaluators are discussed. Predictions by legal experts of dramatic changes in the peer review process have thus far become reality at only a few institutions (e.g., abolishing tenure). The policies and practices employed in tenure decisions by colleges and universities are reviewed. Analysis of the data indicates that most institutions have implemented few significant changes as a result of the Court's ruling.